Home Anti-Mouse GPI-PLD Antisera Highlight Structural Differences between Murine and Bovine GPI-PLDs
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Anti-Mouse GPI-PLD Antisera Highlight Structural Differences between Murine and Bovine GPI-PLDs

  • P. Gregory , A. Ziemiecki , G. Zürcher , U. Brodbeck and P. Bütikofer
Published/Copyright: June 1, 2005
Biological Chemistry
From the journal Volume 384 Issue 12

Abstract

Despite its well characterised biochemistry, the physiological role of glycosylphosphatidylinositolspecific phospholipase D (GPIPLD) is unknown. Most of the previous studies investigating the distribution of GPI-PLD have focused on the human and bovine forms of the enzyme. Studies on mouse GPI-PLD are rare, partly due to the lack of a specific antimouse GPI-PLD antibody, but also due to the apparent low reactivity of existing antibodies to rodent GPI-PLDs. Here we describe the isolation of a mouse liver cDNA, the construction and expression of a recombinant enzyme and the generation of an affinitypurified rabbit antimouse GPI-PLD antiserum. The antibody shows good reactivity to partially purified murine and purified bovine GPI-PLD. In contrast, a rat antibovine GPI-PLD antibody shows no reactivity with the mouse enzyme and the two antibodies recognise different proteolytic fragments of the bovine enzyme. Comparison between the rodent, bovine and human enzymes indicates that small changes in the amino acid sequence of a short peptide in the mouse and bovine GPI-PLDs may contribute to the different reactivities of the two antisera. We discuss the implications of these results and stress the importance of antibody selection while investigating GPI-PLD in the mouse.

:
Published Online: 2005-06-01
Published in Print: 2003-12-25

Copyright © 2003 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/BC.2003.174/html
Scroll to top button