Home Law 6 Independent Commission Against Corruption
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

6 Independent Commission Against Corruption

View more publications by Hong Kong University Press
Within the space of a few decades Hong Kong has gone from being a societyplagued by corruption to having one of the world’s cleanest public services.That is largely due to the success of the Independent Commission AgainstCorruption (ICAC), which has become one of the largest anti-corruptionbodies in the world with an annual budget in excess of HK$600 millionand a staff of more than 1,300 (ICAC, 2006a).Today, the ICAC is internationally respected, not just for its work inHong Kong but also for the advice it offers others elsewhere who are alsoseeking to eradicate bribery. International publications have lavished praiseon the ICAC’s success. But how did Hong Kong produce such a successstory and create a culture of anti-corruption? To answer that question, weneed to turn back to the first legislative attempts to tackle corruption morethan a century ago.The Early DaysAnti-bribery legislation began in Hong Kong with the MisdemeanoursPunishment Ordinance (No. 3 of 1898), which gave the police responsibilityfor investigating corruption among public servants. Five decades later thePrevention of Corruption Ordinance (No. 34 of 1948) was enacted and thepolice established its first unit specifically charged with tackling graft, anAnti-Corruption Squad within the Criminal Investigation Department. Fouryears later, in 1952, this was transformed into a more high-powered Anti-Corruption Branch, headed by an assistant commissioner of police.None of these early steps made much impact on the rampant corruptionthen prevalent within Hong Kong’s public sector. The problem was6Independent CommissionAgainst CorruptionIan McWalters and Anne Carver
© 2009, Hong Kong University Press

Within the space of a few decades Hong Kong has gone from being a societyplagued by corruption to having one of the world’s cleanest public services.That is largely due to the success of the Independent Commission AgainstCorruption (ICAC), which has become one of the largest anti-corruptionbodies in the world with an annual budget in excess of HK$600 millionand a staff of more than 1,300 (ICAC, 2006a).Today, the ICAC is internationally respected, not just for its work inHong Kong but also for the advice it offers others elsewhere who are alsoseeking to eradicate bribery. International publications have lavished praiseon the ICAC’s success. But how did Hong Kong produce such a successstory and create a culture of anti-corruption? To answer that question, weneed to turn back to the first legislative attempts to tackle corruption morethan a century ago.The Early DaysAnti-bribery legislation began in Hong Kong with the MisdemeanoursPunishment Ordinance (No. 3 of 1898), which gave the police responsibilityfor investigating corruption among public servants. Five decades later thePrevention of Corruption Ordinance (No. 34 of 1948) was enacted and thepolice established its first unit specifically charged with tackling graft, anAnti-Corruption Squad within the Criminal Investigation Department. Fouryears later, in 1952, this was transformed into a more high-powered Anti-Corruption Branch, headed by an assistant commissioner of police.None of these early steps made much impact on the rampant corruptionthen prevalent within Hong Kong’s public sector. The problem was6Independent CommissionAgainst CorruptionIan McWalters and Anne Carver
© 2009, Hong Kong University Press
Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9789888052424-008/html?srsltid=AfmBOopiN-cUs-Lh-92PBGrWQYL8xr44J8l7nSJHN5UxbTvc-6WekGvn
Scroll to top button