Startseite Altertumswissenschaften & Ägyptologie Ideas of Corruption in Roman Imperial Ports
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Ideas of Corruption in Roman Imperial Ports

  • Emilia Mataix Ferrándiz
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Imagine an ancient port: a cloud of people moving goods, loading and unloading ships, stocking warehouses, checking contents, boarding for travel to foreign places, etc. The same people traded, slept, ate, worshipped their gods, and fulfilled their daily needs, establishing daily interactions and networks of trust among them. Ports were thus spaces where people from different legal and social statuses collaborated, with the consequent cultural clashes and power imbalances. The latter could translate into abuses and corruption, taking different forms depending on the context and subject affected by the practice. This contribution will analyze how the use of commercial mechanisms, such as standard measurements and tasting samples, enabled the creation of trust networks and the avoidance of “twisted transfers”. Standard measures established a framework to operate, defining what was considered right and what was corrupted or wrong. In this sense, they create impersonal trust among people who do not have a personal connection and provided certainty to their transactions. However, tasting samples were also a warranty employed to check that a product corresponded to what was agreed in a transaction, so as to avoid a “twisted transfer”, as there was no trust established between the parties involved in it. Both elements underline the manifold faces of the complex phenomenon of corruption in antiquity, and provide evidence about how a port worked, what size and what sort of workforce it employed, what its output was, how people operated there, and how they organized their transactions to avoid “twisted transfers”.

Abstract

Imagine an ancient port: a cloud of people moving goods, loading and unloading ships, stocking warehouses, checking contents, boarding for travel to foreign places, etc. The same people traded, slept, ate, worshipped their gods, and fulfilled their daily needs, establishing daily interactions and networks of trust among them. Ports were thus spaces where people from different legal and social statuses collaborated, with the consequent cultural clashes and power imbalances. The latter could translate into abuses and corruption, taking different forms depending on the context and subject affected by the practice. This contribution will analyze how the use of commercial mechanisms, such as standard measurements and tasting samples, enabled the creation of trust networks and the avoidance of “twisted transfers”. Standard measures established a framework to operate, defining what was considered right and what was corrupted or wrong. In this sense, they create impersonal trust among people who do not have a personal connection and provided certainty to their transactions. However, tasting samples were also a warranty employed to check that a product corresponded to what was agreed in a transaction, so as to avoid a “twisted transfer”, as there was no trust established between the parties involved in it. Both elements underline the manifold faces of the complex phenomenon of corruption in antiquity, and provide evidence about how a port worked, what size and what sort of workforce it employed, what its output was, how people operated there, and how they organized their transactions to avoid “twisted transfers”.

Heruntergeladen am 14.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111339962-008/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen