Home Philosophy Introductory Essay Still in the Face of War: On Framing Political Realities Anew
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Introductory Essay Still in the Face of War: On Framing Political Realities Anew

  • Anton Leist and Rolf Zimmermann
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
After the War?
This chapter is in the book After the War?

Abstract

A great war changes the world. Fighting the temptation to declare it part of normality, this introduction describes three ‘Western’ fallacies which account for the Western perception of a unilateral war of aggression in Europe as unpredictable and shocking. These delusions are the belief that the world is not merely global but cosmopolitan, that the world is on the threshold of perpetual peace, and that there is a widespread trend towards non-violent social relations. We describe the one-sided philosophical motives behind these expectations, and contrast these with the prevalent social motives to nationalism, a hidden compulsion to war, and a persistent habitual cruelty, all of which are found in present Russia or other autocracies. The underlying interest in these analyses is less about deciphering the aggressor than about working towards the question of whether the often-argued thesis of modernisation is more than fiction.

Abstract

A great war changes the world. Fighting the temptation to declare it part of normality, this introduction describes three ‘Western’ fallacies which account for the Western perception of a unilateral war of aggression in Europe as unpredictable and shocking. These delusions are the belief that the world is not merely global but cosmopolitan, that the world is on the threshold of perpetual peace, and that there is a widespread trend towards non-violent social relations. We describe the one-sided philosophical motives behind these expectations, and contrast these with the prevalent social motives to nationalism, a hidden compulsion to war, and a persistent habitual cruelty, all of which are found in present Russia or other autocracies. The underlying interest in these analyses is less about deciphering the aggressor than about working towards the question of whether the often-argued thesis of modernisation is more than fiction.

Downloaded on 2.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111183343-001/html
Scroll to top button