Home Literary Studies 1 Discord at Home
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

1 Discord at Home

1Discord at HomeDecadesofscholarshiphave demonstratedthatthefamilyand therolesas-signedto its individualmembers arenotof biologicalessence.JudithButlersGenderTrouble(1990) showshowcultural constructscan,andshouldbe, decon-structed.Butlerunderstandsgenderas therhetoricalandvisualmeansbywhichsexis establishedasprediscursive,priorto cultureandapoliticallyneutral surfaceon whichcultureacts(Butler2007:10, 50).Thatlabelslikemas-culinityorfemininityappear to be natural, is aresultofinstitutionalpractices,performativelanguageand ritualisedbehaviour (Butler2007:25f., 34,45. It isthisfantasyof apre-existingsubjectwhich criticsareto exposeas aneffectof discursivepractices(Butler2007: 24,195).InanalogytoButlersdeconstruc-tionofgenderedidentity,several culturalhistoriansandsociologistshaveshownthatthediscursive mechanismsusedto describe(or prescribe)mothers,fathersandchildrenarehistoricallyand culturallyvariable(Ariès1975;Mintz1983; Zelizer1985; Rowbotham1989;Coontz199;Wallace1995;Stearns2003;Gil-lis 2008;Glitz2009;Grenby2010;Fass2011;Jenks2015) andfrequently instru-mentalisedto advocatepoliticalchange(Samuels 1986;Rowbotham1989;Davin1997). Sincepredominantideasaboutmaternity,paternityorchild-hoodevolve through dynamicprocessesofnegotiation, theyare oftenincoher-entandmayevencontradicteachother.Tostudythefamilyand therolesit as-signsto its individualmembersthusmeansto lookatthe ways in whichdifferentideologiesoverlapandcontest eachotherat oneparticularmomentin time(Be-derman1995:7).In thecourseof theeighteenthcentury, bureaucrats,doctors,lawyers andfactoryownersacquirednewpublicroles,yet thesocialadvancementoftheeducated andfinanciallysounddidnotautomaticallygiverise to acollectiveidentity.Atthe beginningof thenineteenthcentury,the termmiddleclasses¹subsumedall thosewhowereneitherholdersof large amountsofproperty,in-heritorsof substantialwealth or partof theworkingclasses(Rowbotham1989:203). Onlybythe endof thecenturyit designated aculturalmovement,led byindividualswhosharedmoralideals,behavioural standardsandapoliticalagenda(Hobsbawm1989:11). Thischangeinmeaningcanbe attributedto acli-mateof socialturmoil,whichincreasedthe demand forclassconsciousness(Hobsbawm1989:174;McClintock1995:46; Davin1997: 131).Forthosewholivedinmetropolitaneras,the IndustrialRevolutionhadgeneratedseriousprob-Thepresentstudyusesthepluralformto acknowledgethe socioeconomicandculturaldif-ferencesamongthosewhoconsidered themselvestobepart of thisgroup.https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110742763-003
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston

1Discord at HomeDecadesofscholarshiphave demonstratedthatthefamilyand therolesas-signedto its individualmembers arenotof biologicalessence.JudithButlersGenderTrouble(1990) showshowcultural constructscan,andshouldbe, decon-structed.Butlerunderstandsgenderas therhetoricalandvisualmeansbywhichsexis establishedasprediscursive,priorto cultureandapoliticallyneutral surfaceon whichcultureacts(Butler2007:10, 50).Thatlabelslikemas-culinityorfemininityappear to be natural, is aresultofinstitutionalpractices,performativelanguageand ritualisedbehaviour (Butler2007:25f., 34,45. It isthisfantasyof apre-existingsubjectwhich criticsareto exposeas aneffectof discursivepractices(Butler2007: 24,195).InanalogytoButlersdeconstruc-tionofgenderedidentity,several culturalhistoriansandsociologistshaveshownthatthediscursive mechanismsusedto describe(or prescribe)mothers,fathersandchildrenarehistoricallyand culturallyvariable(Ariès1975;Mintz1983; Zelizer1985; Rowbotham1989;Coontz199;Wallace1995;Stearns2003;Gil-lis 2008;Glitz2009;Grenby2010;Fass2011;Jenks2015) andfrequently instru-mentalisedto advocatepoliticalchange(Samuels 1986;Rowbotham1989;Davin1997). Sincepredominantideasaboutmaternity,paternityorchild-hoodevolve through dynamicprocessesofnegotiation, theyare oftenincoher-entandmayevencontradicteachother.Tostudythefamilyand therolesit as-signsto its individualmembersthusmeansto lookatthe ways in whichdifferentideologiesoverlapandcontest eachotherat oneparticularmomentin time(Be-derman1995:7).In thecourseof theeighteenthcentury, bureaucrats,doctors,lawyers andfactoryownersacquirednewpublicroles,yet thesocialadvancementoftheeducated andfinanciallysounddidnotautomaticallygiverise to acollectiveidentity.Atthe beginningof thenineteenthcentury,the termmiddleclasses¹subsumedall thosewhowereneitherholdersof large amountsofproperty,in-heritorsof substantialwealth or partof theworkingclasses(Rowbotham1989:203). Onlybythe endof thecenturyit designated aculturalmovement,led byindividualswhosharedmoralideals,behavioural standardsandapoliticalagenda(Hobsbawm1989:11). Thischangeinmeaningcanbe attributedto acli-mateof socialturmoil,whichincreasedthe demand forclassconsciousness(Hobsbawm1989:174;McClintock1995:46; Davin1997: 131).Forthosewholivedinmetropolitaneras,the IndustrialRevolutionhadgeneratedseriousprob-Thepresentstudyusesthepluralformto acknowledgethe socioeconomicandculturaldif-ferencesamongthosewhoconsidered themselvestobepart of thisgroup.https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110742763-003
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston
Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110742763-003/html?licenseType=restricted&srsltid=AfmBOopboelbxURxE-wxI7MkKa_jnz9j6RskNi9mKRWJgv-kaVlw1ecV
Scroll to top button