Home History The “good Orientalists”
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The “good Orientalists”

  • Lena Salaymeh
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Westernness
This chapter is in the book Westernness

Abstract

This chapter argues that some scholars portray Ignac Goldziher as a “good Orientalist.” Contesting the assumptions behind the distinction between “good” and “bad” orientalists, the chapter shows that Goldziher’s scholarly methods relied on Orientalist bias. Such bias is the result of blindly repeating and imposing Eurocentric methods, including the blurring of Jewish and Islamic traditions into a single “Semitic” or “religious” tradition.

Abstract

This chapter argues that some scholars portray Ignac Goldziher as a “good Orientalist.” Contesting the assumptions behind the distinction between “good” and “bad” orientalists, the chapter shows that Goldziher’s scholarly methods relied on Orientalist bias. Such bias is the result of blindly repeating and imposing Eurocentric methods, including the blurring of Jewish and Islamic traditions into a single “Semitic” or “religious” tradition.

Downloaded on 30.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110728422-007/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOoqCzaYc_5fefvX3Vl0xrpsy4znlOcsXpsf14WgNVonVR-lQyLYm
Scroll to top button