Home History Global History
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Global History

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Handbook of Historical Animal Studies
This chapter is in the book Handbook of Historical Animal Studies
JuliaHauserGlobalHistory1Introduction and OverviewThe field ofglobalhistory emergedduringthe 1990s asasuccessor to otherap-proachesto writingthe history of the world such as universal and world history,and asapartial critiqueofthem. Pre-enlightenment attemptsatwriting the historyof the world stronglytied in with theologyand wereaimed at making sense of thehistory of creation.¹Animals and plants weredeemed subordinateto humans inthe great chain of being,with humans considered the crowningglory of creation.Then again, not all humans werecreated equal from the perspective of universalhis-tory.Members of oral cultures outside Europe, supposedlyrepresenting thechild-hoodof humankind wereconsidered part of natural historyrather than of itshuman counterpart.²From the late eighteenth century onwards,anincreasing num-ber of European scientists, therefore, considered members of these cultures as occu-pyingaliminal zone between humans and animals.³In the course of the Enlightenment,natural history began to split off fromhumanhistory,with the latter taking an increasingly secular turn. New approachesto worldhistory focused on mankind alone while excludingnature and those parts ofhumanityallegedlycloserto it.Inthis kind of historiographythat evolvedalong withnineteenth-century imperialism, the idea of progress came to be considered centralto history,and animalsand members of allegedlyprimitivecultures as being out-side of it.It was onlywith the development ofbig historysince the 1970sthatna-turere-entered narrations of the history of the world.Ferreyrolles, Gérard. On the History of Universal History.InUniversal Historyand theMaking of theGlobal,Hall Bjørmstad, HelgeJordheim, Anne Régent-Susini (eds.). NewYork, NY andLondon: Rout-ledge,2019,1223.Fabian,Johannes.Time and the Other.How AnthropologyMakesits Object.NewYork, NY:ColumbiaUniversity Press, 1983.Bourke,Joanna.What itMeans to be Human. Reflections from 1791tothe Present.London:Virago,2011.Conrad, Sebastian.What isGlobal History.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press,2016,2728.McNeill,William andJohn Robert McNeill.TheHumanWeb: ABirds-Eye View ofWorldHistory.NewYork, NY:Norton,2003;Spier ,Fred.TheStructureofBig History. From theBigBang UntilToday.Amsterdam:Amsterdam University Press, 1996;Christian, David,Cynthia StokesBrown andCraig Benjamin.Big History: Between Nothing and Everything.NewYork, NY:McGrawHill Education,2014.The animal natureofhumans israrelystressed in theseworks.Foranexception, seeYuvalNoahHarari,who, nonetheless, emphasizes the alleged superiority of humans.Harari,YuvalNoah.Sapiens.ABrief HistoryofHumankind.London: Harvill Secker,2014.https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110536553-018
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston

JuliaHauserGlobalHistory1Introduction and OverviewThe field ofglobalhistory emergedduringthe 1990s asasuccessor to otherap-proachesto writingthe history of the world such as universal and world history,and asapartial critiqueofthem. Pre-enlightenment attemptsatwriting the historyof the world stronglytied in with theologyand wereaimed at making sense of thehistory of creation.¹Animals and plants weredeemed subordinateto humans inthe great chain of being,with humans considered the crowningglory of creation.Then again, not all humans werecreated equal from the perspective of universalhis-tory.Members of oral cultures outside Europe, supposedlyrepresenting thechild-hoodof humankind wereconsidered part of natural historyrather than of itshuman counterpart.²From the late eighteenth century onwards,anincreasing num-ber of European scientists, therefore, considered members of these cultures as occu-pyingaliminal zone between humans and animals.³In the course of the Enlightenment,natural history began to split off fromhumanhistory,with the latter taking an increasingly secular turn. New approachesto worldhistory focused on mankind alone while excludingnature and those parts ofhumanityallegedlycloserto it.Inthis kind of historiographythat evolvedalong withnineteenth-century imperialism, the idea of progress came to be considered centralto history,and animalsand members of allegedlyprimitivecultures as being out-side of it.It was onlywith the development ofbig historysince the 1970sthatna-turere-entered narrations of the history of the world.Ferreyrolles, Gérard. On the History of Universal History.InUniversal Historyand theMaking of theGlobal,Hall Bjørmstad, HelgeJordheim, Anne Régent-Susini (eds.). NewYork, NY andLondon: Rout-ledge,2019,1223.Fabian,Johannes.Time and the Other.How AnthropologyMakesits Object.NewYork, NY:ColumbiaUniversity Press, 1983.Bourke,Joanna.What itMeans to be Human. Reflections from 1791tothe Present.London:Virago,2011.Conrad, Sebastian.What isGlobal History.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press,2016,2728.McNeill,William andJohn Robert McNeill.TheHumanWeb: ABirds-Eye View ofWorldHistory.NewYork, NY:Norton,2003;Spier ,Fred.TheStructureofBig History. From theBigBang UntilToday.Amsterdam:Amsterdam University Press, 1996;Christian, David,Cynthia StokesBrown andCraig Benjamin.Big History: Between Nothing and Everything.NewYork, NY:McGrawHill Education,2014.The animal natureofhumans israrelystressed in theseworks.Foranexception, seeYuvalNoahHarari,who, nonetheless, emphasizes the alleged superiority of humans.Harari,YuvalNoah.Sapiens.ABrief HistoryofHumankind.London: Harvill Secker,2014.https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110536553-018
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston
Downloaded on 9.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110536553-018/html?licenseType=restricted&srsltid=AfmBOorsI4BbIdamj1I-OHLhuIE87oK9LXFrZkHXOCrb9b-K7UGZWz7q
Scroll to top button