Home Cultural Studies Chapter Seven “A Crisis of Modern Music or Audience?” Changing Attitudes to Cultural and Stylistic Pluralism (1925–30)
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter Seven “A Crisis of Modern Music or Audience?” Changing Attitudes to Cultural and Stylistic Pluralism (1925–30)

View more publications by Boydell and Brewer
Opera and Ideology in Prague
This chapter is in the book Opera and Ideology in Prague
Chapter Seven“A Crisis of Modern Music orAudience?”Changing Attitudes to Cultural and StylisticPluralism (192530)The late 1920s were years of transition for the musical community of Prague, asthe last vestiges of the prewar rivalries receded substantially in favor of newalliances. This period also witnessed the rise of a new generation of younger com-posers and critics, many of whose values and aesthetic views bore only a faintresemblance to those of their forebears. During what were perhaps the mostpeaceful and prosperous years of the First Republic, the issue of “national music”lost much of the urgency it had carried in earlier years; only now and then did itstand as a marker by which to judge the latest modernist imports from WesternEurope. Indeed, the attitude in the Prague compositional community at this timetoward modernism was influenced by music from abroad as never before. Not soamong the public: this new open-mindedness became a source of tension betweenartists and audiences, similar to crises in other European cities. Although the ini-tial period of “nation building” had passed for First Republic society, the issue ofthe social responsibility of art, particularly regarding modern or even popularmusic, retained its focus as a priority for the younger generation. Again, the diver-gent views of musicians and their audiences reveals much about the culturalmilieu of Prague in these years: while critics debated the social necessity for mod-ern music, both domestic and foreign, attendance at performances dwindled toan all-time low.For most audience members, both the Czech and the international composi-tions at Prague’s 1925International Society for Contemporary Music (ISCM)festival provoked widespread apathy toward foreign influences, reflecting some-what the disappointment in European modernism at the previous year’s event.
© 2006, Boydell and Brewer

Chapter Seven“A Crisis of Modern Music orAudience?”Changing Attitudes to Cultural and StylisticPluralism (192530)The late 1920s were years of transition for the musical community of Prague, asthe last vestiges of the prewar rivalries receded substantially in favor of newalliances. This period also witnessed the rise of a new generation of younger com-posers and critics, many of whose values and aesthetic views bore only a faintresemblance to those of their forebears. During what were perhaps the mostpeaceful and prosperous years of the First Republic, the issue of “national music”lost much of the urgency it had carried in earlier years; only now and then did itstand as a marker by which to judge the latest modernist imports from WesternEurope. Indeed, the attitude in the Prague compositional community at this timetoward modernism was influenced by music from abroad as never before. Not soamong the public: this new open-mindedness became a source of tension betweenartists and audiences, similar to crises in other European cities. Although the ini-tial period of “nation building” had passed for First Republic society, the issue ofthe social responsibility of art, particularly regarding modern or even popularmusic, retained its focus as a priority for the younger generation. Again, the diver-gent views of musicians and their audiences reveals much about the culturalmilieu of Prague in these years: while critics debated the social necessity for mod-ern music, both domestic and foreign, attendance at performances dwindled toan all-time low.For most audience members, both the Czech and the international composi-tions at Prague’s 1925International Society for Contemporary Music (ISCM)festival provoked widespread apathy toward foreign influences, reflecting some-what the disappointment in European modernism at the previous year’s event.
© 2006, Boydell and Brewer
Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781580466660-012/html?licenseType=restricted&srsltid=AfmBOop_WoZGMWJVWc_H496JSz8QAwJxUbgDYiefDfQoCrmObjl4IIbV
Scroll to top button