Home 3 The Evolution of Proxy War Since 1945
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

3 The Evolution of Proxy War Since 1945

View more publications by Stanford University Press
Proxy War
This chapter is in the book Proxy War
Chapter 3the evolution of proxy War SinCe 1945any intervention presents risk. regardless of time or technology, fueling existing violence as a means to intervene in the affairs of another state adds concerns about fog and friction. War has a way of confounding policy because it is so difficult to account for the myriad variables that in-fluence its outcome. in addition, interventions have known second-order effects. a state may get drawn into the conflict deeper than it intended, even leading to a direct intervention. if the conflict breaks bad, domestic and/or political costs could skyrocket. a rival state may enter the fray and raise the costs or spoil the opportunity to achieve the desired objectives. for good or ill, these factors influence the outcome and duration of an intrastate conflict.1in this chapter, i aim to shed some light on how the changing times have influenced the use of proxy war. i argue that the general reason states use proxies has not changed, but the structure of the world order and the underlying factors that accompany different types of order do influence a state’s use of proxy war. More specifically, i develop a model that de-scribes, and potentially predicts, the conditions under which a state will resort to proxy war.has proxy war changed? richard haass predicted at the end of the twentieth century that “the post–Cold War world promises to be a messy one where violence is common, where conflicts within and between
© 2020 Stanford University Press, Redwood City

Chapter 3the evolution of proxy War SinCe 1945any intervention presents risk. regardless of time or technology, fueling existing violence as a means to intervene in the affairs of another state adds concerns about fog and friction. War has a way of confounding policy because it is so difficult to account for the myriad variables that in-fluence its outcome. in addition, interventions have known second-order effects. a state may get drawn into the conflict deeper than it intended, even leading to a direct intervention. if the conflict breaks bad, domestic and/or political costs could skyrocket. a rival state may enter the fray and raise the costs or spoil the opportunity to achieve the desired objectives. for good or ill, these factors influence the outcome and duration of an intrastate conflict.1in this chapter, i aim to shed some light on how the changing times have influenced the use of proxy war. i argue that the general reason states use proxies has not changed, but the structure of the world order and the underlying factors that accompany different types of order do influence a state’s use of proxy war. More specifically, i develop a model that de-scribes, and potentially predicts, the conditions under which a state will resort to proxy war.has proxy war changed? richard haass predicted at the end of the twentieth century that “the post–Cold War world promises to be a messy one where violence is common, where conflicts within and between
© 2020 Stanford University Press, Redwood City
Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781503608733-004/html?licenseType=restricted&srsltid=AfmBOoqND5d20r_OX33LDqKBgiNmkIjvJsu3-JhedQyr8oWigrkBKUKg
Scroll to top button