Home Notes
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Notes

View more publications by Cornell University Press
Infrastructures of Impunity
This chapter is in the book Infrastructures of Impunity
213213INTRODUCTION1.Teitel, Transitional Justice.2.There is extensive scholarly and political debate regarding the definition and application of the term “genocide,” especially to the Indonesian case. The most recent legal review by the International People’s Tribunal for 1965 has concluded that this was a case of genocide (IPT 1965, Final Report). Furthermore, the affective and social processes over multiple generations that are the core of the infrastructure of impunity resonate with Alexander Hinton’s expansive definition of genocide as “the more or less coordinated attempt to destroy a dehumanized and excluded group of people because of who they are.” Hinton, “Critical Genocide Studies,” 10. For a review of the term “genocide” as applied in Indonesia, see Roosa, Buried Histories, 23–26.3.J okowi’s vision was called Nawa Cita. For all nine points of the Nawa Cita, see “Jadikan Indonesia mandiri, berkepribadian, dan berdaulat,” Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. February2015, https://kominfo.go.id/index.php/content/detail/5629/NAWACITA%3A+9+Program+Perubahan+Untuk+Indonesia/0/infografis.4.Felman, Juridical Unconscious, 146.5.Feitlowitz, Lexicon of Terror, 22.6.Feitlowitz, Lexicon of Terror, 22.7.Feitlowitz, Lexicon of Terror, 22.8.Feitlowitz, Lexicon of Terror, 23.9.Teitel, “Human Rights Genealogy”; Moyn, Last Utopia.10.Teitel, “Human Rights Genealogy,” 317.11.Keenan, “Mobilizing Shame.”12.The legal scholar Priscilla Hayner notes that what constitutes the truth sought by commissions varies and is often open to interpretation by those individuals serving as commissioners, but that these temporary bodies share several key elements: a focus on past events and patterns occurring during a period of time, engagement with affected populations, a final report, and their having been authorized by the state under review. Hayner is also one of the founders of the International Center for Transitional Justice, an NGO that has provided training, funding, expertise, and advocacy for transitional justice interventions around the world. See Hayner, Unspeakable Truths, 11.13.Hayner, Unspeakable Truths, 92.14.Rotberg and Thompson, Truth v. Justice.15.Hayner, Unspeakable Truths, 92.16.Rowen, Searching for Truth, 11.17.Hayner, Unspeakable Truths. On historical justice, see Teitel, Transitional Justice, chap. 3.18.Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem; Douglas, Memory of Judgment.19.Teitel, Transitional Justice, 73.20.Teitel, Globalizing Transitional Justice, 110.21.Leebaw, Judging State-Sponsored Violence.22.Miller, “Effects of Invisibility.”Notes
© 2023 Cornell University Press, Ithaca

213213INTRODUCTION1.Teitel, Transitional Justice.2.There is extensive scholarly and political debate regarding the definition and application of the term “genocide,” especially to the Indonesian case. The most recent legal review by the International People’s Tribunal for 1965 has concluded that this was a case of genocide (IPT 1965, Final Report). Furthermore, the affective and social processes over multiple generations that are the core of the infrastructure of impunity resonate with Alexander Hinton’s expansive definition of genocide as “the more or less coordinated attempt to destroy a dehumanized and excluded group of people because of who they are.” Hinton, “Critical Genocide Studies,” 10. For a review of the term “genocide” as applied in Indonesia, see Roosa, Buried Histories, 23–26.3.J okowi’s vision was called Nawa Cita. For all nine points of the Nawa Cita, see “Jadikan Indonesia mandiri, berkepribadian, dan berdaulat,” Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. February2015, https://kominfo.go.id/index.php/content/detail/5629/NAWACITA%3A+9+Program+Perubahan+Untuk+Indonesia/0/infografis.4.Felman, Juridical Unconscious, 146.5.Feitlowitz, Lexicon of Terror, 22.6.Feitlowitz, Lexicon of Terror, 22.7.Feitlowitz, Lexicon of Terror, 22.8.Feitlowitz, Lexicon of Terror, 23.9.Teitel, “Human Rights Genealogy”; Moyn, Last Utopia.10.Teitel, “Human Rights Genealogy,” 317.11.Keenan, “Mobilizing Shame.”12.The legal scholar Priscilla Hayner notes that what constitutes the truth sought by commissions varies and is often open to interpretation by those individuals serving as commissioners, but that these temporary bodies share several key elements: a focus on past events and patterns occurring during a period of time, engagement with affected populations, a final report, and their having been authorized by the state under review. Hayner is also one of the founders of the International Center for Transitional Justice, an NGO that has provided training, funding, expertise, and advocacy for transitional justice interventions around the world. See Hayner, Unspeakable Truths, 11.13.Hayner, Unspeakable Truths, 92.14.Rotberg and Thompson, Truth v. Justice.15.Hayner, Unspeakable Truths, 92.16.Rowen, Searching for Truth, 11.17.Hayner, Unspeakable Truths. On historical justice, see Teitel, Transitional Justice, chap. 3.18.Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem; Douglas, Memory of Judgment.19.Teitel, Transitional Justice, 73.20.Teitel, Globalizing Transitional Justice, 110.21.Leebaw, Judging State-Sponsored Violence.22.Miller, “Effects of Invisibility.”Notes
© 2023 Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781501773129-012/html?licenseType=restricted&srsltid=AfmBOopxBzq9-wnj1Skr5PR0WYRu0RR_br3G3HuSQx3_a5YSiiBkaiDe
Scroll to top button