Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Notes

Weitere Titel anzeigen von SUNY Press
Divine Scapegoats
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Divine Scapegoats
NotesIntroduction1. On this conceptual development see J. Dan, “Samael, Lilith, and the Concept of Evil in Early Kabbalah,” AJSR 5 (1980) 17–40; M. Idel, “The Evil Thought of the Deity,” Ta r b i z 49 (1980) 356–364 [Hebrew]; G. Scholem, “The Kabbalah of R. Jacob and R. Isaac, the Sons of R. Jacob ha-Kohen,” Maddacei ha-Yahadut 2 (1927) 165–293 [Hebrew]; idem, “Sitra Ahra: Good and Evil in the Kabbalah,” in: On the Mystical Shape of the Godhead: Basic Concepts in the Kabbalah (New York: Schocken, 1991) 56–87; I. Tishby, The Doctrine of Evil and the “Kelippah” in Lurianic Kabbalism (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1984) [Hebrew]; idem, The Wisdom of the Zohar: An Anthology of Texts (3 vols.; London: The Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 1989); E. R. Wolf-son, “Left Contained in the Right: A Study in Zoharic Hermeneutics,” AJSR 11 (1986) 27–52; idem, “Light through Darkness: The Ideal of Human Perfection in the Zohar,” HTR 81 (1988) 73–95. The Curses of Azazel1. The general scholarly consensus holds that the apocalypse was com-posed after 70 CE and before the end of the second century CE. The depiction of the destruction of the Temple in chapter 27 and the peculiar interest in the idea of the celestial sanctuary represented by the divine Chariot hint at the fact that the earthly sanctuary was no longer standing. Another significant chronological marker is established by the second century work—the Clemen-tine Recognitiones 32–33 which provides one of the earliest external references for the dating of the Apocalypse of Abraham. On the date of the Apocalypse of Abraham, see G.H. Box and J.I. Landsman, The Apocalypse of Abraham. Edit-ed, with a Translation from the Slavonic Text and Notes (TED, 1.10; London, New York: The Macmillan Company, 1918) xv–xix; B. Philonenko-Sayar and 189
© 2015 State University of New York

NotesIntroduction1. On this conceptual development see J. Dan, “Samael, Lilith, and the Concept of Evil in Early Kabbalah,” AJSR 5 (1980) 17–40; M. Idel, “The Evil Thought of the Deity,” Ta r b i z 49 (1980) 356–364 [Hebrew]; G. Scholem, “The Kabbalah of R. Jacob and R. Isaac, the Sons of R. Jacob ha-Kohen,” Maddacei ha-Yahadut 2 (1927) 165–293 [Hebrew]; idem, “Sitra Ahra: Good and Evil in the Kabbalah,” in: On the Mystical Shape of the Godhead: Basic Concepts in the Kabbalah (New York: Schocken, 1991) 56–87; I. Tishby, The Doctrine of Evil and the “Kelippah” in Lurianic Kabbalism (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1984) [Hebrew]; idem, The Wisdom of the Zohar: An Anthology of Texts (3 vols.; London: The Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 1989); E. R. Wolf-son, “Left Contained in the Right: A Study in Zoharic Hermeneutics,” AJSR 11 (1986) 27–52; idem, “Light through Darkness: The Ideal of Human Perfection in the Zohar,” HTR 81 (1988) 73–95. The Curses of Azazel1. The general scholarly consensus holds that the apocalypse was com-posed after 70 CE and before the end of the second century CE. The depiction of the destruction of the Temple in chapter 27 and the peculiar interest in the idea of the celestial sanctuary represented by the divine Chariot hint at the fact that the earthly sanctuary was no longer standing. Another significant chronological marker is established by the second century work—the Clemen-tine Recognitiones 32–33 which provides one of the earliest external references for the dating of the Apocalypse of Abraham. On the date of the Apocalypse of Abraham, see G.H. Box and J.I. Landsman, The Apocalypse of Abraham. Edit-ed, with a Translation from the Slavonic Text and Notes (TED, 1.10; London, New York: The Macmillan Company, 1918) xv–xix; B. Philonenko-Sayar and 189
© 2015 State University of New York
Heruntergeladen am 14.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781438455846-013/pdf?lang=de&srsltid=AfmBOorp1Kdns_oaRahGksVzhdLH19aehrHMq76vwh87OHeZfki47QKW
Button zum nach oben scrollen