Home History 3. The Noble Family
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

3. The Noble Family

View more publications by Princeton University Press
·3· THE NOBLE FAMILY MARRIAGE The nobilities of early modern Europe faced a constant dilemma: how to ensure the continuation of noble lineages without endangering the preservation of their landholdings. Large numbers of children would eliminate the danger of families' becoming extinct, but too many chil-dren could prove a threat to the economic stability of noble families. Most European nobilities chose to emphasize the preservation of noble property and therefore adopted inheritance systems based on primogen-iture to keep holdings intact. The question then arose as to what was to be done with the younger sons and daughters, who were precluded from inheriting. The solution to this problem varied from country to country, but many nobilities attempted to reduce the severity of the problem by limiting both the number of marriages and the size of families.1 In French noble families the eldest son generally inherited the bulk of his father's holdings, but in return he had to pay substantial cash settle-ments to his brothers and sisters. To prevent too great a strain on the family fortune, many nobles placed some of their children in church po-sitions, thereby removing the need to provide them with settlements. A large proportion of the younger sons never married, and when they died, their portions frequently reverted to their families.2 A similar but even more rigid system of family control was practiced by the Catholic Stiftsadel (nobles belonging to a cathedral chapter that elected the ruler of an ecclesiastical state) of Westphalia. Generally only eldest sons could marry and inherit estates. To compensate younger sons for their celibacy and lack of inheritance rights, Westphalian fami-lies provided them with a good education and then a secure office in the cathedral chapter, army, or bureaucracy. The Westphalian nobility's control over the marriages of its children was not limited to the number of marriages; even more important was the kind of marriages contracted, 1 For a detailed survey of noble inheritance patterns see J. P. Cooper, "Patterns of In-heritance and Settlement bv Great Landowners from the Fifteenth to the Eighteenth Cen-turies," in Family and Inheritance: Rural Society in Western Europe, ed. Jack Goody, Joan Thirsk, and E. P. Thompson (Cambridge, 1976), 192-327. 2 Cooper, "Patterns of Inheritance," 268-76; Robert F'orster, The Nobility of Toulouse in the Eighteenth Century: A Social and Economic Study (Baltimore, 1960), 120-30; Jean Meyer, La noblesse bretonneau XVIIIeSteele, 2 vols. (Paris, 1966), 1: 121-27. 35

·3· THE NOBLE FAMILY MARRIAGE The nobilities of early modern Europe faced a constant dilemma: how to ensure the continuation of noble lineages without endangering the preservation of their landholdings. Large numbers of children would eliminate the danger of families' becoming extinct, but too many chil-dren could prove a threat to the economic stability of noble families. Most European nobilities chose to emphasize the preservation of noble property and therefore adopted inheritance systems based on primogen-iture to keep holdings intact. The question then arose as to what was to be done with the younger sons and daughters, who were precluded from inheriting. The solution to this problem varied from country to country, but many nobilities attempted to reduce the severity of the problem by limiting both the number of marriages and the size of families.1 In French noble families the eldest son generally inherited the bulk of his father's holdings, but in return he had to pay substantial cash settle-ments to his brothers and sisters. To prevent too great a strain on the family fortune, many nobles placed some of their children in church po-sitions, thereby removing the need to provide them with settlements. A large proportion of the younger sons never married, and when they died, their portions frequently reverted to their families.2 A similar but even more rigid system of family control was practiced by the Catholic Stiftsadel (nobles belonging to a cathedral chapter that elected the ruler of an ecclesiastical state) of Westphalia. Generally only eldest sons could marry and inherit estates. To compensate younger sons for their celibacy and lack of inheritance rights, Westphalian fami-lies provided them with a good education and then a secure office in the cathedral chapter, army, or bureaucracy. The Westphalian nobility's control over the marriages of its children was not limited to the number of marriages; even more important was the kind of marriages contracted, 1 For a detailed survey of noble inheritance patterns see J. P. Cooper, "Patterns of In-heritance and Settlement bv Great Landowners from the Fifteenth to the Eighteenth Cen-turies," in Family and Inheritance: Rural Society in Western Europe, ed. Jack Goody, Joan Thirsk, and E. P. Thompson (Cambridge, 1976), 192-327. 2 Cooper, "Patterns of Inheritance," 268-76; Robert F'orster, The Nobility of Toulouse in the Eighteenth Century: A Social and Economic Study (Baltimore, 1960), 120-30; Jean Meyer, La noblesse bretonneau XVIIIeSteele, 2 vols. (Paris, 1966), 1: 121-27. 35
Downloaded on 9.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781400859283.35/html?srsltid=AfmBOopSl9G1ZE8A5emAYCzIMJikxoZbudtyW8KRzSUBUsbOEAO_G2Tj
Scroll to top button