Home Philosophy Chapter II. Sovereign Power
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter II. Sovereign Power

View more publications by Princeton University Press
The State and the Rule of Law
This chapter is in the book The State and the Rule of Law
CHAPTERIISovereign PowerThe Prince is not superior to the laws.—Duplessis-MornayThe earlymodern doctrine of power can be summed up in a word:sovereignty. Amid the most strident of the civil wars against Henry III,Jean Bodin articulated the doctrine, “A commonwealth [or republic] maybe defined as the rightly ordered government of a number of families, andof those things which are their common concern, by a sovereign power.”1A century later, it was restated dramatically by Charles Loyseau: “Sover-eignty is the defining moment and culmination of power, the momentwhen the State must come into being.”2The concepts of legitimate powerand of beneficent power are present in these early definitions. Supremepower, as Bodin defined it, is also, as Loyseau emphasized,the very es-sence of the state:“Sovereignty is the form which gives being to the state;it is inseparable from the state; without it, the state vanishes.”Is Sovereignty an Evil?Sovereign power does not have a very good reputation. It is often confusedwith absolutism. “The two concepts of sovereignty and absolutism wereforged together on the same anvil,” wrote Jacques Maritain.3Then as now,the doctrine of sovereignty served as a focal point for anti-statist charges;it appeared to represent an aggrandizement of the institution of the stateand a valorization of power, an interruption in the process of the witheringaway of the medieval state and of the devaluation of power that earlymodern political philosophy had initiated. For a long time, the ancientsand the Christians had fared well. The Greeks scrutinized the most inti-mate features of the political pathology and cataloged in detail the de-struction wrought by untempered power in the polis; their sages, fed up
© 2016 Princeton University Press, Princeton

CHAPTERIISovereign PowerThe Prince is not superior to the laws.—Duplessis-MornayThe earlymodern doctrine of power can be summed up in a word:sovereignty. Amid the most strident of the civil wars against Henry III,Jean Bodin articulated the doctrine, “A commonwealth [or republic] maybe defined as the rightly ordered government of a number of families, andof those things which are their common concern, by a sovereign power.”1A century later, it was restated dramatically by Charles Loyseau: “Sover-eignty is the defining moment and culmination of power, the momentwhen the State must come into being.”2The concepts of legitimate powerand of beneficent power are present in these early definitions. Supremepower, as Bodin defined it, is also, as Loyseau emphasized,the very es-sence of the state:“Sovereignty is the form which gives being to the state;it is inseparable from the state; without it, the state vanishes.”Is Sovereignty an Evil?Sovereign power does not have a very good reputation. It is often confusedwith absolutism. “The two concepts of sovereignty and absolutism wereforged together on the same anvil,” wrote Jacques Maritain.3Then as now,the doctrine of sovereignty served as a focal point for anti-statist charges;it appeared to represent an aggrandizement of the institution of the stateand a valorization of power, an interruption in the process of the witheringaway of the medieval state and of the devaluation of power that earlymodern political philosophy had initiated. For a long time, the ancientsand the Christians had fared well. The Greeks scrutinized the most inti-mate features of the political pathology and cataloged in detail the de-struction wrought by untempered power in the polis; their sages, fed up
© 2016 Princeton University Press, Princeton
Downloaded on 8.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781400821761-004/html?licenseType=restricted&srsltid=AfmBOooUSHzIAi9BXA1MV5Iim84Wv8H1o--sZ0oIcvEyrkcIqVREmR9D
Scroll to top button