Home History 1 The Construction of Collective Memory
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

1 The Construction of Collective Memory

Sites and Processes
View more publications by University of Washington Press
91 The Construction ofCollective MemorySites and Processesinvoking the memory of a “historical” past involves several different usages of the terms “past” and “history” that are often rhetorically conflated. As a result of that conflation of meanings, “the past” is often thought to be a transparent and unproblematic term. Everyday speech refers so readily to “the past” as equivalent to “history” (and many historians do so as well) that this may seem a trivial distinction. But this is a fallacious idea. The idea that the past is constantly extant and therefore known or knowable is an untenable one. We have, at minimum, three pasts: the grammatical past, the narrative past, and the historical narration of a past. The grammatical past is a feature of natural language: it is a statement made in a past tense (and there may be more than one such tense). The narrative past is a retelling of events in a past tense—a narration that may be openly imaginary or that may lay claim to reality. If verified by protocols relevant to the world of knowledge of its time, the latter type may graduate to recognition as a historical nar­ration of the past. But that status is always open to revision. Therefore, since “the past” is a reconstruction, so must history also be.1If a defender of the monumental view of the past argues that the pos­sibility of making true statements about “the past” exists, then knowledge of the past exists somewhere, and the true statement is drawn from that stock of knowledge. This implies that there is an entity, a matrix that holds said know ­ledge of all the past—a store increased every instant as the present slides into the past and today slips into yesterday. “The past” is thus implicitly defined as the sum of all such instants. But in our world, no living individual and no single archive or database contains or records such total knowledge. If it indeed does exist, we are already in that matrix and cannot know it.2 It follows, then, that as far as we humans are concerned, there is no “past” out there somewhere. We have to work to build a narrative of it. Once built, it has to be propagated and replicated; that is what gives us social memory. A modern subset of that is historical memory, whose institutional construction is the main theme of this book.
© 2019, University of Washington Press

91 The Construction ofCollective MemorySites and Processesinvoking the memory of a “historical” past involves several different usages of the terms “past” and “history” that are often rhetorically conflated. As a result of that conflation of meanings, “the past” is often thought to be a transparent and unproblematic term. Everyday speech refers so readily to “the past” as equivalent to “history” (and many historians do so as well) that this may seem a trivial distinction. But this is a fallacious idea. The idea that the past is constantly extant and therefore known or knowable is an untenable one. We have, at minimum, three pasts: the grammatical past, the narrative past, and the historical narration of a past. The grammatical past is a feature of natural language: it is a statement made in a past tense (and there may be more than one such tense). The narrative past is a retelling of events in a past tense—a narration that may be openly imaginary or that may lay claim to reality. If verified by protocols relevant to the world of knowledge of its time, the latter type may graduate to recognition as a historical nar­ration of the past. But that status is always open to revision. Therefore, since “the past” is a reconstruction, so must history also be.1If a defender of the monumental view of the past argues that the pos­sibility of making true statements about “the past” exists, then knowledge of the past exists somewhere, and the true statement is drawn from that stock of knowledge. This implies that there is an entity, a matrix that holds said know ­ledge of all the past—a store increased every instant as the present slides into the past and today slips into yesterday. “The past” is thus implicitly defined as the sum of all such instants. But in our world, no living individual and no single archive or database contains or records such total knowledge. If it indeed does exist, we are already in that matrix and cannot know it.2 It follows, then, that as far as we humans are concerned, there is no “past” out there somewhere. We have to work to build a narrative of it. Once built, it has to be propagated and replicated; that is what gives us social memory. A modern subset of that is historical memory, whose institutional construction is the main theme of this book.
© 2019, University of Washington Press
Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780295746234-005/html?licenseType=restricted&srsltid=AfmBOooHXOiqb6VaYARW90IiL6reuhlhILIHkG3d2LKNDkH0lBPsOV2H
Scroll to top button