Abstract
A growing body of literature reports evidence of social interaction effects in survey expectations. In this note, we argue that evidence in favor of social interaction effects should be treated with caution, or could even be spurious. Utilizing a parsimonious stochastic model of expectation formation and dynamics, we show that the existing sample sizes of survey expectations are about two orders of magnitude too small to reasonably distinguish between noise and interaction effects. Moreover, we argue that the problem is compounded by the fact that highly correlated responses among agents might not be caused by interaction effects at all, but instead by model-consistent beliefs. Ultimately, these results suggest that existing survey data cannot facilitate our understanding of the process of expectations formation.
©2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Article
- Introduction to the Current Issue
- An Experimental Study on Expectations and Learning in Overlapping Generations Models
- Asset Pricing with Heterogeneous Investment Horizons
- The Fiscal Cost of Financial Instability
- Microfounded Animal Spirits in the New Macroeconomic Consensus
- Identification of Interaction Effects in Survey Expectations: A Cautionary Note
- Heterogeneous Learning Dynamics and Speed of Convergence
- Effects of Inflation Expectations on Macroeconomic Dynamics: Extrapolative Versus Regressive Expectations
Articles in the same Issue
- Article
- Introduction to the Current Issue
- An Experimental Study on Expectations and Learning in Overlapping Generations Models
- Asset Pricing with Heterogeneous Investment Horizons
- The Fiscal Cost of Financial Instability
- Microfounded Animal Spirits in the New Macroeconomic Consensus
- Identification of Interaction Effects in Survey Expectations: A Cautionary Note
- Heterogeneous Learning Dynamics and Speed of Convergence
- Effects of Inflation Expectations on Macroeconomic Dynamics: Extrapolative Versus Regressive Expectations