Home Law TWO. Our Eugenics Past
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

TWO. Our Eugenics Past

View more publications by Yale University Press
The New Eugenics
This chapter is in the book The New Eugenics
28twoOur Eugenics PastShould a despised and discredited movement that gained mo-mentum a century ago and faltered after World War II play any role in the discussion of technologies invented long after historians declared the movement “a permanent stain on the national record”?1 While advocacy abounds urging burial and nonres-urrection of the shameful period in U.S. history known as the American eugenics movement (circa 1890s to 1940s), equally compelling argu-ments suggest that only through contemporary refl ection on the factors that enabled the movement’s fl ourishing will we be prepared to guard against history repeating itself.2 The notion of a 1900s-style eugenics re-vival is not presented as a concern in any literal sense; few worry that modern-day Americans would respond favorably to scientifi c assertions about improving the human condition by organizing a web of state-sponsored programs that assess, suppress, deprive, and encourage re-production according to one’s expressed and inherited characteristics. The goal of revisiting our eugenics past is to plumb this half-century period for the motivations, patterns, strategies, and language that drew in so many, so that we might recognize our current selves in the ghosts of our past.Searching the parameters of a movement that targeted, in the main, natural reproduction for lessons about modern methods of as-
© Yale University Press, New Haven

28twoOur Eugenics PastShould a despised and discredited movement that gained mo-mentum a century ago and faltered after World War II play any role in the discussion of technologies invented long after historians declared the movement “a permanent stain on the national record”?1 While advocacy abounds urging burial and nonres-urrection of the shameful period in U.S. history known as the American eugenics movement (circa 1890s to 1940s), equally compelling argu-ments suggest that only through contemporary refl ection on the factors that enabled the movement’s fl ourishing will we be prepared to guard against history repeating itself.2 The notion of a 1900s-style eugenics re-vival is not presented as a concern in any literal sense; few worry that modern-day Americans would respond favorably to scientifi c assertions about improving the human condition by organizing a web of state-sponsored programs that assess, suppress, deprive, and encourage re-production according to one’s expressed and inherited characteristics. The goal of revisiting our eugenics past is to plumb this half-century period for the motivations, patterns, strategies, and language that drew in so many, so that we might recognize our current selves in the ghosts of our past.Searching the parameters of a movement that targeted, in the main, natural reproduction for lessons about modern methods of as-
© Yale University Press, New Haven
Downloaded on 14.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.12987/9780300229035-004/html?srsltid=AfmBOoqqkejB6fPiigZSxBG3am6V-3LNcLux1sR-C1ZQhsZA-4IHNOs0
Scroll to top button