Phonetic Realisation and Phonemic Categorisation of the Final Reduced Corner Vowels in the Finnic Languages of Ingria

References

1 AndersonC (2016): Consonant colour and vocalism in the history of Irish. PhD diss. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań.Search in Google Scholar

2 Baker, A., Archangeli, D., & Mielke, J. (2011). Variability in American English s-retraction suggests a solution to the actuation problem.Language Variation and Change, 23(3), 347–374. 10.1017/S09543945110001350954-3945Search in Google Scholar

3 Barnes, J. (2006). Strength and weakness at the interface: Positional neutralisation in phonetics and phonology. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

4 Baudouin de Courtenay, J. N. (1895). Versuch einer Theorie phonetischer Alternationen: ein Capitel aus der Psychophonetik. Strassburg: K.J. Trübner.10.1515/9783111472317Search in Google Scholar

5 Blevins, J. (2004). Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486357Search in Google Scholar

6 Blythe, R. A., & Croft, W. (2012). S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change.Language, 88(2), 269–304. 10.1353/lan.2012.00270097-8507Search in Google Scholar

7 Brohan, A., & Mielke, J. (2018). Frequent segmental alternations in P-base 3. In L.Hyman & F.Plank (Eds.),Phonological typology (pp. 196–228). Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110451931-006Search in Google Scholar

8 Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511612886Search in Google Scholar

9 Bybee, J. (2015). Language change. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139096768Search in Google Scholar

10 Bybee, J., File-Muriel, R. J., & de Souza, R. N. (2016). Special reduction: A usage-based approach.Language and Cognition, 8(3), 421–446. 10.1017/langcog.2016.191866-9808Search in Google Scholar

11 Crosswhite, K. (2004). Vowel reduction. In B.Hayes, R.Kirchner, & D.Steriade (Eds.),Phonetically-based phonology (pp. 191–231). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486401.007Search in Google Scholar

12 Davis, T., & Poldrack, R. A. (2014). Quantifying the internal structure of categories using a neural typicality measure.Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.), 24(7), 1720–1737. 10.1093/cercor/bht0141047-3211Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13 de Lacy, P. (2006). Markedness: Reduction and preservation in phonology. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486388Search in Google Scholar

14 Delattre, P. (1969). An acoustic and articulatory study of vowel reduction in four languages.International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 7(4), 295–325. 10.1515/iral.1969.7.4.2950019-042XSearch in Google Scholar

15 Eulitz, C., & Obleser, J. (2007). Perception of acoustically complex phonological features in vowels is reflected in the induced brain-magnetic activity.Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3(1), 26. 10.1186/1744-9081-3-261744-9081Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16 FlemmingE (1995): Auditory representations in phonology. PhD diss. UCLA.Search in Google Scholar

17 Flemming, E. (2004). Contrast and perceptual distinctiveness. In B.Hayes, R.Kirchner, & D.Steriade (Eds.),Phonetically-based phonology (pp. 232–276). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486401.008Search in Google Scholar

18 Greene, D. (1973). The growth of palatalisation in Irish.Transactions of the Philological Society, 72(1), 127–136. 10.1111/j.1467-968X.1973.tb01017.x0079-1636Search in Google Scholar

19 GureckisTM, GoldstoneRL (2008): The effect of the internal structure of categories on perception.Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, 1876–81.Search in Google Scholar

20 HallKC, HumeE, JaegerFT, WedelA (to appear): The message shapes phonology. Available online at: https://www.academia.edu/29087504Search in Google Scholar

21 Hanique, I., Ernestus, M., & Boves, L. (2015). Choice and pronunciation of words: Individual differences within a homogeneous group of speakers.Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(1), 161–185. 10.1515/cllt-2014-00251613-7027Search in Google Scholar

22 Harris, J. (2005). Vowel reduction as information loss. In P.Carr, J.Durand, & C. J.Ewen (Eds.),Headhood, elements, specification and contrastivity: Phonological papers in honour of John Anderson (pp. 119–132). John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/cilt.259.10harSearch in Google Scholar

23 Hay, J., & Foulkes, P. (2016). The evolution of medial /t/ over real and remembered time.Language, 92(2), 298–330. 10.1353/lan.2016.00360097-8507Search in Google Scholar

24 Hyman, L. M. (1976). Phonologisation. In A.Juilland (Ed.),Linguistic studies presented to Joseph H. Greenberg (pp. 407–418). Saratoga: Anma Libri.Search in Google Scholar

25 JohnsonK (2015): Vowel perception asymmetry in auditory and phonemic listening. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report 2015. Available online at https://escholarship.org/uc/item/21t337g10.5070/P721T337GHSearch in Google Scholar

26 Kapatsinski, V. (2018). Changing minds changing tools: From learning theory to language acquisition to language change. MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/11400.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

27 KiparskyV (1963): Russische historische Grammatik. Band. I: Die Entwicklung des Lautsystems. Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar

28 KirbyJP (2010): Cue selection and category restructuring in sound change. PhD diss. University of Chicago.Search in Google Scholar

29 KirchnerRM (1998): An effort-based approach to consonant lenition. PhD diss. UCLA.Search in Google Scholar

30 Klatt, D. H., & Klatt, L. C. (1990). Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87(2), 820–857. 10.1121/1.3988940001-4966Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31 Kochetov, A. (2011). Palatalisation. In M.van Oostendorp, C. J.Ewen, K.Rice, & E. V.Hume (Eds.),The Blackwell companion to phonology (Vol. 3, pp. 1666–1690). John Wiley and Sons.Search in Google Scholar

32 KrämerM, UrekO (2016): Perspectives on palatalisation. Glossa 1(1):31.1–17.Search in Google Scholar

33 Kruszewski, N. V. (1883). Očerk nauki o jazyke. Kazanj.Search in Google Scholar

34 KuznetsovaN (2009): Fonologičeskie sistemy ižorskih dialektov. PhD diss. St. Peterburg: Institut lingvističeskih issledovanij RAN.Search in Google Scholar

35 KuznetsovaN (2011): Typology of prosodic systems in Low Luga Izhorian varieties. In: Austin PK, Bond O, Charette M, Nathan D, Sells P (eds). Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 2. London: SOAS, pp 185–192.Search in Google Scholar

36 KuznetsovaN (2012a) Prosodika slovoformy v nižnelužskom dialekte ižorskogo jazyka. Acta linguistica Petro¬politana VIII(1):43–103.Search in Google Scholar

37 KuznetsovaN (2012b): Vowel reduction in Lower Luga Ingrian: scientific description and “folk” perception. ‘Folk linguistics’: Language from speakers’ perspective: Paper abstracts for the conference, St. Petersburg, November 19–21. St. Petersburg, 85–7.Search in Google Scholar

38 KuznetsovaN, SidorkevičD (2012): Priloženie 6: Karty k statjam. Acta linguistica Petropolitana VIII(1):559–67.Search in Google Scholar

39 Kuznetsova, N. (2015). Two phonological rarities in Ingrian dialects. In M.Hilpert, J.Duke, Ch.Mertzlufft, J.-O.Östman, & M.Rießler (Eds.),New trends in Nordic and general linguistics (pp. 91–117). Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

40 Kuznetsova, N. (2016). Evolution of the non-initial vocalic length contrast across Finnic varieties of Ingria and the adjacent areas.Linguistica Uralica, 52(1), 1–25. 10.3176/lu.2016.1.01Search in Google Scholar

41 Kuznetsova, N., Markus, E., & Muslimov, M. (2015). Finnic minorities of Ingria: The current sociolinguistic situation and its background. In H.Marten, M.Riessler, J.Saarikivi, & R.Toivanen (Eds.),Cultural and linguistic minorities in the Russian Federation and the European Union (pp. 127–167). Berlin: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

42 Laanest, A. (1980). Inkeroismurteiston suhteista suomen kaakkoismurteisiin.Virittäjä, 84, 142–149.Search in Google Scholar

43 LabovW (1999): Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 1: Internal factors. Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

44 Labov, W., Karen, M., & Miller, C. (1991). Near-mergers and the suspension of phonemic contrast.Language Variation and Change, 3(1), 33–74. 10.1017/S09543945000004420954-3945Search in Google Scholar

45 Laver, J. (1994). Principles of phonetics. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166621Search in Google Scholar

46 LeppikM (1975): Ingerisoome kurgola murde fonoloogilise süsteemi kujunemine. Tallinn: Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia, Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.Search in Google Scholar

47 Leskinen, H. (1973). Kaakkoissuomalaisen loppuheiton yleisyydestä ja alkuperästä.Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Aikakauskirja, 72, 210–221.Search in Google Scholar

48 Lindblom, B. (1963). Spectrographic study of vowel reduction.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35(11), 1773–1781. 10.1121/1.19188160001-4966Search in Google Scholar

49 Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In W. J.Hardcastle & A.Marchal (Eds.),Speech production and speech modelling (pp. 403–439). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16Search in Google Scholar

50 MägisteJ (1925): Rosona (Eesti Ingeri) murde pääjooned. Tartu.Search in Google Scholar

51 Manca, A. D., & Grimaldi, M. (2016). Vowels and consonants in the brain: Evidence from magnetoencephalographic studies on the N1m in normal-hearing listeners.Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1413. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.014131664-1078Search in Google Scholar PubMed

52 MarkusE, RožanskijF (2011): Sovremennyj vodskij jazyk. Teksty i grammatičeskij očerk. Vol. 2. Sankt-Peterburg: Nestor-Istorija.Search in Google Scholar

53 Matthies, M., Perrier, P., Perkell, J. S., & Zandipour, M. (2001). Variation in anticipatory coarticulation with changes in clarity and rate.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 44(2), 340–353. 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/028)1092-4388Search in Google Scholar PubMed

54 Maye, J., & Gerken, L. (2000). Learning phonemes without minimal pairs.Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 24(2), 522–533.Search in Google Scholar

55 MielkeJ (2008): The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford University press. PBase available from http://pbase.phon.chass.ncsu.edu, last accessed on 01.10.2018.Search in Google Scholar

56 Mompeán-González, J. A. (2004). Category overlap and neutralisation: The importance of speakers’ classifications in phonology.Cognitive Linguistics, 15(4), 429–469. 10.1515/cogl.2004.15.4.4290936-5907Search in Google Scholar

57 MuslimovM (2005): Jazykovyje kontakty v Zapadnoj Ingermanlandii (nižnee tečenije reki Lugi). PhD diss. Sankt-Peterburg: Institut lingvističeskih issledovanij RAN.Search in Google Scholar

58 Nirvi, R. E. (1972). Siperian inkeriläisten murteesta ja alkuperästä.Kotiseutu, 2/3, 92–95.0047-3677Search in Google Scholar

59 Ohala, J. J. (1989). Sound change is drawn from a pool of synchronic variation. In L. E.Breivik & E. H.Jahr (Eds.),Language change: Contributions to the study of its causes (pp. 173–198). Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110853063.173Search in Google Scholar

60 Olejarczuk, P., Kapatsinski, V., & Baayen, R. H. (2018). Distributional learning is error-driven: The role of surprise in the acquisition of phonetic categories.Linguistics Vanguard : Multimodal Online Journal, 4(s2, S2). 10.1515/lingvan-2017-00202199-174XSearch in Google Scholar

61 PearceM (2008): Vowel harmony domains and vowel undershoot. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 20:115–40.Search in Google Scholar

62 Polka, L., & Bohn, O. S. (2003). Asymmetries in vowel perception.Speech Communication, 41(1), 221–231. 10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00105-X0167-6393Search in Google Scholar

63 Polka, L., & Bohn, O. S. (2011). Natural Referent Vowel (NRV) framework: An emerging view of early phonetic development.Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 467–478. 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.0070095-4470Search in Google Scholar

64 Cohen Priva, U. (2017). Informativity and the actuation of lenition.Language, 93(3), 569–597. 10.1353/lan.2017.00370097-8507Search in Google Scholar

65 RitterS, MückeD, GriceM (2018): The dynamics of intonation: categorical and continuous variation in an attractor-based model (preprint). Available online at https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qkm6b.Search in Google Scholar

66 Roettger, T. B., Winter, B., Grawunder, S., Kirby, J., & Grice, M. (2014). Assessing incomplete neutralisation of final devoicing in German.Journal of Phonetics, 43, 11–25. 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.01.0020095-4470Search in Google Scholar

67 Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorisation. In E.Rosch & B. B.Lloyd (Eds.),Cognition and categorisation (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

68 Šahmatov, A. A. (1915). Očerk drevneišego perioda istorii russkogo jazyka. Petrograd.Search in Google Scholar

69 SidorkevičDV (2013): Jazyk ingermanlandskih pereselencev XIX v. v Sibiri (struktura, dialektnye osobennosti, kontaktnye javlenija. PhD diss. Sankt-Peterburg: Institut lingvističeskih issledovanij RAN. Stevens KN (2004): Invariance and variability in speech: Interpreting acoustic evidence. In: Slifka J, Manuel S, Matthies M (eds). From sound to sense: 50+ years of discoveries in speech communication. Cambridge, MA: Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT, pp B-77–B-85.Search in Google Scholar

70 Stevens, K. N. (2004). Invariance and variability in speech: Interpreting acoustic evidence. In J. Slifka, S. Manuel, & M. Matthies (Eds), From sound to sense: 50+ years of discoveries in speech communication (pp. B-77–B-85). Cambridge, MA: Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT.Search in Google Scholar

71 Stevens, M., & Harrington, J. (2014). The individual and the actuation of sound change.Loquens, 1(1), e003. 10.3989/loquens.2014.0032386-2637Search in Google Scholar

72 Szeredi, D. (2010). Vowel centralisation and vowel harmony in Hungarian.The Odd Yearbook, 8, 111–137.Search in Google Scholar

73 Teras, P., & Pajusalu, K. (2014). Palatalisatsioonist ja prepalatalisatsioonist spontaanses eesti keeles.Keel ja Kirjandus, 4, 257–269.10.54013/kk677a1Search in Google Scholar

74 Traunmüller, H., & Öhrström, N. (2007). Audiovisual perception of openness and lip rounding in front vowels.Journal of Phonetics, 35(2), 244–258. 10.1016/j.wocn.2006.03.0020095-4470Search in Google Scholar

75 Uchanski, R. M. (2005). Clear speech. In D. B.Pisoni & R. E.Remez (Eds.),The handbook of speech perception (pp. 207–235). Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470757024.ch9Search in Google Scholar

76 Vallabha, G. K., McClelland, J. L., Pons, F., Werker, J. F., & Amano, S. (2007). Unsupervised learning of vowel categories from infant-directed speech.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(33), 13273–13278. 10.1073/pnas.07053691040027-8424Search in Google Scholar PubMed

77 van Bergem, D. R. (1995). Perceptual and acoustic aspects of lexical vowel reduction, a sound change in progress.Speech Communication, 16(4), 329–358. 10.1016/0167-6393(95)00003-70167-6393Search in Google Scholar

78 van der Hulst, H. (2018). Asymmetries in vowel harmony: A representational account. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198813576.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

79 Vatakis, A., Maragos, P., Rodomagoulakis, I., & Spence, C. (2012). Assessing the effect of physical differences in the articulation of consonants and vowels on audiovisual temporal perception.Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 71. 10.3389/fnint.2012.000711662-5145Search in Google Scholar PubMed

80 Walker, R. (2011). Vowel patterns in language. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511973710Search in Google Scholar

81 Wanrooij, K., Escudero, P., & Raijmakers, M. E. (2013). What do listeners learn from exposure to a vowel distribution? An analysis of listening strategies in distributional learning.Journal of Phonetics, 41(5), 307–319. 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.03.0050095-4470Search in Google Scholar

82 YuAC (2013): Socio-cognitive processing and the actuation of Sound change. In: Yu AC (ed). Origins of sound change: Approaches to phonologisation. Oxford University Press, pp 201–227.Search in Google Scholar