The Source-Filter Frame of Prominence
-
Gunnar Fant
, Anita Kruckenberg und Johan Liljencrants
Abstract
One aim of our study is to discuss some of the relations of prosodic parameters to the speech production process, e.g. how speech intensity is related to the vocal tract filter and the voice source and the underlying aerodynamics. A specific problem of phonetic interest is the role of subglottal pressure and fundamental frequency as intensity determinants and their covariation in speech. Our speech analysis displays, incorporating perceptually scaled syllable prominence, are suitable for multilevel studies of speech parameters. A new intensity parameter, SPLH, related to sonority is introduced. In combination with the standard sound pressure level it provides information on the voice source spectral slope. In Swedish, high long stressed vowels approach a semi-closed target, and thus a sonority minimum, which suggests a motor component in prominence perception.
verified
References
1 Bickley, C.; Stevens, K.N.: Effects of a vocal tract constriction on the glottal source: experimental and modelling studies. J. Phonet. 14: 373–382 (1986).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30711-9Suche in Google Scholar
2 Campbell, N.; Beckman, M.: Stress, prominence and spectral tilt; in Botinis, Kouroupetroglou, Carayannis, Proc. ESCA Workshop on Intonation: Theory, Models and Applications, Athens 1997, pp. 67–70.Suche in Google Scholar
3 Dilley, L.; Shattuck-Hufnagel, S.: Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. J. Phonet. 24: No. 4 (1996).10.1006/jpho.1996.0023Suche in Google Scholar
4 Fant, G.: Acoustic analysis and synthesis of speech with applications to Swedish. Ericsson Technics, No. 15/1, pp. 1–106 (1959).Suche in Google Scholar
5 Fant, G.: Voice source dynamics. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 2/3, pp. 17–37 (1980).Suche in Google Scholar
6 Fant, G.: Some problems in voice source analysis. Speech Commun. 13: 7–22 (1993).10.1016/0167-6393(93)90055-PSuche in Google Scholar
7 Fant, G.: The LF-model revisited. Transformations and frequency domain analysis. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 2/3, pp. 119–155 (1995).Suche in Google Scholar
8 Fant, G.: The voice source in connected speech. Speech Commun. 22: 125–139 (1997).10.1016/S0167-6393(97)00017-4Suche in Google Scholar
9 Fant, G.; Hertegård, S.; Kruckenberg, A.; Liljencrants, J.: Covariation of subglottal pressure, F0 and glottal parameters. Eurospeech 97: 453–456 (1997a).10.21437/Eurospeech.1997-156Suche in Google Scholar
10 Fant, G.; Kruckenberg, A.: Preliminaries to the study of Swedish prose reading and reading style. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 2, pp. 1–89 (1989).Suche in Google Scholar
11 Fant, G.; Kruckenberg, A.: Notes on stress and word accent in Swedish. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 2/3, pp. 125–144 (1994).Suche in Google Scholar
12 Fant, G.; Kruckenberg, A.: The voice source in prosody. Proc. ICPhS 95, Stockholm 1995, Vol. 2, pp. 622–625.Suche in Google Scholar
13 Fant, G.; Kruckenberg, A.: Voice source properties of the speech code. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 4, pp. 45–46 (1996).Suche in Google Scholar
14 Fant, G.; Kruckenberg, A.; Liljencrants, J.: Prominence correlates in Swedish prosody. Int. Conf. Phonet. Sci. 99, San Francisco 1999, pp. 1749–1752.Suche in Google Scholar
15 Fant, G.; Kruckenberg, A.; Liljencrants, J.: Acoustic-phonetic correlates of prosody in Swedish; in Botinis, Intonation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000).Fant, G.; Kruckenberg, A.; Nord, L.: Prosodic and segmental speaker variations. Speech Commun. 10: 521–531 (1991).Suche in Google Scholar
16 Fant, G.; Kruckenberg, A.; Hertegård, S.; Liljencrants, J.: Accentuation and subglottal pressure in Swedish; in Botinis, Kouroupetroglou, Carayannis, Proc. ESCA Workshop on Intonation: Therory, Models and Applications, Athens 1997b, pp. 111–114.Suche in Google Scholar
17 Fant, G.; Liljencrants, J.; Lin, Q.: A four-parameter model of glottal flow. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 4, pp. 1–13 (1985).Suche in Google Scholar
18 Fant, G.; Lin, Q.: Frequency domain interpretation and derivation of glottal flow parameters. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 2/3, pp. 1–21 (1988).Suche in Google Scholar
19 Fant, G.; Nord, L.; Kruckenberg, A.: Individual variations in text reading: a data-bank pilot study. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 4, pp. 1–17 (1986).Suche in Google Scholar
20 Kruckenberg, A.; Fant, G.: Iambic versus trochaic patterns in poetry reading. Nordic Prosody VI, pp. 123–135 (Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm 1993).Suche in Google Scholar
21 Lindblom, B.: Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H and H theory; in Hardcastle, Marchal, Speech production and modelling, pp. 403–439 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1990).10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16Suche in Google Scholar
22 Marcus, S.M.: Acoustic determinants of perceptual center (P-center) location. Perception Psychophysics 30: 247–256 (1981).10.3758/BF03214280Suche in Google Scholar
23 Portele, T.; Heuft, B.: Towards a prominence-based synthesis system. Speech Commun. 21: 1–72 (1997).10.1016/S0167-6393(96)00072-6Suche in Google Scholar
24 Sluijter, A.M.C.; van Heuven, V.J.: Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 100: 2471–2484 (1996).10.1121/1.417955Suche in Google Scholar
25 Sundberg, J.; Andersson, M.; Hultqvist, C.: Effect of subglottal pressure variation on professional baritone singers’ voice sources. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 105: 1965–1971 (1999).10.1121/1.426731Suche in Google Scholar
26 Titze, I.: On the relation between subglottal pressure and fundamental frequency in phonation. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 85: 901–906 (1989).10.1121/1.397562Suche in Google Scholar
© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Special Section
- Title Page
- Foreword
- Acoustic Patterning of Speech Its Linguistic and Physiological Bases
- Investigating Unscripted Speech: Implications for Phonetics and Phonology
- Emotive Transforms
- The Source-Filter Frame of Prominence
- The C/D Model and Prosodic Control of Articulatory Behavior
- Diverse Acoustic Cues at Consonantal Landmarks
- Perceptual Processing
- Modeling and Perception of ‘Gesture Reduction’
- General Auditory Processes Contribute to Perceptual Accommodation of Coarticulation
- Adaptive Dispersion in Vowel Perception
- Language Acquisition as Complex Category Formation
- Biology of Communication and Motor Processes
- Singing Birds, Playing Cats, and Babbling Babies: Why Do They Do It?
- The Phonetic Potential of Nonhuman Vocal Tracts: Comparative Cineradiographic Observations of Vocalizing Animals
- Dynamic Simulation of Human Movement Using Large-Scale Models of the Body
- En Route to Adult Spoken Language / Language Development
- An Embodiment Perspective on the Acquisition of Speech Perception
- Speech to Infants as Hyperspeech: Knowledge-Driven Processes in Early Word Recognition
- The Construction of a First Phonology
- Auditory Constraints on Sound Structures
- Searching for an Auditory Description of Vowel Categories
- Commentary
- Imitation and the Emergence of Segments
- Deriving Speech from Nonspeech: A View from Ontogeny
- Paper
- Developmental Origins of Adult Phonology: The Interplay between Phonetic Emergents and the Evolutionary Adaptations of Sound Patterns
- Further Section
- Publications Björn Lindblom
- Index autorum Vol. 57, 2000
- Contents Vol. 57, 2000
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Special Section
- Title Page
- Foreword
- Acoustic Patterning of Speech Its Linguistic and Physiological Bases
- Investigating Unscripted Speech: Implications for Phonetics and Phonology
- Emotive Transforms
- The Source-Filter Frame of Prominence
- The C/D Model and Prosodic Control of Articulatory Behavior
- Diverse Acoustic Cues at Consonantal Landmarks
- Perceptual Processing
- Modeling and Perception of ‘Gesture Reduction’
- General Auditory Processes Contribute to Perceptual Accommodation of Coarticulation
- Adaptive Dispersion in Vowel Perception
- Language Acquisition as Complex Category Formation
- Biology of Communication and Motor Processes
- Singing Birds, Playing Cats, and Babbling Babies: Why Do They Do It?
- The Phonetic Potential of Nonhuman Vocal Tracts: Comparative Cineradiographic Observations of Vocalizing Animals
- Dynamic Simulation of Human Movement Using Large-Scale Models of the Body
- En Route to Adult Spoken Language / Language Development
- An Embodiment Perspective on the Acquisition of Speech Perception
- Speech to Infants as Hyperspeech: Knowledge-Driven Processes in Early Word Recognition
- The Construction of a First Phonology
- Auditory Constraints on Sound Structures
- Searching for an Auditory Description of Vowel Categories
- Commentary
- Imitation and the Emergence of Segments
- Deriving Speech from Nonspeech: A View from Ontogeny
- Paper
- Developmental Origins of Adult Phonology: The Interplay between Phonetic Emergents and the Evolutionary Adaptations of Sound Patterns
- Further Section
- Publications Björn Lindblom
- Index autorum Vol. 57, 2000
- Contents Vol. 57, 2000