Home Linguistics & Semiotics Resultative passives in Finnish
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Resultative passives in Finnish

  • Satu Manninen
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Approaches to Hungarian
This chapter is in the book Approaches to Hungarian

Abstract

In this article, I argue that Finnish passive participles (e.g. avattu ‘opened’ and suljettu ‘closed’) can be multiply ambiguous: the “same” morphophonological forms exhibit different patterns of eventivity and agentivity, and are used to form “traditional” non-agreeing passives, agreeing resultative passives, and agreeing sentences that describe “pure” states and behave in most contexts like traditional copula-adjective constructions. I show that in Finnish, Participle Phrases that look similar on the outside can be formed in different ways, and that these Participle Phrases are selected by different superordinate heads, to form either a non-agreeing passive, an agreeing resultative, or a “pure” stative sentence.

Abstract

In this article, I argue that Finnish passive participles (e.g. avattu ‘opened’ and suljettu ‘closed’) can be multiply ambiguous: the “same” morphophonological forms exhibit different patterns of eventivity and agentivity, and are used to form “traditional” non-agreeing passives, agreeing resultative passives, and agreeing sentences that describe “pure” states and behave in most contexts like traditional copula-adjective constructions. I show that in Finnish, Participle Phrases that look similar on the outside can be formed in different ways, and that these Participle Phrases are selected by different superordinate heads, to form either a non-agreeing passive, an agreeing resultative, or a “pure” stative sentence.

Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/atoh.13.09man/pdf
Scroll to top button