Plains Cree Order as alternation
-
und
Abstract
This paper describes the Plains Cree phenomenon of Order as a form of alternation not yet described as such in the literature. First, we provide a brief description of relevant Plains Cree grammar and Order as a phenomenon. This is followed by an overview of how the concept of alternation has been used in linguistics as an analytic tool. Finally, we discuss how conceiving of Order as an alternation allows for not only a better understanding of the phenomenon, but also results in a new type of alternation. We name this type of alternation a paradigmatic alternation and define it as any alternation where some lexeme can make use of two or more alternative paradigms of the same size and shape but with different morphological exponents, while representing the same set of grammatical features. We exemplify this with Plains Cree, where subject/object agreement has two distinct paradigms which verbs can take while retaining similar meanings. A brief comparison with of a similar phenomenon, Koiari tense/aspect, is also included.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the contributions of Katherine Schmirler, Arok Wolvengrey, Jordan Lachler, and the anonymous reviewers for the helpful comments and discussion they have provided in preparing this research. We would also like to thank the organizers of the “What counts as an alternation in usage-based construction grammar? Workshop” at the 11th International Conference on Construction Grammar for hosting the workshop that inspired this paper. This work has been funded by a Partnership Grant (#895-2019-1012), as well as a personal doctoral fellowship (Harrigan), both from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada. A special thanks to all of the Plains Cree speakers with whom we have worked with while completing this research, particularly those from Maskwacîs, AB.
References
Arppe, A. 2008. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate methods in corpus-based lexicography: A study of synonymy. Publications of the Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki, No. 44. PhD dissertation. URN: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-10-5175-3.Suche in Google Scholar
Arppe, A. 2009. Linguistic choices vs. probabilities–how much and what can linguistic theory explain? In S. Featherston & S. Winkler (eds.), The fruits of empirical linguistics, vol. 1, 1–24. De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110216141.1Suche in Google Scholar
Arppe, A., A. G. Harrigan, K. Schmirler, D. Dacanay & R. Makinaw. 2023. Nêhiyawi-pîkiskwêwina maskwacîsihk : Spoken dictionary of maskwacîs Cree. Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America 44(2). 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1353/dic.2023.a915068.Suche in Google Scholar
Biber, D., S. Conrad & R. Reppen. 1998. Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804489Suche in Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. 1946. Algonquian. In H. Hoijer, L. Bloomfield, M. R. Haas, A. M. Halpern, F. K. Li, S. S. Newman, M. Swadesh, G. L. Trager, C. F. Voegelin & B. L. Whorf (eds.), Linguistic structures of Native America, 85–129. New York: Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology.Suche in Google Scholar
Bresnan, J., A. Cueni, T. Nikitina & R. H. Baayen. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In G. Bouma, I. Kraemer & J. Zwarts (eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation, 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.Suche in Google Scholar
Cook, C. 2014. The clause-typing system of Plains Cree: Indexicality, anaphoricity, and contrast. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654536.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Cruse, D. A. 2000. Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, A. 2014. Plains Cree morphosyntax, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Dutton, T. E. 1996. Koiari. München, Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Suche in Google Scholar
Eberhard, D., G. F. Simons & D. C. Fennig (eds.). 2023. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 26th edn. Dallas: SIL International. Available at: https://www.ethnologue.com/language/crk/.Suche in Google Scholar
Edmonds, P. & G. Hirst. 2002. Near-synonymy and lexical choice. Computational Linguistics 28(2). 105–144. https://doi.org/10.1162/089120102760173625.Suche in Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. 2003. Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of particle placement. New York; London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar
Hanks, P. 2013. Lexical analysis: Norms and exploitations. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262018579.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Harrigan, A. G. forthcoming. A quantitative account of Nêhiyawêwin order: Using mixed-effects modelling to uncover syntactic, semantic, and morphological motivations in Nêhiyawêwin. Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta PhD thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Harrigan, A. G., K. Schmirler, A. Arppe, L. Antonsen, T. Trosterud & A. Wolvengrey. 2017. Learning from the computational modelling of Plains Cree verbs. Morphology 27(4). 565–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-017-9315-x.Suche in Google Scholar
Jacques, G. & A. Antonov. 2014. Direct/inverse systems. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(7). 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12079.Suche in Google Scholar
Jolley, C. 1983. Algonquian person hierarchy: Morphosyntactic or semantic? In W. Cowan (ed.), Actes du quatorziéme congrès des Algonquinistes, 281–292. Ottawa: Carleton University.Suche in Google Scholar
König, E. & P. Siemund. 2007. Speech act distinctions in grammar. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 1, 2nd edn., 276–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, chapter 5.10.1017/CBO9780511619427.005Suche in Google Scholar
Littlechild, M. J., L. Wildcat, J. Roasting, H. Simon, A. Lee, A. Makinaw, R. Rowan, R. Makinaw, Kisikaw, B. Simon, B. Lightning, B. Lee, L. Oldpan, M. Buffalo, D. Young, I. Raine, P. Makinaw, N. L. Saddleback, R. Makinaw, A. Harrigan, K. Schmirler, D. Bowers, M. Bontogon, L. Giesbrecht, P. Johnson, T. Mills, J. Lachler & A. Arppe. 2018. Towards a spoken dictionary of Maskwacîs Cree. Paper presented at the 25th Stabilizing Indigenous Languages Symposium, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada.Suche in Google Scholar
Okimāsis, J. L. 2018. Cree: Language of the Plains/nēhiyawēwin: paskwāwi-pı̄kiskwēwin, 3rd edn. Regina: University of Regina Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Pijpops, D. 2020. What is an alternation? Six answers. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34(1). 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00053.pij.Suche in Google Scholar
Ratt, S. 2016. Mâci-nêhiyawêwin/Beginning Cree. Regina, SK: University of Regina Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Suche in Google Scholar
Wolfart, H. C. 1973. Plains Cree: A grammatical study. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 63(5). 1–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/1006246.Suche in Google Scholar
Wolfart, H. C. 1996. Sketch of Cree, an Algonquian language. In I. Goddard (ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Languages, 17, 390–439. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Suche in Google Scholar
Wolvengrey, A. 2001. Nēhiyawēwin: itwēwina/Cree: Words. Regina: University of Regina Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Wolvengrey, A. 2005. Inversion and the absence of grammatical relations in plains cree. In C. de Groot & K. Hengeveld (eds.), Morphosyntactic expression in functional grammar, 419–446. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar
Wolvengrey, A. 2011. Semantic and pragmatic functions in Plains Cree syntax. Amsterdam: LOT.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Introduction: what are alternations and how should we study them?
- Concrete constructions or messy mangroves? How modelling contextual effects on constructional alternations reflect theoretical assumptions of language structure
- Alternations (at) that time: NP versus PP time adjuncts in the history of English
- Disentangling constructional networks: integrating taxonomic effects into the description of grammatical alternations
- The morphosyntactic alternation between exterior locative case affixes and postpositions in Estonian
- In alternations, not all semantic motivation comes from semantic contrast
- Null and overt se constructions in Brazilian Portuguese and the network of se constructions
- Evaluating the importance of construal for choosing between alternating forms: the case of Spanish change-of-state verbs hacerse and volverse
- Differential indexing in Kamang: a viewpoint alternation
- Plains Cree Order as alternation
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Introduction: what are alternations and how should we study them?
- Concrete constructions or messy mangroves? How modelling contextual effects on constructional alternations reflect theoretical assumptions of language structure
- Alternations (at) that time: NP versus PP time adjuncts in the history of English
- Disentangling constructional networks: integrating taxonomic effects into the description of grammatical alternations
- The morphosyntactic alternation between exterior locative case affixes and postpositions in Estonian
- In alternations, not all semantic motivation comes from semantic contrast
- Null and overt se constructions in Brazilian Portuguese and the network of se constructions
- Evaluating the importance of construal for choosing between alternating forms: the case of Spanish change-of-state verbs hacerse and volverse
- Differential indexing in Kamang: a viewpoint alternation
- Plains Cree Order as alternation
