A Levantine Archaeological Response: Thinking with Bourdieu though Limited Data and Explicit Assumptions
Abstract
This article is part of a special issue of the Journal of Ancient History, “Social Biographies of the Ancient World.” It serves as response paper whose purpose is to identify a core question underlying the three case studies in this special issue: does Bourdieu’s field theory help us to understand how people made decisions in the ancient world, given that its predictive capabilities will necessarily be limited by the information we have? To explore this question, the idea of “using theory” as a method is engaged, comparing premodern applications of Bourdieu’s core concepts to the limits of the scientific “theory of evolution.” A brief assessment of the strengths of the case studies in this special issue is followed by an articulation of several resulting take-aways: (i) the value of the concepts of field, capital, and habitus in focusing on our data and its limits, rather than academic ideologies; (ii) the importance of articulating each scholarly assumption explicitly as we apply these concepts; (iii) the recognition that we can use Bourdieu to reveal new interpretive possibilities but not to fill in missing data; and (iv) the productive assumption that each text from the ancient world was the result of an actor(s) leveraging their capital in order to negotiate their perceived optimal position within a field. Together these points illustrate the utility of this issue’s systematic approach to the application of Bourdieu’s field theory in the study of the ancient world.
Bibliography
Avneri Meir, R., J. Jokiranta and A. Spunaugle. “Functional differentiation in 1 Maccabees: exploring second century BCE Judean society through the character of Jonathan Apphus.” Journal of Ancient History 12 (2024): 281–299.Suche in Google Scholar
Benz, F. Personal Names in the Phoenician and Punic Inscriptions. Rome: Biblical Institute, 1972. Suche in Google Scholar
Binford, L. “General introduction.” In For Theory Building in Archaeology, edited L. Binford, 1–10. New York: Academic, 1977.Suche in Google Scholar
Binford, L. “Mortuary practices: their study and their potential.” Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology 25 (1971): 6–29.10.1017/S0081130000002525Suche in Google Scholar
Brubaker, R. “Rethinking classical theory: the sociological vision of Pierre Bourdieu.” In After Bourdieu, edited by D. Swartz and V. Zolberg, 25–64. Dordrecht: Springer, 2004.10.1007/1-4020-2589-0_3Suche in Google Scholar
Darby, E. “Can the subaltern’s artifacts speak? Excavating gender in the material culture of ancient Israel.” Unpublished conference paper, Society of Biblical Literature, 2019.Suche in Google Scholar
Dianteill, E. “Pierre Bourdieu and the sociology of religion: a central and peripheral concern.” In After Bourdieu, edited by D. Swartz and V. Zolberg, 65–85. Dordrecht: Springer, 2004.10.1007/1-4020-2589-0_4Suche in Google Scholar
Egan, M. and P. Tabar. “Bourdieu in Beirut: wasta, the state and social reproduction in Lebanon.” Middle East Critique 25 (2016): 249–270.10.1080/19436149.2016.1168662Suche in Google Scholar
Frede, S. Die Phönizischen anthropoiden Sarkophage. 2 vols. Mainz: von Zabern, 2000.Suche in Google Scholar
Hammer, D. “Bourdieu, ideology, and the ancient world.” American Journal of Semiotics 22 (2006): 87–108.10.5840/ajs2006221/45Suche in Google Scholar
Kletter, R. “In the footsteps of Bagira: ethnicity, archaeology, and ‘Iron Age I ethnic Israel.” Approaching Religion 4 (2014): 2–15.10.30664/ar.67545Suche in Google Scholar
Martin, S. The Art of Contact. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 2017.Suche in Google Scholar
Pfoh, E. “Ancient individuals and Bourdieu in context: a historical anthropological response.” Journal of Ancient History 12 (2024): 326–332.Suche in Google Scholar
Puech, É. “Un cratère phénicien inscrit: rites et croyances.” Transeuphratene 8 (1994): 47-73.Suche in Google Scholar
Saxe, A. Social Dimensions of Mortuary Practices. PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan, 1970.Suche in Google Scholar
Silverman, J., J.Töyräänvuori and M. Wasmuth. “Ahatabu and her stela (ÄM 7707): funerary habitus in Achaemenid Egypt.” Journal of Ancient History 12 (2024): 222–280.Suche in Google Scholar
Spunaugle, A. “Ancient Near Eastern field theory: adapting Bourdieu for social biographies of the ancient world.” Journal of Ancient History 12 (2024): 204–221.Suche in Google Scholar
Wallis, C., A. Aissaoui and N. Nikki. “Falling out with the in-laws. Understanding the Babatha archive with Pierre Bourdieu's field theory and theory of practice.” Journal of Ancient History 12 (2024): 300–325.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Social Biographies of the Ancient World. Studying Ahatabu, Jonathan, and Babatha through a Bourdieusian Approach: Towards a New Historiographical Habitus
- Ancient Near Eastern Field Theory: Adapting Bourdieu for Social Biographies of the Ancient World
- Ahatabu and her Stela (ÄM 7707): Funerary Habitus in Achaemenid Egypt
- Functional Differentiation in 1 Maccabees: Exploring Second Century BCE Judean Society Through the Character of Jonathan Apphus
- Falling Out with the In-Laws. Understanding the Babatha Archive with Pierre Bourdieu’s Field Theory and Theory of Practice.
- Ancient Individuals and Bourdieu in Context: A Historical Anthropological Response
- A Sociological Response: Challenging the Modernity-centrism of Pierre Bourdieu’s Field Approach
- A Levantine Archaeological Response: Thinking with Bourdieu though Limited Data and Explicit Assumptions
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Social Biographies of the Ancient World. Studying Ahatabu, Jonathan, and Babatha through a Bourdieusian Approach: Towards a New Historiographical Habitus
- Ancient Near Eastern Field Theory: Adapting Bourdieu for Social Biographies of the Ancient World
- Ahatabu and her Stela (ÄM 7707): Funerary Habitus in Achaemenid Egypt
- Functional Differentiation in 1 Maccabees: Exploring Second Century BCE Judean Society Through the Character of Jonathan Apphus
- Falling Out with the In-Laws. Understanding the Babatha Archive with Pierre Bourdieu’s Field Theory and Theory of Practice.
- Ancient Individuals and Bourdieu in Context: A Historical Anthropological Response
- A Sociological Response: Challenging the Modernity-centrism of Pierre Bourdieu’s Field Approach
- A Levantine Archaeological Response: Thinking with Bourdieu though Limited Data and Explicit Assumptions
