Pseudogapping in English: a direct interpretation approach

References

Abeillé, Anne, Gabriela Bîlbîie & François Mouret. 2014. A Romance perspective on gapping constructions. In Hans Boas & Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds.), Romance perspectives on construction grammar, 227–267. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cal.15.07abeSearch in Google Scholar

Aelbrecht, Lobke & William Harwood. 2015. To be or not to be elided: VP ellipsis revisited. Lingua 153. 66–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.10.006.Search in Google Scholar

Agbayani, Brian & Ed Zoerner. 2004. Gapping, pseudogappingand sideward movement. Studia Linguistica 58(3). 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0039-3193.2004.00114.x.Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan. 1982. The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chaves, Rui P. 2009. A linearization-based approach to gapping. In James Rogers (ed.), Proceedings of FG-MoL 2005: The 10th conference on formal grammar and the 9th meeting on mathematics of language Edinburgh, 205–218. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2017. VP-ellipsis. In Martin Everaert & Henk Van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn. 1–35. New York, United States: John Wiley & Sons Inc.10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom049Search in Google Scholar

Dalrymple, Mary, Stuart Shieber & Fernando Pereira. 1991. Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy 14(4). 399–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00630923.Search in Google Scholar

Gengel, Kristen. 2013. Pseudogapping and ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665303.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan & Ivan A. Sag. 2000. Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning and use of English interrogatives (CSLI Lecture Notes 123). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan & Philip Miller. 2018. Ellipsis in head-driven phrase structure grammar. In Jeroen van Creanenbroeck & Tanja Temmerman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis, 75–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198712398.013.4Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2005. Constructions at work: Constructionist approaches in context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2013. Constructionist approaches. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 15–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0002Search in Google Scholar

Griffiths, James & Anikó Lipták. 2014. Contrast and island sensitivity in clausal ellipsis. Syntax 17(3). 189–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12018.Search in Google Scholar

Hardt, Daniel. 1993. Verb phrase ellipsis: Form, meaning, and processing. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Hardt, Daniel & Maribel Romero. 2004. Ellipsis and the structure of discourse. Journal of Semantics 21(4). 375–414. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/21.4.375.Search in Google Scholar

Hartman, Jeremy. 2011. The semantic uniformity of traces: Evidence from ellipsis parallelism. Linguistic Inquiry 42. 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00050.Search in Google Scholar

Hoeksema, Jack. 2006. Pseudogapping: Its syntactic analysis and cumulative effects on its acceptability. Research on Language and Computation 4. 335–352.10.1007/s11168-006-9023-xSearch in Google Scholar

Jacobson, Pauline. 2016. The short answer: Implications for direct compositionality (and vice versa). Language 92(2). 331–375. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0038.Search in Google Scholar

Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil Achutha. 1990. Incomplete VP deletion and gapping. Linguistic Analysis 20. 64–81.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Kyle. 2001. What VP ellipsis can do, and what it can’t, but not why. In Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, 439–479. Oxford, UK; Malden Massachusetts, US: Blackwell Publishers.10.1002/9780470756416.ch14Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Kyle. 2009. Gapping is not (vp)-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 40. 289–328. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.289.Search in Google Scholar

Kehler, Andrew. 2000. Coherence and the resolution of ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 23(6). 533–575. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005677819813.10.1023/A:1005677819813Search in Google Scholar

Kempson, Ruth, Wilfried Meyer-Viol & Dov Gabbay. 1999. Vp ellipsis: Toward a dynamic, structural account. In Shalom Lappin & Elabbas Benmamoun (eds.), Fragments: Studies in ellipsis and gapping, 227–289. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195123029.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Kertz, Laura. 2013. Verb phrase ellipsis: The view from information structure. Language 89. 390–428. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0051.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Christina S., Gregory M. Kobele, Jeffrey T. Runner & John T. Hale. 2011. The acceptability cline in VP ellipsis. Syntax 14(4). 318–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00160.x.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Jong-Bok. 2006. Similarities and differences between English VP ellipsis and VP fronting: An HPSG analysis. Studies in Generative Grammar 13(3). 429–460.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Jong-Bok & Anne Abeillé. 2019. Why-stripping in English. Linguistic Research 36. 365–387. https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.36.3.201912.002.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Jong-Bok & Ivan A. Sag. 2002. Negation without head-movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(2). 339–412. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015045225019.10.1023/A:1015045225019Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Jong-Bok & Joanna Nykiel. 2020. The syntax and semantics of elliptical constructions: A direct interpretation perspective. Linguistic Research 39. 223–255.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Jong-Bok & Laura A. Michaelis. 2020. Syntactic constructions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Jong-Bok & Mark Davies. 2020. English what with absolute constructions: A construction grammar perspective. English Language and Linguistics 24(4). 637–666. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674319000169.Search in Google Scholar

Kubota, Yusuke & Robert Levine. 2017. Pseudogapping as pseudo-VP ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 48(2). 213–257. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00242.Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard. 1999. Pseudogapping puzzles. In Shalom Lappin & Elabbas Benmamoun (eds.), Fragments: Studies in ellipsis and gapping, 141–174. New York: Oxford University Press.10.4324/9780203987209-7Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Nancy S. 1979. Main verb ellipsis in spoken English. Columbus, Ohio, US: Ohio State University Doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195091816.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

López, Luis. 2000. Ellipsis and discourse-linking. Lingua 110(3). 183–213.10.1016/S0024-3841(99)00036-4Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2008. An asymmetry in voice mismatches in vp-ellipsis and pseudogapping. Linguistic Inquiry 39. 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.169.Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2013. Voice and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 44(1). 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00120.Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2016. Ellipsis: A survey of analytical approaches. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck & Tanja Temmerman (eds.), A handbook of ellipsis, 18–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198712398.013.2Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Philip. 1990. Pseudogapping and do so substitution. In Michael Ziolkowski, Manuela Noske & Karen Deaton (eds.), Papers from the 26th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 293–305. Chicago, Illinois, US: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Philip. 2014. A corpus study of pseudogapping and its theoretical consequences. In Christopher Pinon (ed.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics, vol. 10, 73–90. Paris: CSSP.Search in Google Scholar

Nykiel, Joanna & Kim Jong-Bok. 2021. Ellipsis. In Stefan Müller, Anne Abeillé, Robert D. Borsley & Jean-Pierre Koenig (eds.), Handbook of head-driven phrase structure grammar, 847–888. Berlin: Language Science.Search in Google Scholar

Park, Sang-Hee. 2019. Gapping: A constraint-based syntax-semantics interface. Buffalo, New York, US: State University of New York at Buffalo Doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Poppels, Till & Andrew Kehler. 2019. Reconsidering asymmetries in voice-mismatched VP- ellipsis. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1). 60. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.738.Search in Google Scholar

Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1(1). 75–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02342617.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Ruppenhofer, Josef & Laura A. Michaelis. 2014. Frames and the interpretation of omitted arguments in English. In Katz B. Stacey & Lindsy L. Myers (eds.), Perspectives on linguistic structure and context: Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht, 57–86. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/pbns.244.04rupSearch in Google Scholar

Sag, Ivan A. 1976. Deletion and logical form (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics). New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Sag, Ivan A. 2010. English filler-gap constructions. Language 86(3). 486–545. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0002.Search in Google Scholar

Sag, Ivan A. 2012. Sign-based construction grammar: An informal synopsis. In Hans C. Boas & Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Sign-based construction grammar, 69–202. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Sag, Ivan A., Thomas Wasow & Emily Bender. 2003. Syntactic theory: A formal introduction. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Stockwell, Richard. 2018. Ellipsis in tautologous conditionals: The contrast condition on ellipsis. Proceedings of Salt 28. 584–603.10.3765/salt.v28i0.4426Search in Google Scholar

Thoms, Gary. 2016. Pseudogapping, parallelism, and the scope of focus. Syntax 19(3). 286–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12122.Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2007. The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics 18(4). 523–557. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog.2007.027.Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. De Gruyter.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001Search in Google Scholar