The adjunct condition and the nature of adjuncts

References

Abusch, Dorit. 1998. Sequences of tense, intensionality, and scope. In Hagit Borer (ed.), Proceedings of the 7th West Coast Conference on formal linguistics, 1–14. Stanford, CA: CLSI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Baier, Nico. 2018. Spell-out, chains, and long-distance Wh-movement in Sereer. Berkeley Papers in Formal Linguistics 1. 1–44.10.5070/BF211038968Search in Google Scholar

Beerman, Dorothee, David LeBlanc & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.). 1997. Rightward movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.17Search in Google Scholar

Biskup, Petr & Radek Šimík. 2018. Extraction from clausal adjuncts in Czech. In Paper presented at formal approaches of slavic linguistics 27, Stanford University, 4–6 May 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, Cedric. 2003. Islands and chains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.63Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, Cedric. 2008. Bare syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, Cedric. 2012. Syntactic islands. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139022415Search in Google Scholar

Borgonovo, Claudia & Ad Neeleman. 2000. Transparent adjuncts. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 45. 199–224.10.1017/S0008413100017680Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2014. Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase. Linguistic Inquiry 45. 27–89.10.1162/LING_a_00148Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko & Jairo Nunes. 2007. The copy theory of movement. In Norbert Corver & Jairo Nunes (eds.), Copy theory of movement, 13–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.107.03bosSearch in Google Scholar

Brody, Michael. 1995. Lexico-logical form, a radically minimalist theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Jessica. 2017. Heads and adjuncts. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Doctoral thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Bruening, Benjamin. 2018. CPs move rightward, not leftward. Syntax 21. 362–401.10.1111/synt.12164Search in Google Scholar

Cable, Seth. 2004. Restructuring in English. Cambridge, MA: MS, MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Cattell, Ray. 1976. Constraints on movement rules. Language 52. 18–50.10.2307/413206Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Lisa. 2009. Wh-in-situ, from the 1980s to now. Language and Linguistic Compass 3. 767–791.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00133.xSearch in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar. In Stanley Peters (ed.), Goals of linguistic theory, 171–188. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond, 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra, William Ladusaw & James McCloskey. 1995. Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics 3. 239–282.10.1007/BF01248819Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A’-Dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Condoravdi, Cleo. 2001. Temporal interpretation of modals: Modals for the present and for the past. In David Beaver (eds.), Stanford papers on semantics, 59–88. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Dal Farra, Chiara. 2020. To be an or not to be an island. Venice: Università Ca’Foscari Venezia dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, Charron, Vina Smith, Super Nancy, Super PeterSr, Thom Charlie & Mikkelsen Line. 2020. Forms and functions of backward resumption: The case of Karuk. Language 96. 841–873.10.1353/lan.2020.0064Search in Google Scholar

Demonte, Violeta. 1988. Remarks on secondary predicates: C-command, extraction, and reanalysis. Linguistic Review 6. 1–39.10.1515/tlir.1987.6.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Den Dikken, Marcel. 2018. Dependency and directionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316822821Search in Google Scholar

DeVos, Mark. 2005. The syntax of verbal pseudo-coordination in English and Afrikaans. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Duffield, Nigel. 1999. Adjectival modifiers and the specifier-adjunct distinction. In David Adger, Susan Pintzuk, Bernadette Plunkett & George Tsoulas (eds.), Specifiers: Minimalist approaches, 126–145. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198238133.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

É Kiss, Katalin. 2009. Syntactic, semantic, and prosodic factors determining the position of adverbial adjuncts. In Katalin É Kiss (ed.), Adverbs and adverbial adjuncts at the interfaces, 1–28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214802.1.21Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, Thomas. 1991. A phrase structure for tertiaries. In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Perspectives on phrase structure: Heads and licensing (Syntax and Semantics, vol. 25), 189–208. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004373198_010Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, Thomas. 2007. On the role of semantics in a theory of adverb syntax. Lingua 117. 1008–1033.10.1016/j.lingua.2005.03.015Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, Thomas. 2014. The syntax of adverbs. In Andrew Carnie, Yosuke Sato & Daniel Sadiqqi (eds.), Routledge handbook of syntax, 106–130. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9781315796604.ch6Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, Thomas. 2020. The syntax of adverbials. Annual Review of Linguistics 6. 89–109.10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030334Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, Thomas. To appear. Semantic principles of adverbial distribution. In Dennis Ott & Ángel Gallego (eds.), Cartography and explanatory adequacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, Thomas & Timothy Grinsell. 2018. The semantic of domain adverbs. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Unpublished MS.Search in Google Scholar

Faraci, Robert. 1974. Aspects of the grammar of infinitives and for-phrases. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Felser, Christiane. 2004. Wh-copying, phases, and successive cyclicity. Lingua 114. 543–574.10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00054-8Search in Google Scholar

Fábregas, Antonia & Ángel Jiménez-Fernández. 2016. Extraction from gerunds and the internal syntax of verbs. Linguistics 54. 1308–1354.10.1515/ling-2016-0029Search in Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry. 1970. Three reasons for not deriving ‘kill’ from ‘case to die’. Linguistic Inquiry 1. 429–438.Search in Google Scholar

Fox, Danny. 2002. Antecedent-contained deletion and the copy theory of movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33. 63–96.10.1162/002438902317382189Search in Google Scholar

Fox, Danny & Howard Lasnik. 2003. Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34. 143–154.10.1162/002438903763255959Search in Google Scholar

Groat, Erich & John O’Neil. 1996. Spell-out at the LF interface. In Werner Abraham, Samuel David Epstein, Höskuldur Thráinsson & Jan-Wouter Zwart (eds.), Minimal ideas, 113–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.12.07groSearch in Google Scholar

Heim, Irena & Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Higginbotham, James. 1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16. 547–593.Search in Google Scholar

Higginbotham, James. 2000. On events in linguistic semantics. In Higginbotham James, Fabio Pianesi & Achille C. Varzi (eds.), Speaking of events, 49–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239313.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Hofmeister, Philip & Ivan Sag. 2010. Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language 86. 366–415.10.1353/lan.0.0223Search in Google Scholar

Hofmeister, Philip, Laure Staum Casasanto & Ivan Sag. 2012. How do individual cognitive differences relate to acceptability judgments? A reply to Sprouse, Wagers, and Phillips. Language 88. 390–400.10.1353/lan.2012.0025Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Hunter, Timothy. 2015. Deconstructing merge and move to make room for adjunction. Syntax 18. 266–319.10.1111/synt.12033Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Charles. 1991. Purpose clauses: Syntax, thematics, and semantics of English purpose constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-3478-1Search in Google Scholar

Kauffman, Daniel. 2006. Rigidity versus relativity in adverbial syntax. In Hans-Martin Gärtner, Paul Law & Joachim Sabel (eds.), Clause structure and adjuncts in Austronesian languages, 151–194. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.21248/zaspil.34.2004.209Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 1994. Antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kush, Dave, Terje Lohndal & Jon Sprouse. 2018. Investigating variation in island effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36. 743–779.10.1007/s11049-017-9390-zSearch in Google Scholar

Kush, Dave, Terje Lohndal & Jon Sprouse. 2019. On the island sensitivity of topicalization in Norwegian: An experimental investigation. Language 95. 393–420.10.1353/lan.2019.0051Search in Google Scholar

Landau, Idan. 2004. The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22. 811–877.10.1007/s11049-004-4265-5Search in Google Scholar

Landau, Idan. 2006. Chain resolution in Hebrew V(P) fronting. Syntax 9. 32–66.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2006.00084.xSearch in Google Scholar

Londahl, Terje. 2011. Phrase structure and argument structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Manzini, Rita. 1992. Locality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

McCloskey, James. 2006. Resumption. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, 94–117. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch55Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2001. Syntax of silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199243730.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2008. Variable island repair under ellipsis. In Kyle Johnson (ed.), Topics in ellipsis, 132–153. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487033.006Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Christiane. 2019. Permeable islands. Lund: Ph.D. dissertation, University of Lund.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Gereon. 2011. Constraints on displacement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.7Search in Google Scholar

Narita, Hiroki. 2012. Phase cycles in service of projection-free syntax. In Ángel Gallego (ed.), Phases, 125–173. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110264104.125Search in Google Scholar

Neeleman, Ad & Amanda Payne. 2020. PP-extraposition and the order of adverbials in English. Linguistic Inquiry 51. 471–520.10.1162/ling_a_00352Search in Google Scholar

Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4241.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Nunes, Jairo & Juan Uriagereka. 2000. Cyclicity and extraction domains. Syntax 3. 20–43.10.1111/1467-9612.00023Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 2000. Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5365.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Rackowski, Andrea & Marc Richards. 2005. Phase edge and extraction: A Tagalog case study. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 565–599.10.1162/002438905774464368Search in Google Scholar

Ramchand, Gillian. 2018. Situations and syntactic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/10911.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2015. Cartography, criteria, and labeling. In Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann & Simona Matteini (eds.), Structures, strategies, and beyond, 17–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0017Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variable in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Sabel, Joachim. 2002. A minimalist analysis of syntactic islands. The Linguistic Review 19. 271–315.10.1515/tlir.2002.002Search in Google Scholar

Safir, Ken. 1999. Vehicle change and reconstruction in Aʹ chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 587–620.10.1162/002438999554228Search in Google Scholar

Sheehan, Michelle. 2013. The resuscitation of CED. In Seda Kan, Claire Moore-Cantwell & Robert Staubs (eds.), NELS 40, 135–150. Amherst, MA: GLSA.10.36576/summa.32433Search in Google Scholar

Sichel, Ivy. 2014. Resumptive pronouns and competition. Linguistic Inquiry 45. 655–693.10.1162/LING_a_00169Search in Google Scholar

Sportiche, Dominique. 2016. Neglect. Los Angeles: UCLA Unpublished MS.Search in Google Scholar

Sportiche, Dominique. 2019. Somber prospects for late merger. Linguistic Inquiry 50. 416–424.10.1162/ling_a_00306Search in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Jon, Matt Wagers & Colin Phillips. 2012. A test of the relation between working-memory capacity and syntactic island effects. Language 88. 882–123.10.1353/lan.2012.0004Search in Google Scholar

von Stechow, Arnim. 2012. Tenses in compositional semantics. In Wolfgang Klein & Ping Li (eds.), Expression of time, 129–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199031.129Search in Google Scholar

Stepanov, Artur. 2007. The end of the CED? Minimalism and extraction domains. Syntax 10. 80–126.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2007.00094.xSearch in Google Scholar

Teleman, Ulf, Staffan Hellberg & Erik Andersson. 1999. Svenska Akademiens Grammatik [Swedish reference grammar], vol. 4. Stockholm: Svenska akademien.Search in Google Scholar

Truswell, Robert. 2007. Extraction from adjuncts and the structure of events. Lingua 117. 1355–1377.10.1016/j.lingua.2006.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Truswell, Robert. 2011. Events, phrases, and questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577774.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Multiple spell-out. In Samuel David Epstein & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Working minimalism, 251–282. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7305.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

Uriagereka, Juan. 2012. Spell-out and the minimalist program. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593521.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Van Urk, Coppe. 2018. Pronoun copying in Dinka Bor and the copy theory of movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36. 937–990.10.1007/s11049-017-9384-xSearch in Google Scholar

Webelhuth, Gert, Manfred Ailer & Heike Walker (eds.). 2013a. Rightward movement in a comparative perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.200Search in Google Scholar

Webelhuth, Gert, Manfred Ailer & Heike Walker. 2013b. Introduction. In Gert Webelhuth, Manfred Ailer & Heike Walker (eds.), Rightward movement in a comparative perspective, 1–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.200Search in Google Scholar

Wiklund, Anna-Lena. 2007. The syntax of tenselessness. Berlin: Mouton de Guyter.10.1515/9783110197839Search in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, Susi. 2014. Tense and aspect in English infinitives. Linguistic Inquiry 45. 403–447.10.1162/LING_a_00161Search in Google Scholar