CP-recursion in Danish: A cP/CP-analysis

References

Allwood, J. 1976. The complex NP constraint as a non-universal rule and some semantic factors influencing the acceptability of Swedish sentences which violate the CNPC. In J. Stillings (ed.), University of Massachusetts occasional papers in Linguistics II, Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.Search in Google Scholar

Allwood, J. 1982. The complex NP constraints in Swedish. In E. Engdahl & E. Ejerhed (eds.), Readings on unbounded dependencies in Scandinavian languages, Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell International.Search in Google Scholar

Andersson, L.-G. 1975. Form and function of subordinate clauses. University of Gothenburg Ph.D. dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Antomo, M & M. Steinbach. 2010. Desintegration und Interpretation: “Weil”-V2-Sätze an der Schnittstelle zwischen Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29. 1–37.10.1515/zfsw.2010.001Search in Google Scholar

Bentzen, K., G. H. Hrafnbjargarson, Þ. Hróarsdóttir & A.-L. Wiklund. 2007. Extracting from V2. Working papers in Scandinavian syntax 79. 119–128.Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. 2012. Syntactic Islands. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139022415Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. & K. K. Grohmann. 2007. Remark: Putting phases in perspective. Syntax 10(2). 204–222.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2007.00098.xSearch in Google Scholar

Brandtler, J. 2008. On the structure of Swedish subordinate clauses. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 81. 79–97.Search in Google Scholar

Brandtler, J. 2010. The evaluability hypothesis: The syntax and semantics of polarity item licensing in Swedish, Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap, serie A, Lunds universitet Ph.D.-dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Branigan, P. 1996. Verb-second and the A-bar syntax of subjects. Studia Linguistica 50. 50–79.10.1111/j.1467-9582.1996.tb00343.xSearch in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle, 232–286. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1977. On Wh-movement. In P. Culicover, T. Wasow & A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 6. Cambrige, MA: MIT PressSearch in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken hale: A life in language, 1–50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1). 1–22.10.1162/0024389052993655Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2006. Approaching UG from below. Ms, MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. & H. Lasnik. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In J. Jacobs (ed.), Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, vol. 1, 506–569. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110095869.1.9.506Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, K. R., J. Kizach & A. M. Nyvad. 2013b. The processing of syntactic islands – an fMRI study. Journal of Neurolinguistics 26(2). 239–251.10.1016/j.jneuroling.2012.08.002Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, K. R., J. Kizach & A. M. Nyvad. 2012. Erratum to: Escape from the Island: Grammaticality and (Reduced) acceptability of Wh-island violations in Danish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 41(6). 487–487. doi:10.1007/s10936-012-9225-3.Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, K. R., J. Kizach & A. M. Nyvad. 2013a. Escape from the island: Grammaticality and (reduced) acceptability of wh-island violations in Danish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 42(1). 51–70.10.1007/s10936-012-9210-xSearch in Google Scholar

Christensen, K. R. & A. M. Nyvad. 2014. On the nature of escapable relative islands. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 37(1). 29–45.10.1017/S0332586514000055Search in Google Scholar

Chung, S. & J. McCloskey. 1987. Government, barriers and small clauses in modern Irish. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 173–237.Search in Google Scholar

Crain, S. & R. Thornton. 1998. Investigations in Universal Grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, P. W. 1992. The adverb effect: Evidence against ECP accounts of the that-t effect. NELS 23(1). 97–111. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.Search in Google Scholar

de Cuba, C. 2007. On (non)factivity, clausal complementation and the CP-field. Stony Brook University PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

De Haan, G. & F. Weerman. 1985. Finiteness and verb fronting in Frisian. In H. Haider & M. Prinzhorn (eds.), Verb second phenomena in Germanic languages, 77–110. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Den Besten, H. 1977. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. Ms., University of Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

Diesing, M. 1990. Verb movement and the subject position in Yiddish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8(1). 41–79.10.1007/BF00205531Search in Google Scholar

Engdahl, E. 1982. Restrictions on unbounded dependencies in Swedish. In E. Engdahl & E. Ejerhed (eds.), Readings on unbounded dependencies in Scandinavian languages. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell International.Search in Google Scholar

Engdahl, E. 1985. Constituent questions. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-5323-9Search in Google Scholar

Engdahl, E. 1997. Relative clause extraction in context. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 60. 51–79.Search in Google Scholar

Engdahl, E. & E. Ejerhed. 1982. Readings on unbounded dependencies in Scandinavian languages, 151–174. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell International.Search in Google Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, N. 1973. On the nature of island constraints. MIT PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, N. 1982. Extractability in Danish and the pragmatic principle of dominance. In E. Engdahl & E. Ejerhed (eds.), Readings on unbounded dependencies in Scandinavian languages. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell International.Search in Google Scholar

Felser, C. 2004. Wh-copying, phases and successive-cyclicity. Lingua 114. 543–574.10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00054-8Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, E. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68. 1–76.10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, E. 2000. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Y. Miyashita, A. Marantz & W. O’Neil (eds.), Image, language, brain, 95–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, E. & T. Warren. 2004. Reading-time evidence for intermediate linguistic structure in long-distance dependencies. Syntax 7(1). 55–78.10.1111/j.1368-0005.2004.00065.xSearch in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, J. 1997. Projection, heads and optimality. Linguistic Inquiry 28. 373–422.Search in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, J. 2005. Words and structure. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, Aa. 1967. Moderne Dansk, vols. 1–3. Copenhagen: Grafisk Forlag.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, E. & L. Heltoft. 2011. Grammatik over det Danske Sprog, vols. 1–3. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, J. A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554285Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, J. A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Heinat, F. & A. Wiklund. 2015. Scandinavian relative clause extraction: Apparent restrictions. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 94. 36–50.Search in Google Scholar

Henry, A. 1995. Belfast English and standard English: Dialect variation and parameter setting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hoekstra, E. 1993. Dialectal variation inside CP as parametric variation. In W. Abraham & J. Bayer (eds.), Dialektsyntax, special issue 5 of linguistische berichte, 161–179. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.10.1007/978-3-322-97032-9_8Search in Google Scholar

Holmberg, A. 1986. Word order and syntactic features in the Scandinavian languages and English. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.Search in Google Scholar

Hooper, J. & S. Thompson. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4). 465–497.Search in Google Scholar

Hrafnbjargarson, G. H., K. Bentzen & A.-L. Wiklund. 2010. Observations on extraction from V2 clauses in Scandinavian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 3. 209–299.10.1017/S0332586510000223Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C. T. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. MIT Doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Iatridou, S. & A. Kroch. 1992. The licensing of CP-recursion and its relevance to the Germanic verb-second phenomenon. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 50. 1–24.Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, A. 1998. Knudekonstruktioner – en syntaktisk, semantisk og pragmatisk analyse af sætningsknuder i dansk. University of Copenhagen Unpublished MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, A. 2001. Sentence intertwining in Danish. In E. Engberg-Pedersen & P. Harder (eds.), Ikonicitet of struktur, 23–39. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, K. & S. Vikner. 1994. The position of the verb in Scandinavian infinitives. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 53. 61–84.Search in Google Scholar

Julien, M. 2007. Embedded V2 in Norwegian and Swedish. Working papers in Scandinavian Syntax 80, 103–161. Lund: Lund University.Search in Google Scholar

Kandybowicz, J. 2008. On edge features and perfect extraction. In C. B. Chang & H. J. Haynie (eds.), Proceedings of the 26^th West coast conference on formal linguistics, 288–296. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, R. & J. P. Pollock. 1978. Stylistic inversion, successive-cyclicity, and move NP in French. Linguistic Inquiry 9(4). 595–621.Search in Google Scholar

Koizumi, M. 1995. Phrase structure in minimalist syntax. MIT PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Korzen, H. 1977. Snak om sætningsknuder. Romansk Instituts Duplikerede Småskrifter 49. 3–63.Search in Google Scholar

Kristensen, L., E. Engberg-Pedersen & M. Poulsen. 2013. Context improves comprehension of fronted objects. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. Epub ahead of print. PMID 23504556.10.1007/s10936-013-9241-ySearch in Google Scholar

Kush, D. & F. Lindahl. 2011. On the escapability of islands in Scandinavian. Handout from a talk at 2011 LSA Meeting, Pittsburgh.Search in Google Scholar

Kush, D., A. Omaki & N. Hornstein. 2013. Micro-variation in Islands? In J. Sprouse & N. Hornstein (eds.), Experimental syntax and island effects, 239–265. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139035309.013Search in Google Scholar

Larson, R. K. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3). 335–391.10.4324/9780203429204-7Search in Google Scholar

Larson, R. K. 1990. Double objects revisited: Reply to Jackendoff. Linguistic Inquiry 21(4). 589–632.10.4324/9780203429204-8Search in Google Scholar

Legate, J. A. 2003. Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry 34(3). 506–516.10.1162/ling.2003.34.3.506Search in Google Scholar

Maling, J. & A. Zaenen. 1982. A phrase-structure account of Scandinavian extraction phenomena. In P. Jacobsen & G. Pullum (eds.), The nature of syntactic representation, 229–282. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-7707-5_7Search in Google Scholar

Marinis, T., L. Roberts, C. Felser & H. Clahsen. 2005. Gaps in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27. 53–78.10.1017/S0272263105050035Search in Google Scholar

McCloskey, J. 2006. Questions and questioning in a local English. In R. Zanuttini, H. Campos, E. Herburger & P. Portner (eds.), Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics: Negation, tense, and clausal architecture, 87–126. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mikkelsen, K. 1911. Dansk Ordföjningslære. Copenhagen: Lehmann & Stage. Reprinted 1975.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, G. & W. Sternefeld. 1993. Improper movement and unambiguous binding. Linguistic Inquiry 24(3). 461–507.Search in Google Scholar

Newmeyer, F. J. 2005. Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistics typology. New York: Oxford University Press,10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274338.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Nyvad, A. M. 2016. Multiple complementizers in modern Danish and Middle English. In S. Vikner, H. Jørgensen & E. V. Gelderen (eds.), Let us have articles betwixt us. Papers in Historical and Comparative Linguistics in Honour of Johanna L. Wood, 361–378. Aarhus: Dept. of English, School of Communication & Culture, Aarhus University.Search in Google Scholar

Nyvad, A. M., K. R. Christensen & S. Vikner. 2014. The left periphery and agrammatism: Wh-extractions in Danish. In E. O. Aboh, M. T. Guasti & I. Roberts (eds.), Locality, 254–273. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945269.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, C. 2013. Some arguments and non-arguments for reductionist accounts of syntactic phenomena. Language and Cognitive Processes 28. 156–187.10.1080/01690965.2010.530960Search in Google Scholar

Poole, G. 2011. Syntactic theory, 2nd edn. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1007/978-0-230-34531-7Search in Google Scholar

Poulsen, M. 2005. Sentence processing and grammatical in functional linguistics: extraction in Danish as an example. Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Poulsen, M. 2008. Acceptability and processing of long-distance dependencies in Danish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 31(1). 73–107.10.1017/S0332586508001832Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, T. 1981. A second COMP position. In A. Belletti, L. Brandi & L. Rizzi (eds.), The theory of markedness in generative Grammar, 518–557. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. & I. Roberts. 1989. Complex inversion in French. Probus 1/1. 1–30. Reprinted in A. Belletti & L. Rizzi (eds.). 1996. Parameters and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 91–116.10.4324/9781315310572-9Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, I. 1993. Verbs and diachronic syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, J. R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. MIT Doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Sabel, J. 2002. A minimalist analysis of syntactic islands. The Linguistic Review 19. 271–315.10.1515/tlir.2002.002Search in Google Scholar

Sprouse, J. 2007. Continuous acceptability, categorical grammaticality, and experimental syntax. Biolinguistics 1. 118–129.10.5964/bioling.8597Search in Google Scholar

Stowell, T. 1981. Origins of phrase structure. MIT Doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Szabolcsi, A. 2006. Strong and weak islands. In M. Everaert, H. Van Riemsdijk, R. Goedemans & B. Hollebrandse (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, 479–532. London: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch64Search in Google Scholar

Taraldsen, K. T. 1981. On the theoretical interpretation of a class of “Marked” extractions. In A. Belletti, L. Brandi & L. Rizzi (eds.), The theory of markedness in generative grammar, 475–516. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.Search in Google Scholar

Thráinsson, H. 1985. V1, V2, V3 in Icelandic. In H. Haider & M. Prinzhorn (eds.), Verb second phenomena in Germanic languages, 169–194. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Torrego, E. 1984. On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 103–130.Search in Google Scholar

Truswell, R. 2007a. Extraction from adjuncts and the structure of events. Lingua 117. 1355–1377.10.1016/j.lingua.2006.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Truswell, R. 2007b. Tense, events, and extraction from adjuncts. Ms, University College London.Search in Google Scholar

Uriagereka, J. 1999. Multiple spell-out. In S. D. Epstein & N. Hornstein (eds.), Working minimalism, 251–282. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Van Valin, R. D. & R. D. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166799Search in Google Scholar

Vandergriff, I. 2005. “weil der schmeckt so gut!” The Learner as Linguist. Die Unterrichtspraxis /Teaching German 38(1). 61–73.10.1111/j.1756-1221.2005.tb00042.xSearch in Google Scholar

Vikner, S. 1991. Relative der and Other C°-Elements in Danish. Lingua 84(2–3). 109–136.10.1016/0024-3841(91)90067-FSearch in Google Scholar

Vikner, S. 1995. Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Vikner, S. & B. Schwartz. 1996. The verb always leaves IP in V2 clauses. In A. Belletti & L. Rizzi (eds.), Parameters and functional heads, 11–62. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Watanabe, A. 1993. Agr-based case theory and its interaction with the A-bar system. MIT PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Wiklund, A.-L., K. Bentzen, G. H. Hrafnbjargarson & Þ. Hróarsdóttir. 2009. On the distribution and illocution of V2 in Scandinavian that-clauses. Lingua 119(12). 1914–1938.10.1016/j.lingua.2009.03.006Search in Google Scholar