Home Growth, interface structure, and magnetic properties of Fe/GaAs and Fe3Si/GaAs hybrid systems
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Growth, interface structure, and magnetic properties of Fe/GaAs and Fe3Si/GaAs hybrid systems

  • Jens Herfort EMAIL logo , Achim Trampert and Klaus H. Ploog
Published/Copyright: February 12, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Ferromagnetic Fe and Fe3Si films are grown on GaAs(001) substrates by molecular beam epitaxy. This review article summarizes the important aspects of the heteroepitaxial growth and the associated structural properties of the Fe/GaAs and Fe3Si/GaAs heterostructures. The magnetic anisotropy of the thin Fe epilayers is analyzed and correlated to the interface structure, which is determined by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. The structural and electrical properties of Fe3Si alloys depend on the exact stoichiometry and the long-range atomic ordering that is controlled by the growth conditions during the molecular beam epitaxy. The interface reactivity and the thermal stability are critically discussed for both heterosystems.


Dedicated to Professor Dr. Knut Urban on the occasion of his 65th birthday



Dr. Jens Herfort Paul-Drude-Institut für Festkörperelektronik Hausvogteiplatz 5–7, 10117 Berlin, Germany Tel.: +49 30 20377 344 Fax: +49 30 20377 515

Funding statement: The authors thank B. Jenichen, V. M. Kaganer, and H.-P. Schönherr for their active contributions to the work reported here and H. v. Kiedrowski for the TEM sample preparation. The partial support by the German Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung under contracts 13N8255 and 01BM907 is gratefully acknowledged

References

[1] G.A. Prince: Science 282 (1998) 1660.10.1126/science.282.5394.1660Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] S.A. Wolf, D.D. Awschalom, R.A. Buhrmann, J.M. Doughton, S. von Molnar, M.L. Roukes, A.Y. Chtelkanova, D.M. Treger: Science 294 (2001) 1488.10.1126/science.1065389Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] H. Ohno: Science 281 (1998) 951.10.1126/science.281.5379.951Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] R. Fieldering, M. Keim, G. Reuscher, W. Ossau, G. Schmidt, A. Waag, L.W. Molenkamp: Nature 402 (1999) 787.10.1038/45502Search in Google Scholar

[5] Y. Ohno, D.K. Young, B. Beschoten, F. Matsukura, H. Ohno, D.D. Awschalon: Nature 402 (1999) 790.10.1038/45509Search in Google Scholar

[6] B.T. Jonker, Y.D. Park, B.R. Bennett, H.D. Cheong, G. Kioseoglou, A. Petrou: Phys. Rev. B 62 (2000) 8180.10.1103/PhysRevB.62.8180Search in Google Scholar

[7] E.I. Rashba: Phys. Rev. B 62 (2000) R16267.10.1103/PhysRevB.62.R16267Search in Google Scholar

[8] H.J. Zhu, M. Ramsteiner, H. Kostial, M. Wassermeier, H.-P. Schönherr, K.H. Ploog: Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 016601.10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.016601Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] M. Ramsteiner, H.Y. Hao, A. Kawaharazuka, H.J. Zhu, M. Kästner, R. Hey, L. Däweritz, H.T. Grahn, K.H. Ploog: Phys. Rev. B 66 (2002) 081304(R).10.1103/PhysRevB.66.081304Search in Google Scholar

[10] A. Kawaharazuka, M. Ramsteiner, J. Herfort, H.-P. Schönherr, H. Kostial, K.H. Ploog: Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 (2004) 3492.10.1063/1.1807014Search in Google Scholar

[11] A.T. Hanbicki, B.T. Jonker, G. Itskos, G. Kioseglou, A. Petrou: Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 (2002) 1240.10.1063/1.1449530Search in Google Scholar

[12] V.F. Motsnyi, J. de Boeck, J. Das, W. van Roy, G. Borghs, E. Goovaerts, V.I. Safarov: Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 (2002) 265.10.1063/1.1491010Search in Google Scholar

[13] G.A. Prinz, J.J. Krebs: Appl. Phys. Lett. 39 (1981) 397.10.1063/1.92750Search in Google Scholar

[14] J.R. Waltrop, R.W. Grant: Appl. Phys. Lett. 34 (1979) 630.10.1063/1.90642Search in Google Scholar

[15] E.M. Kneedler, B.T. Jonker, P.M. Thibado, R.J.Wagner, B.V. Shanabrook, L.J. Whitman: Phys. Rev. B 56 (1997) 8163.10.1103/PhysRevB.56.8163Search in Google Scholar

[16] Y.B. Xu, E.T.M. Kernohan, D.J. Freeland, A. Ercole, M. Tselepi, J.A.C. Bland: Phys. Rev. B 58 (1998) 890.10.1103/PhysRevB.58.890Search in Google Scholar

[17] M. Zölfl, M. Brockmann, M. Köhler, S. Kreutzer, T. Schweinböck, S. Miethaner, F. Bensch, G. Bayreuther: J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 165 (1997) 16.10.1016/S0304-8853(97)00209-6Search in Google Scholar

[18] H.-P. Schönherr, R. Nötzel, W. Ma, K. H. Ploog: J. Appl. Phys. 89 (2001) 169.10.1063/1.1330556Search in Google Scholar

[19] J. Herfort, W. Braun, A. Trampert, H.-P. Schönherr, K.H. Ploog: Appl. Surf. Sci. 237 (2004) 181.10.1016/S0169-4332(04)01022-0Search in Google Scholar

[20] for a recent review see: G. Wastlbauer, J.A.C. Bland: Adv. Phys. 54 (2005) 137.10.1080/00018730500112000Search in Google Scholar

[21] S. Erwin, S.-H. Lee, M. Scheffler: Phys. Rev. B 65 (2002) 205422.10.1103/PhysRevB.65.205422Search in Google Scholar

[22] B. Lepine, S. Ababou, A. Guivarc’h, G. Jezequel, S. Depurtier, R. Guerin, A. Fillipe, A. Schuhl, F. Abel, C. Cohen, A. Rocher, J. Crestou: J. Appl. Phys. 83 (1998) 3077.10.1063/1.367063Search in Google Scholar

[23] R. Moosbühler, F. Bensch, M. Dumm, G. Bayreuther: J. Appl. Phys. 91 (2002) 8757.10.1063/1.1447205Search in Google Scholar

[24] J.W. Freeland, I. Coulthard, W.J. Antel, A.P.J. Stampfl: Phys. Rev. B 63 (2001) 193301.10.1103/PhysRevB.63.193301Search in Google Scholar

[25] O. Thomas, Q. Shen, P. Schieffer, N. Tournier, B. Lepine: Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 017205.10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.017205Search in Google Scholar

[26] J.J. Elmers, J. Hausschild, U. Gradmann: Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 15224.10.1103/PhysRevB.54.15224Search in Google Scholar

[27] W. Dürr, M. Taborelli, O. Paul, R. Germar, W. Gudat, D. Pescia, M. Landold: Phys. Rev. B 62 (1989) 206.10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.206Search in Google Scholar

[28] F. Bensch, G. Garreau, M. Dumm, G. Bayreuther, E. Beaurepaire: J. Appl. Phys. 89 (2001) 7133.10.1063/1.1361258Search in Google Scholar

[29] M. Brockmann, M. Zölfl, S. Miethaner, G. Bayreuther: J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 198/199 (1999) 384.10.1016/S0304-8853(98)01142-1Search in Google Scholar

[30] P.K. Muduli, J. Herfort, H.-P. Schönherr, K.H. Ploog: J. Appl. Phys. 97 (2005) 123904.10.1063/1.1929852Search in Google Scholar

[31] P.K. Muduli, J. Herfort, H.-P. Schönherr, L. Däweritz, K.H. Ploog: Appl. Phys. A 81 (2005) 901.10.1007/s00339-005-3312-3Search in Google Scholar

[32] F. Bensch F.R. Moosbühler, G. Bayreuther: J. Appl. Phys. 91, (2002) 8754.10.1063/1.1456391Search in Google Scholar

[33] Y. Nakamura: Landoldt-Börnstein, New Series III/19c, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1988, p. 26.Search in Google Scholar

[34] C. Palmstrom: MRS Bulletin 28 (2003) 725.10.1557/mrs2003.213Search in Google Scholar

[35] R.A. de Groot, F.M. Mueller, P.G. van Engen, K.H.J. Buschow: Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 2024.10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.2024Search in Google Scholar

[36] I. Galanakis, P.H. Dederichs, N. Papanikolaou: Phys. Rev. B 66 (2002) 174429.10.1103/PhysRevB.66.174429Search in Google Scholar

[37] D. Orgassa, H. Fujiwara, T.C. Schulthess, W.H. Buttler: Phys. Rev. B 60 (1999) 12237.10.1103/PhysRevB.60.13237Search in Google Scholar

[38] J. Herfort, H.-P. Schönherr, K.H. Ploog: Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 (2003) 3912.10.1063/1.1625426Search in Google Scholar

[39] J. Herfort, H.-P. Schönherr, K.-J. Friedland, K.H. Ploog: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 22 (2004) 2073.10.1116/1.1768528Search in Google Scholar

[40] P.K. Muduli, J. Herfort, H.-P. Schönherr, K.H. Ploog: J. Cryst. Growth 285 (2005) 514.10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.08.049Search in Google Scholar

[41] P.K. Muduli, K.-J. Friedland, J. Herfort, H.-P. Schönherr, K.H. Ploog: Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005) 104430.10.1103/PhysRevB.72.104430Search in Google Scholar

[42] W.A. Hines, A.H. Menotti, J.I. Budnick, T.J. Burch, T. Litrenta, V. Niculescu, K. Raj: Phys. Rev. B 13 (1976) 4060.10.1103/PhysRevB.13.4060Search in Google Scholar

[43] O. Kubaschewski: Iron – Binary Phase Diagrams, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1982, p. 137.Search in Google Scholar

[44] B. Jenichen, V.M. Kaganer, J. Herfort, D.K. Satapathy, H.-P. Schönherr, W. Braun, K. H. Ploog: Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005) 075329.10.1103/PhysRevB.72.075329Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2006-02-01
Accepted: 2006-04-07
Published Online: 2022-02-12

© 2006 Carl Hanser Verlag, München

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Professor Dr. Knut Urban 65 Years
  4. Basic
  5. Ordering processes and atomic defects in FeCo
  6. Atomic resolution electron tomography: a dream?
  7. Electron tomography of microelectronic device interconnects
  8. Aberration correction in electron microscopy
  9. Off-axis electron holography: Materials analysis at atomic resolution
  10. Determination of phases of complex scattering amplitudes and two-particle structure factors by investigating diffractograms of thin amorphous foils
  11. Prospects of the multislice method for CBED pattern calculation
  12. Electron energy-loss spectrometry for metals:some thoughts beyond microanalysis
  13. Quantitative assessment of nanoparticle size distributions from HRTEM images
  14. Quantitative microstructural and spectroscopic investigation of inversion domain boundaries in sintered zinc oxide ceramics doped with iron oxide
  15. Structural domains in antiferromagnetic LaFeO3 thin films
  16. Short-range order of liquid Ti72.3Fe27.7 investigated by a combination of neutron scattering and X-ray diffraction
  17. Extended interfacial structure between two asymmetrical facets of a Σ = 9 grain boundary in copper
  18. Dislocation imaging in fcc colloidal single crystals
  19. Applied
  20. Omega phase transformation – morphologies and mechanisms
  21. Mixed (Sr1 − xCax)33Bi24Al48O141 fullerenoids: the defect structure analysed by (S)TEM techniques
  22. Wetting of aluminium-based complex metallic alloys
  23. Annealing-induced phase transitions in a Zr–Ti–Nb–Cu–Ni–Al bulk metallic glass matrix composite containing quasicrystalline precipitates
  24. Special planar defects in the structural complex metallic alloys of Al–Pd–Mn and Al–Ni–Rh
  25. On the formation of Si nanowires by molecular beam epitaxy
  26. Self-induced oscillations in Si and other semiconductors
  27. Growth, interface structure, and magnetic properties of Fe/GaAs and Fe3Si/GaAs hybrid systems
  28. An investigation of improved titanium/titanium nitride barriers for submicron aluminum-filled contacts by energy-filtered transmission electron microscopy
  29. Radiation damage during HRTEM studies in pure Al and Al alloys
  30. Cross-sectional high-resolution transmission electron microscopy at Mo/Si multilayer stacks
  31. Structural properties of the fiber –matrix interface in carbon-fiber/carbon-matrix composites and interfaces between carbon layers and planar substrates
  32. Microstructure and properties of surface-treated Timetal 834
  33. Notifications
  34. Personal
  35. Conferences
Downloaded on 2.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijmr-2006-0161/pdf
Scroll to top button