Home Optimization of Storage Conditions of Malta (Citrus sinensis) Using Response Surface Methodology
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Optimization of Storage Conditions of Malta (Citrus sinensis) Using Response Surface Methodology

  • Rishi Richa EMAIL logo , J.P. Pandey , N.C. Shahi and S.S. Kautkar
Published/Copyright: April 26, 2016

Abstract

Response surface methodology was used to determine the optimum storage conditions of malta fruits that give minimum weight loss and maximum total soluble solid (TSS) retained value. Scavenger (3–5 g), polythene thickness (75–125 gauge) and fungicide concentration (75–200 ppm) were the factors investigated. Experiments were designed according to Box–Behnken design with these three factors, including central points. For each response, a second-order polynomial model was developed using multiple linear regression analysis. Applying desirability function method, optimum storage conditions were found to be 5 g scavenger, 125 gauge polythene thickness and 200 ppm fungicide concentration.

References

1. Snart JE, Arpaia ML, Harris LJ. Oranges: Safe Methods to store preserve and enjoy. University of California. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. ANR Publication 2006; 8199. http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu.10.3733/ucanr.8199Search in Google Scholar

2. Parle M, Orange CD. Range of benefit. Int Res J Pharm 2012;3(7):59–63.Search in Google Scholar

3. Dasmohapatra R, Nautiyal MC, Sharma SK. Effect of pedicel retention and zero energy cool chamber on storage behavior of malta fruits. Int J Agric Sci 2011;3(2):78–81.10.9735/0975-3710.3.2.78-81Search in Google Scholar

4. Floros JD, Dock LL, Han JH. Active packaging technologies and applications. Food Cosmetics and Drug Packaging X 1997;10.Search in Google Scholar

5. Koochek A, Taherian AR, Razavi SMA, Bostan A. Response surface methodology for optimization of extraction yield, viscosity, hue and emulsion stability of mucilage extracted from Lepidium perfoliatum seeds. Food Hydrocolloids 2009;23:2369–79.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.06.014Search in Google Scholar

6. Khuri AL, Cornell JA. Responses surfaces: design and analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1996:114–16.Search in Google Scholar

7. Rangnna S. Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruit and vegetables. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Pub. Co. Ltd., 2005:87.Search in Google Scholar

8. Trinh TK, Kang LS. Application of response surface method as an experimental design to optimize coagulation test. Environ Eng Res 2012;15(2):63–70.10.4491/eer.2010.15.2.063Search in Google Scholar

9. Lee J, Ye L, Landen WO, Eitenmiller RR. Optimization of an extraction procedure for the quantification of vitamin E in tomato and broccoli using response surface methodology. J Food Compos Anal 2000;13:45–57.10.1006/jfca.1999.0845Search in Google Scholar

10. Weng W, Liu W, Lin W. Studies on the optimum models of the dairy product Kou Woan Lao using response surface methodology. Asian–Australas J Anim Sci 2001;14:1470–6.10.5713/ajas.2001.1470Search in Google Scholar

11. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

12. Haber A, Runyun RP. General statistics, 3rd ed. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley, 1977.Search in Google Scholar

13. Hussain MA, Ahmed M, Khan M, Shakir I. Effect of uni-packaging on the post harvest behavior of citrus fruits in N.W.F.P. Pakistan J Nutr 2004;3(6):336–9.10.3923/pjn.2004.336.339Search in Google Scholar

14. Reddy VB, Madhavi GB, Reddy DV, Reddy VC, Srinu B. Effect of different packing materials on the shelf life and quality of acid lime (citrus aurantifolia swingla.) at room temperature. J Dairying Foods H.S 2008;27(3/4):216–20.Search in Google Scholar

15. Wills RHH, Lee TH, Graham D, Glasson WBMC, Hall EG. An introduction to the physiology and handling of fruits and vegetables. Granada Publishing Limited – Technical Books Division. Frogmore, St Albans, Herts AL2 2NF, 1981.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-4-26
Published in Print: 2016-7-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 12.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2015-0231/html
Scroll to top button