Abstract
This study presents a data-driven framework for controlling abnormal responses in multi-reactor nuclear power plants under cooperative operating conditions. By integrating multiple-source operational parameters – including thermal power, steam pressure, coolant flow rates, and structural pressure dynamics – the system effectively models and identifies transient safety risks, such as pressurised vessel damage, molten relocation, and steam leakage. A novel Asymmetric Multi-Classifier Learning (AMCL) approach is proposed to enhance classification accuracy in the presence of class imbalance and dynamic uncertainty. Experimental validation using internal iterative loss convergence curves, confusion matrices, and real plant incident recordings demonstrates the superiority of the proposed method over traditional STL, SMCL, and balanced-AMCL schemes. Furthermore, multi-scenario response graphs confirm the system’s adaptability across typical load disturbances and emergency conditions.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: QIAN WU: Methodology, Project Administration, Manuscript Editing, HONG CHEN: Software Development, Validation, JIE XIN: Visualization, Manuscript Review, and Editing, Design Framework, Resources, Validation, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Supervision, QIANG CUI: Writing – Original Draft, Conceptualization.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: Not applicable.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding this work.
-
Research funding: There is no specific funding to support this research.
-
Data availability: All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript.
References
1. Kumar, P, Samui, P. Reliability-based load and resistance factor design of an energy pile with CPT data using machine learning techniques. Arabian J Sci Eng 2024;49:4831–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08253-2.Search in Google Scholar
2. Sui, Y, Wang, Y, Yu, X. Nonlinear dynamic analysis of soil-pile interactions of nuclear power plants with nonlithological foundation. Eng Comput 2023;40:1454–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/ec-12-2021-0747.Search in Google Scholar
3. Xinyu, LU, Liping, JING, Wenhao, QI, Feng, XIA. Shaking table tests on seismic dynamic response of pile groups under nuclear structures. Chin J Geotech Eng 2023;45:91–7.Search in Google Scholar
4. Firoj, M, Maheshwari, BK. Dynamic impedances of CPRF using coupled BEM-FEM approach: a parametric study and application. Eng Anal Bound Elem 2023;156:8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2023.07.036.Search in Google Scholar
5. Li, F, Mihara, T, Udagawa, Y. A study on the fracture pattern change of high-burnup fuel cladding that failed due to pellet-cladding mechanical interaction failure under reactivity-initiated accident conditions. J Nucl Sci Technol 2024:1–11.10.1080/00223131.2024.2313553Search in Google Scholar
6. Varghese, R, Nigesh, SV, Banerjee, S, Boominathan, A. The horizontal mode natural frequency of a floating pile in layered soil: full-scale field test vs. Mathematical models. Indian Geotech J 2023;53:717–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-023-00713-8.Search in Google Scholar
7. Makhin, VM, Podshibyakin, AK. Cliff-edge effects’ in safety justification and operation of NPP units. Nucl Eng Technol 2023;9:33–42. https://doi.org/10.3897/nucet.9.100755.Search in Google Scholar
8. Subhan, M, Soemardi, TP, Setiadipura, T, Sulistyo, FY, Subiyah, H. The study of multiaxial loading and damage to the structure and materials in the PWR steam generator of nuclear reactor. Jurnal Teknologi Reaktor Nuklir Tri Dasa Mega 2023;25:125–32. https://doi.org/10.55981/tdm.2023.6963.Search in Google Scholar
9. Batyrbekov, E, Khasenov, M, Skakov, M, Gordienko, Y, Samarkhanov, K, Kotlyar, A, et al.. High-energy tritium ion and α-particle release from the near-surface layer of lithium during neutron irradiation in the nuclear reactor core. Fusion Sci Technol 2024;80:520–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2023.2229682.Search in Google Scholar
10. Yokoyama, R, Kondo, M, Suzuki, S, Journeau, C, Pellegrini, M, Okamoto, K. Evaluation of molten corium spreading and sedimentation behaviors within primary containment vessel in Unit 3 of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant toward the best prediction of fuel debris distribution. Nucl Technol 2024;210:884–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2023.2262255.Search in Google Scholar
11. Bhaduri, A, Choudhury, D. Closed‐form solution for natural frequency of flexible combined pile‐raft foundation. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 2024;53:515–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4031.Search in Google Scholar
12. Makeyeva, IR, Pugachev, VY, Shmidt, OV, Rykunova, AA, Shadrin, AY. Computational substantiation of technological characteristics of the closure stage of nuclear fuel cycle using code VIZART. Nucl Eng Technol 2024;10:47–54. https://doi.org/10.3897/nucet.10.123052.Search in Google Scholar
13. Wu, D, Zhang, C, Ji, L, Ran, R, Wu, H, Xu, Y. Forest fire recognition based on feature extraction from multi-view images. Trait Du Signal 2021;38. https://doi.org/10.18280/ts.380324.Search in Google Scholar
14. Orlov, AI, Gabaraev, BA. Heavy liquid metal cooled fast reactors: peculiarities and development status of the major projects. Nucl Eng Technol 2023;9:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3897/nucet.9.90993.Search in Google Scholar
15. racane, D, Tillement, S, Garcias, F. The evolution of nuclear energy in the world and in France. Nucl Econ 1 Nucl Fuel Cycle Eco Anal 2024:1–54.10.1002/9781394257348.ch1Search in Google Scholar
16. Lemsara, F, Bouzid, T, Yahiaoui, D, Mamen, B, Saadi, M. Seismic fragility of a single pillar-column under near and far fault soil motion with consideration of soil-pile interaction. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res 2023;13:9819–24. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.5405.Search in Google Scholar
17. Cibula, M, Pellegrini, M, Mizokami, M, Mizokami, S. Evaluation of Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1 ex-vessel phenomenon leveraging on primary containment vessel robotic inspections. Nucl Technol 2024:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2024.2339578.Search in Google Scholar
18. Kalshoven, PT. The skyline is changing: editing space and discourse in nuclear decommissioning. Vis Anthropol 2023;36:487–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2023.2280426.Search in Google Scholar
19. Mulkapuri, S, Siddikha, A, Ravi, A, Saha, P, Kumar, AV, Boodida, S, et al.. Electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution by a uranium (VI) polyoxometalate: an environmental toxin for sustainable energy generation. Inorg Chem 2023;62:19664–76. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c03018.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Singh, T. Reactor physics of research reactors at BARC: aspects and scopes. Nucl Part Phys Proc 2023;339:160–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2023.09.002.Search in Google Scholar
21. Yoshikawa, M, Seki, A, Okita, S, Takaya, S, Yan, X. Improvement of a reinforcement learning model to assist operators in controlling a nuclear power plant under abnormal operating conditions. Nucl Eng Des 2025;444:114350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114350.Search in Google Scholar
22. Ross, LM. Nuclear cultural heritage: from energy past to heritage future. Herit Soc 2024;17:296–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032x.2023.2266644.Search in Google Scholar
23. Cho, SG, Shin, JH, Lee, SJ. Robust diagnosis of abnormal events using fuzzy-based feature extraction in nuclear power plants. Prog Nucl Energy 2025;185:105765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.105765.Search in Google Scholar
24. Veerappermal Devarajan, M, Sambas, A. Data-driven techniques for real-time safety management in tunnel engineering using TBM data. Int J Eng Res 2022;7.Search in Google Scholar
25. Dinesh, K, Gudivaka, BR, Gudivaka, RL, Gudivaka, RK. Enhanced Fault diagnosis in IoT: uniting data fusion with deep multi-scale fusion neural network. Internet Thing 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101361.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston