Frontmatter

Articles in the same Issue

1. Frontmatter
2. Editorial
3. Defining analytical performance specifications 15 years after the Stockholm conference
4. Consensus Statement
5. Defining analytical performance specifications: Consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
6. Opinion Papers
7. The 1999 Stockholm Consensus Conference on quality specifications in laboratory medicine
8. Setting analytical performance specifications based on outcome studies – is it possible?
9. Performance criteria based on true and false classification and clinical outcomes. Influence of analytical performance on diagnostic outcome using a single clinical component
10. Analytical performance specifications based on how clinicians use laboratory tests. Experiences from a post-analytical external quality assessment programme
11. Rationale for using data on biological variation
12. Reliability of biological variation data available in an online database: need for improvement
13. A checklist for critical appraisal of studies of biological variation
14. Optimizing the use of the “state-of-the-art” performance criteria
15. Are regulation-driven performance criteria still acceptable? – The German point of view
16. Performance criteria for reference measurement procedures and reference materials
17. Performance criteria for combined uncertainty budget in the implementation of metrological traceability
18. How to define a significant deviation from the expected internal quality control result
19. Analytical performance specifications for EQA schemes – need for harmonisation
20. Proposal for the modification of the conventional model for establishing performance specifications
21. Before defining performance criteria we must agree on what a “qualitative test procedure” is
22. Performance criteria and quality indicators for the pre-analytical phase
23. Performance criteria of the post-analytical phase