Home Linguistics & Semiotics The universal force of (strict) negative concord
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The universal force of (strict) negative concord

  • Petr Rossyaykin
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Negative Concord: A Hundred Years On
This chapter is in the book Negative Concord: A Hundred Years On

Abstract

In this paper I focus on the data from Eurasian languages and argue for the following interrelated points: (I) the distinction between strict and non-strict negative concord (NC) is not reducible to any external parametric variation; different types of NC involve inherently different items, which should be delinked from each other rather than fall under a unified analysis. (II) Instead, negative concord items (NCIs) in strict NC should be regarded as a subspecies of non-negative wh-based items with universal force, which are especially common in the languages of Asia. (III) The universal force of NCIs, non-negative universals and some other constructions is contributed by a scalar-additive particle (mo-particle), apparently the same item in all the languages in question. (IV) If NCIs are analyzed as universals outscoping negation, NC is functionally motivated as it grammaticalizes the Neg-First principle. (V) NCIs of the relevant type (wh-stem + a scalar-additive particle) syntactically agree with a negation marker but all other NCIs are not involved in syntactic agreement with negation.

Abstract

In this paper I focus on the data from Eurasian languages and argue for the following interrelated points: (I) the distinction between strict and non-strict negative concord (NC) is not reducible to any external parametric variation; different types of NC involve inherently different items, which should be delinked from each other rather than fall under a unified analysis. (II) Instead, negative concord items (NCIs) in strict NC should be regarded as a subspecies of non-negative wh-based items with universal force, which are especially common in the languages of Asia. (III) The universal force of NCIs, non-negative universals and some other constructions is contributed by a scalar-additive particle (mo-particle), apparently the same item in all the languages in question. (IV) If NCIs are analyzed as universals outscoping negation, NC is functionally motivated as it grammaticalizes the Neg-First principle. (V) NCIs of the relevant type (wh-stem + a scalar-additive particle) syntactically agree with a negation marker but all other NCIs are not involved in syntactic agreement with negation.

Downloaded on 7.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111202273-006/html
Scroll to top button