Startseite Evolution, “Pseudo-science,” and Satire: Edith Wharton’s “The Descent of Man”
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Evolution, “Pseudo-science,” and Satire: Edith Wharton’s “The Descent of Man”

  • Judith P. Saunders
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. Dezember 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The protagonist of Edith Wharton’s 1904 short story “The Descent of Man” is both scien­tist and satirist. The target of his satire-“false interpreters” of evolutionary theory-allows Wharton to combine analysis of genre with inquiry into the cultural controversy Darwin’s ideas inspired. Anthropocentric anxieties explain popular preference for soothing “pseudo-science” over unsparing accounts of natural selection; they likewise explain widespread obtuseness to Professor Linyard’s ridicule of hazy illogic posing as science. Motivated more strongly by fitness interests than by allegiance to scientific truth, however, the professor becomes complicit in widespread misreading of his own text. He thereby encourages the ignorance he intended to dispel, and Wharton highlights the ironies inherent in this self-sabotage. She insists that susceptibility to evolved adaptations is universal, moreover, and that it often impedes the discovery and promulgation of truth.

Published Online: 2022-12-14
Published in Print: 2022-12-01

© 2022 by Academic Studies Press

Heruntergeladen am 14.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.26613/esic.6.2.299/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen