Abstract
In this paper, we have analyzed a whole set of data of gapping in Mandarin Chinese from a novel point of view and fleshed out a bi-sentential derivation analysis for the formation of this construction. While taking the canonical gapping in English as a reference, we have explored some idiomatic properties of the relevant structures in Chinese and summarized core differences: the gapping constructions in English follow a strict rule of sentence grammar while those of Chinese have demonstrated kind of inter-sentential effect. We propose that such differences can be attributed to the prosodic factors: The Constraint on Sentential Intonation in Chinese (CSIC for short), firstly proposed in Feng (Feng, Shengli. 2017. Hanyu jufa zhongyin yudiao xianghu zuoyong de yufa xiaoying. ‘On grammatical effects of interactions between intonation, stress and syntax’. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Study] (1). 1–15), bans the occurrence of the coordinate [VP & VP] structures, and thus two parallel but separate sentences are used in the contexts where a sentence with VP coordination in English is used. Then, the verb in the second sentence is deleted at PF under the identity condition. Consequently, the gapping structures thus formed demonstrate their own unique properties and are different from the canonical gapping in English. The result of our discussion indicates that prosody can play a role in accounting for language specificities as well as cross-linguistic variations.
Funding source: Humanities and Social Sciences Fund of the Ministry of Education “Morphological Prosody and Its Typologies in Chinese Dialects”
Award Identifier / Grant number: 22YJC740057
Funding source: Youth Innovation Team Development Plan of Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province “Multilingual Language Education and Service Innovation Team”
Award Identifier / Grant number: Z6622002
List of Abbreviations
- ASP
-
aspect
- BA
-
marker of the ba construction
- BEI
-
passive marker “被”
- C0
-
complementizer
- CL
-
classifier
- DE
-
NP modification marker “的”
- PRT
-
particle
- T0
-
tense
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the referee for the pertinent and helpful comments that allow us to improve various aspects of this article. Special thanks go to Editor-in-chief Prof. Harry van der Hulst for his kindness and patience in helping find the reviewers. This research was supported by the Humanities and Social Sciences Fund of the Ministry of Education “Morphological Prosody and Its Typologies in Chinese Dialects” (22YJC740057). The corresponding author was supported by Youth Innovation Team Development Plan of Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province “Multilingual Language Education and Service Innovation Team” (Z6622002).
-
Research funding: This work was supported by the Humanities and Social Sciences Fund of the Ministry of Education “Morphological Prosody and Its Typologies in Chinese Dialects” (22YJC740057) and Youth Innovation Team Development Plan of Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province “Multilingual Language Education and Service Innovation Team” (Z6622002).
References
Ai, Ruixi Ressy. 2014. Topic-comment structure, focus movement and gapping formation. Linguistic Inquiry 45(1). 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00150.Suche in Google Scholar
An, Duk-Ho. 2007. Clauses in non-canonical positions at the syntax-phonology interface. Syntax 10. 38–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2007.00096.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Anttila, Arto. 2016. Phonological effects on syntactic variation. Annual Review of Linguistics 2. 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040845.Suche in Google Scholar
Barker, Chris. 2013. Scopability and sluicing. Linguistics and Philosophy 36. 187–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-013-9137-1.Suche in Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel. 2016. Intonation and meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226269.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Cao, Yu. 2016. Passing on the contrast: Systematic symmetric contrast in subordinate gapping-like ellipsis in Chinese. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Master thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Chen, Mathew Y. 2002. Tone Sandhi: Patterns across Chinese dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Laishen. 1991. On the typology of wh-questions. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 2023. The interrogative left periphery: How a clause becomes a question. Linguistic Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00507 (Epub ahead of print).Suche in Google Scholar
Elfner, Emily. 2012. Syntax-prosody interactions in Irish. Amherst: University of Massachusetts PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Feng, Shengli. 1995. Prosodic structures and prosodically constrained syntax in Chinese. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Feng, Shengli. 2003a. Prosodically constrained postverbal PPs in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 41(6). 1085–1122. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.035.Suche in Google Scholar
Feng, Shengli. 2003b. Prosodically motivated and syntactically licensed developments of VR and Adv-V forms in classical Chinese. In Xu Jie (ed.), Chinese syntax and semantics, 225–256. Singapore: Prentice Hall Press.10.4324/9781351263283-5Suche in Google Scholar
Feng, Shengli. 2015. Shengdiao, yudiao he hanyu de jumo yuqici ‘Tone, intonation and the sentence final particle in Chinese’. Yuyanxue Luncong [Linguistic Forum] 51. 52–79.Suche in Google Scholar
Feng, Shengli. 2017. Hanyu jufa zhongyin yudiao xianghu zuoyong de yufa xiaoying. ‘On grammatical effects of interactions between intonation, stress and syntax’. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Study] (1). 1–15.Suche in Google Scholar
Feng, Shengli. 2019. Prosodic syntax in Chinese. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781351263245Suche in Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline. 2017. Intonation and prosodic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139022064Suche in Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline & Katharina Hartmann. 2005. The focus and prosodic structure of German right node raising and gapping. The Linguistic Review 22. 69–116. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2005.22.1.69.Suche in Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.). 2016. The Oxford handbook of information structure. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Fu, Yu. 2012. Xiandai Hanyu zhong cunzai dongci kongque ju ma ‘Does gapping exist in Modern Chinese. Waiguoyu [Journal of Foreign Languages] 35(5). 24–34.Suche in Google Scholar
Fu, Yu. 2019. Yinghan shenglue jiegou de xingshi duibi yanjiu ‘A comparative study of elliptical constructions in Chinese and English: A formal approach’. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Griffiths, James & Anikó Lipták. 2014. Contrast and island-sensitivity in clausal ellipsis. Syntax 17. 189–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12018.Suche in Google Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge. 1973. Unacceptable ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry 4(1). 17–68.Suche in Google Scholar
Hartmann, Katharina. 2000. Right node raising and gapping: Interface conditions on prosodic deletion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.106Suche in Google Scholar
He, Chuansheng. 2007. Dongci kongque, zuobianjie shenglue ji yinghan zhuyu de weizhi ‘Gapping, LPD, and subject positions in English and Chinese’. Xiandai Waiuyu [Modern Foreign Languages] 30(2). 124–134.Suche in Google Scholar
Hu, Mingyang. 1987. Beijinghua Chutan ‘A preliminary study of Mandarin Chinese’. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Hu, Mingyang & Song Jin. 1989. Liushuiju chutan ‘A preliminary study of flowing sentences in Chinese’. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] (4). 42–54.Suche in Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 2017. Syntactic analyticity and the principles and parameters of universal grammar. Lecture given at Chinese University of Hong Kong. 2017-12-06.Suche in Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, Audrey Yen-hui Li & Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1971. Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2(1). 21–35.Suche in Google Scholar
Jacobson, Pauline. 2014. Ellipsis in categorial grammar. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck & Tanja Temmerman (eds.), Handbook of ellipsis, 46–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil A. 1990. Incomplete VP deletion and gapping. Linguistic Analysis 20. 64–81.Suche in Google Scholar
Johnson, Kyle. 1994. Bridging the gap. Ms., Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Suche in Google Scholar
Johnson, Kyle. 2004. In search of the English middle field. Ms., Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Suche in Google Scholar
Johnson, Kyle. 2009. Gapping is not (VP)-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 40(2). 289–328. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.289.Suche in Google Scholar
Johnson, Kyle. 2014. Gapping. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Suche in Google Scholar
Kandybowicz, Jason. 2015. On prosodic vacuity and verbal resumption in Asante Twi. Linguistic Inquiry 46(2). 243–272. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00181.Suche in Google Scholar
Kubota, Yusuke & Robert Levine. 2016. Gapping as hypothetical reasoning. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34(1). 107–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9298-4.Suche in Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 1986. Intonational phrasing: The case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology 3. 311–340. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700000671.Suche in Google Scholar
Larson, Richard. 1990. Double objects revisited: Reply to Jackendoff. Linguistic Inquiry 21. 589–632.Suche in Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 1999. Pseudo-gapping puzzles. In Shalom Lappin & Elabbas Benmamoun (eds.), Fragments: Studies in ellipsis and gapping, 141–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195123029.003.0007Suche in Google Scholar
Li, Audrey Yen-hui. 1998. Argument determiner phrases and number phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.1998.29.4.693.Suche in Google Scholar
Li, Audrey Yen-hui & Wei Haley Wei. 2019. Microparameters and language variation. Glossia 4(1). 1–34. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.938.Suche in Google Scholar
Li, Mei-Du. 1988. Anaphoric structures of Chinese. Taipei: Student Book Co, Ltd.Suche in Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark & Alain Prince. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 249–336.Suche in Google Scholar
Lin, Vivian. 2002. Coordination and sharing at the interfaces. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Liu, Danqing. 2008. Binglie jiegou de jufa xianzhi ji chubu jieshi ‘A preliminary explanation of the syntactic constraints of coordinate structures’. In Yufa Yanjiu he Tansuo [Explorations of Grammar], vol. 14. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Lu, Jianming. 2013. Xiandai hanyu yufa jiaocheng ‘Chinese grammar study: A course book’. Beijing: Beijing University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Ma, Baopeng & Huibin Zhuang. 2022. Prosody and sentencehood in Chinese – A case study with reference to Chinese-English comparison. Lingua 270. 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103217.Suche in Google Scholar
Mathieu, Éric. 2016. The wh-parameter and radical externalization. In Luis Eguren, Olga Fernández-Soriano & Amaya Mendikoetxea (eds.), Rethinking parameters, 252–291. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190461737.003.0009Suche in Google Scholar
Mei, Guang. 2003. Yingjie yige kaozhengxue he yuyanxue jiehe de hanyu yufashi yanjiu xinjumian ‘embracing a new prospect of combining textual study and linguistics in studying the history of Chinese grammar’. In Dah-an Ho (ed.), Historical development of Chinese language, 23–47. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology of Academia Sinica.Suche in Google Scholar
Mei, Guang. 2015. Shanggu hanyu yufa gangyao ‘An outline of Classical Chinese grammar’. Taipei: Sanmin Book Company Limited.Suche in Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199243730.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 2007. Prosodic phonology (with a new foreword). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110977790Suche in Google Scholar
Oehrle, Richard T. 1987. Boolean properties in the analysis of gapping. In Geoffrey J. Huck & Almerindo E. Ojeda (eds.), Discontinuous constituency, 203–240. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004373204_009Suche in Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. 1999. Verb-gapping in Chinese: A case of verb raising. Lingua 107. 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-3841(98)00040-0.Suche in Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1982. Paths and categories. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 365–424.Suche in Google Scholar
Potter, David, Frazier Michael & Masaya Yoshida. 2017. A two-source hypothesis for gapping. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 35. 1123–1160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9359-y.Suche in Google Scholar
Repp, Sophie. 2009. Negation in gapping. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543601.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 2016. Contiguity theory. Cambridge, M.A.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/10542.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Suche in Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints and variables in syntax. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan. 1976. Deletion and logical form. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Sato, Yosuke & Yoshihito Dobashi. 2016. Prosodic phrasing and the that-trace effect. Linguistic Inquiry 47(2). 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00213.Suche in Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan C. L. Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn., 435–484. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444343069.ch14Suche in Google Scholar
Shi, Yuzhi. 2016. Hanyu Yufa Yanhuashi ‘The evolution of Chinese grammar’. Nanchang: Jiangxi Education Publishing House.Suche in Google Scholar
Siegel, Muffy E. A. 1987. Compositionality, case, and the scope of auxiliaries. Linguistics and Philosophy 10(1). 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00603392.Suche in Google Scholar
Takahashi, Shoichi. 2004. Pseudogapping and cyclic linearization. In Keir Moulton & Matthew Wolf (eds.), NELS 34, 571–585. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistic Student Association.Suche in Google Scholar
Tai, James Hau-Y. 1969. Coordination reduction. Bloomington: Indiana University PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Tang, Sze-Ying. 2001. The (non)-existence of gapping in Chinese and its implications for the theory of gapping. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10(3). 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011250802691.10.1023/A:1011250802691Suche in Google Scholar
Thoms, Gary. 2016. Pseudogapping, parallelism, and the scope of focus. Syntax 19(3). 286–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12122.Suche in Google Scholar
Toosarvandani, Maziar. 2016. Embedding the antecedent in gapping: Low coordination and the role of parallelism. Linguistic Inquiry 47(2). 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00216.Suche in Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 219–256. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554048.Suche in Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2007. The syntax-phonology interface. In Paul de Lacy (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology, 435–456. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486371.019Suche in Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 1994. On economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Wang, Hongjun & Rong Li. 2014. Lun hanyu yupian de jiben danwei he liushuiju de chengyin ‘On the primitive unit of discourse in Chinese and the cause of flowing sentences’. Yuyanxue Luncong [Essays on linguistics] 49. 11–40.Suche in Google Scholar
Wang, Zhu. 2017. Jiyu xinxi jiegou lilun de xiandai hanyu kongque ju yanjiu ‘Modern Chinese gapping sentences: An information structure perspective’. Beijing: Beijing Foreign Studies University Master thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Wei, Ting-Chi. 2011. Subordinate gaps in Mandarin Chinese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 9. 51–88.Suche in Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1977. Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 101–139.Suche in Google Scholar
Winkler, Susanne. 2005. Ellipsis and focus in generative grammar. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110890426Suche in Google Scholar
Wu, H.-H. Iris. 2003. On ellipsis and gapping in Mandarin Chinese. Hsinchu: National Tsinghua University Master thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Yang, Rongxiang. 2010. Er zai shanggu hanyu yufa xitong zhong de zhongyao diwei ‘On the importance of er in the Classical Chinese grammar’. Hanyushi Xuebao [Journal of Chinese Language History] 10. 110–119.Suche in Google Scholar
Yang, Rongxiang. 2011. Shanggu hanyu liandong gongbin jiegou de shuailuo ‘The disappearance of the object-sharing coordination in Archaic Chinese’. Zhongguo Yuyanxue [Linguistics in China] 5. 82–93.Suche in Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi. 1982. Yufa Jiangyi ‘Lectures on Chinese grammar’. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi. 1985. Yufa Dawen ‘Questions and answers in Chinese grammar’. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Lusia. 1998. Prosody, focus and word order. Cambridge, MS: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 2016. Information structure and nuclear stress. In Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), The Oxford handbook on information structure, 165–184. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Coordination versus separation: difference of gapping between Chinese and English and its prosodic attribution
- On the verb-raising analysis of non-constituent coordination in Japanese
- Force mismatch in clausal ellipsis
- Simplifying the theoretical treatment of wager verbs
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Coordination versus separation: difference of gapping between Chinese and English and its prosodic attribution
- On the verb-raising analysis of non-constituent coordination in Japanese
- Force mismatch in clausal ellipsis
- Simplifying the theoretical treatment of wager verbs