Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik The many errors of Vyvyan Evans’ The Language Myth
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The many errors of Vyvyan Evans’ The Language Myth

  • Nicholas Allott EMAIL logo und Georges Rey
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 9. Juni 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Vyvyan Evans’ The Language Myth argues that Chomsky’s program of Universal Grammar (UG) is “completely wrong,” and it has attracted much recent discussion, some of it laudatory. We set out what we take to be its many serious errors, including: (i) a misunderstanding of the empirical character of the evidence that Chomsky and other generativists have adduced for UG, in English as well as in many other languages, coupled with a mistaken claim that the theory is unfalsifiable; (ii) a confusion of superficial typological universals, or features present at the surface of all of the world’s languages, with UG features that are apparent only under analysis; and (iii) a failure to appreciate the significance of Fine Thoughts (the things one cannot say in natural languages, even though it would be clear what they would mean) as critical evidence of UG, and of the difficulties presented by them for the kinds of “language-as-use” and related empiricist theories that he favors. Indeed, Evans also (iv) fails to address the issues of competence and constraints that are raised by Fine Thoughts and that are a central concern of UG; and (v) conflates UG with a computational theory of mind, a Fodorean conception of modules and a Pinkerean interest in the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis.

References

Ackerman, Farrell & Robert Malouf. 2016. Beyond caricatures: Commentary on Evans 2014. Language 92(1). 189–194.10.1353/lan.2016.0008Suche in Google Scholar

Adger, David. 2003. Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Adger, David. 2015a. More misrepresentation: A response to Behme and Evans 2015. Lingua 162. 160–166.10.1016/j.lingua.2015.05.005Suche in Google Scholar

Adger, David. 2015b. Mythical myths: Comments on Vyvyan Evans’ “The Language Myth”. Lingua 158. 7–80.10.1016/j.lingua.2015.02.006Suche in Google Scholar

Adger, David & Jennifer Smith. 2005. Variation and the minimalist program. In Leonie Cornips & Karen Corrigan (eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social, 149–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/cilt.265.10adgSuche in Google Scholar

Åfarli, Tor A. & Brit Mæhlum (eds.). 2014. The sociolinguistics of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.154Suche in Google Scholar

Aldridge, Michelle. 2014. The Language Myth: Why Language Is Not an Instinct, by Vyvyan Evans. Times Higher Education 13 November 2014. Available at https://www.timeshighereducation.com/books/the-language-myth-why-language-is-not-an-instinct-by-vyvyan-evans/2016831.article Retrieved 15 May 2017.Suche in Google Scholar

Anderson, Alun. 2014. Why language is neither an instinct nor innate. New Scientist 20 October 2014. Available at https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22429911.000-why-language-is-neither-an-instinct-nor-innate/ Retrieved 15 May 2017.Suche in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark C. 2001. The atoms of language. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Beaumont, Bertrand. 1954. Hegel and the seven planets. Mind LXIII(250). 246–248.10.1093/mind/LXIII.250.246Suche in Google Scholar

Behme, Christina & Vyvyan Evans. 2015. Leaving the myth behind: A reply to Adger (2015). Lingua 162. 149–159.10.1016/j.lingua.2015.05.004Suche in Google Scholar

Berent, Iris. 2016. Evans’ (2014) Modularity myths: A mental architecture digest. Language 92(1). 195–19710.1353/lan.2016.0012Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1959. Review of B. F. Skinner, ‘Verbal behavior’. Language 35. 26–58.10.2307/411334Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.10.21236/AD0616323Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1979. Morphophonemics of modern Hebrew. New York: Garland.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1988. Language and problems of knowledge: The managua lectures. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811937Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2002. On nature and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613876Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2015. Some core contested concepts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 44(1). 91–104.10.1007/s10936-014-9331-5Suche in Google Scholar

Churchland, Patricia S. 2013. Preface to Quine, Willard Van Ormson. 2013 [1960]. In Word and object, 2nd edn. Cambridge, Mass: MIT PressSuche in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo & Richard S. Kayne (eds.). 2005. The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax. Oxford: Oxford University PressSuche in Google Scholar

Cornips, Leonie. 2014. Socio-syntax and variation in acquisition: Problematizing monolingual and bidialectal acquisition. Linguistic Variation 14(1). 1–25.10.1075/lv.14.1.01corSuche in Google Scholar

Cornips, Leonie E. A. & Karen P. Corrigan (eds.). 2005. Syntax and variation : Reconciling the biological and the social. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.265Suche in Google Scholar

Deen, Kamil U. 2016. Myths, magic, and poorly drawn battle lines: Commentary on Evans 2014. Language 92(1). 197–200.10.1353/lan.2016.0015Suche in Google Scholar

Dennett, Daniel C. 1975. Why the law of effect will not go away. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 5. 169–187. Reprinted in (1978). Brainstorms : Philosophical essays on mind and psychology, 71–89. Montgomery, Vt.: Bradford Books.10.1111/j.1468-5914.1975.tb00350.xSuche in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(5). 429–448.10.1017/S0140525X0999094XSuche in Google Scholar

Everett, Daniel. 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Current Anthropology 46(4). 621–646.10.1086/431525Suche in Google Scholar

Fitch, W. Tecumseh, Marc D. Hauser & Noam Chomsky. 2005. The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition 97. 179–210.10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005Suche in Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry A. 1968. The appeal to tacit knowledge in psychological explanation. The Journal of Philosophy 65(20). 627–640.10.2307/2024316Suche in Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry A. 2000. The mind doesn’t work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4627.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work : The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2016. Another look at the universal grammar hypothesis: Commentary on Evans 2014. Language 92(1). 200–203.10.1353/lan.2016.0018Suche in Google Scholar

Gross, Steven & Georges Rey. 2012. Innateness. In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (eds.), Oxford handbook on cognitive science, 318–360. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195309799.003.0014Suche in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane M. V. 1994. Introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Hauser, Marc D., Robert C. Charles Yang, Ian Tattersall Berwick, Michael J. Ryan, Jeffrey Watumull, Noam Chomsky & Richard C. Lewontin. 2014. The mystery of language evolution. Frontiers in Psychology 5. 1–12.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00401Suche in Google Scholar

Hinzen, Wolfram. 2016. Is our mental grammar just a set of constructions? Commentary on Evans (2014). Language 92(1). 203–20710.1353/lan.2016.0021Suche in Google Scholar

Hofmeister, Philip, Laura Staum Casasanto & Ivan A. Sag. 2013. Islands in the grammar? Standards of evidence. In Jon Sprouse & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Experimental syntax and island effects, 42–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139035309.004Suche in Google Scholar

Hornstein, Norbert. 2013. Three grades of grammatical involvement: Syntax from a minimalist perspective. Mind & Language 28(4). 392–420.10.1111/mila.12023Suche in Google Scholar

Karimi, Simin (ed.). 2003. Word order and scrambling. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470758403Suche in Google Scholar

Kegl, Judy, Anne Senghas & Marie Coppola. 1999. Creation through contact: Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In Michel DeGraff (ed.), Language creation and language change : Creolization, diachrony, and development, 179–237. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lidz, Jeffrey & Annie Gagliardi. 2015. How nature meets nurture: Universal grammar and statistical learning. Annual Review of Linguistics 1(1). 333–353.10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125236Suche in Google Scholar

Lidz, Jeffrey & Alexander Williams. 2009. Constructions on holiday. Cognitive Linguistics 20(1). 177–189.10.1515/COGL.2009.011Suche in Google Scholar

Maynes, Jeffrey & Steven Gross. 2013. Linguistic intuitions. Philosophy Compass 8(8). 714–730.10.1111/phc3.12052Suche in Google Scholar

Müller, Gereon. 2011. Constraints on displacement: A phase-based approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.7Suche in Google Scholar

Musso, Mariacristina, Andrea Moro, Volkmar Glauche, Michel Rijntjes, Jurgen Reichenbach, Christian Buchel & Cornelius Weiller. 2003. Broca’s area and the language instinct. Nature Neuroscience 6(7). 774–781.10.1038/nn1077Suche in Google Scholar

Nevins, Andrew. 2009. On formal universals in phonology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 32(05). 461–462.10.1017/S0140525X09990537Suche in Google Scholar

Nevins, Andrew, David Pesetsky & Cilene Rodrigues. 2009. Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment. Language 85(2). 355–404.10.1353/lan.0.0107Suche in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 1994. The language instinct. London: Penguin.10.1037/e412952005-009Suche in Google Scholar

Prinz, Jesse J. 2002. Furnishing the mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press10.7551/mitpress/3169.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Radford, Andrew. 2009. An introduction to English sentence structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511800924Suche in Google Scholar

Rey, Georges. 2002. Searle’s misunderstandings of functionalism and strong AI. In John Preston & Mark Bishop (eds.), Views into the Chinese room, 201–225. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Rey, Georges. 2003. Intentional content and a Chomskyan linguistics, in A. Barber (ed.), Epistemology of language, 140–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Rey, Georges. ms. Representation and Other Philosophical Issues in a Chomskyan Linguistics. Under review at Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian G. 1997. Comparative syntax. London: Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Sag, Ivan A., Thomas Wasow & Emily M. Bender. 2003. Syntactic theory : A formal introduction, 2nd edn. Stanford, Calif.: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Suche in Google Scholar

Sandler, Wendy. 2010. The uniformity and diversity of language: Evidence from sign language. Lingua 120(12). 2727–2732.10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.015Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, Neil V. & Nicholas Allott. 2016. Chomsky: Ideas and ideals, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139979634Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, Neil V. & Ianthi-Maria Tsimpli. 1995. The mind of a savant: Language learning and modularity. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Jon & Norbert Hornstein (eds.). 2013. Experimental syntax and island effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139035309Suche in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Jon, Carson T. Schütze & Diogo Almeida. 2013. A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua 134. 219–248.10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002Suche in Google Scholar

Wijnen, Frank. 2016. Not compelling: Commentary on Evans 2014. Language 92(1). 207–209.10.1353/lan.2016.0003Suche in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations (Gertrude E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, Charles. 2002. Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: Oxford University PressSuche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-6-9
Published in Print: 2017-8-28

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 7.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tlr-2017-0011/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen