Startseite Mathematik On the weakly(α, ψ, ξ)-contractive condition for multi-valued operators in metric spaces and related fixed point results
Artikel Open Access

On the weakly(α, ψ, ξ)-contractive condition for multi-valued operators in metric spaces and related fixed point results

  • Marwan Amin Kutbi und Wutiphol Sintunavarat EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 29. März 2016

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to introduce the concept of a new nonlinear multi-valued mapping so called weakly (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping and prove fixed point results for such mappings in metric spaces. Our results unify, generalize and complement various results from the literature. We give some examples which support our main results while previous results in literature are not applicable. Also, we analyze the existence of fixed points for mappings satisfying a general contractive inequality of integral type. Many fixed point results for multi-valued mappings in metric spaces endowed with an arbitrary binary relation and metric spaces endowed with graph are given here to illustrate the results in this paper.

MSC 2010: 47H10; 54H25

1 Introduction and preliminaries

First, in this section, we recollect some essential notations, required definitions and primary results coherent with the literature.

For a nonempty set X, we denote by N(X) the class of all nonempty subsets of X. Let (X, d) be a metric space. We denote by CL(X) the class of all nonempty closed subsets of X and by CB(X) the class of all nonempty closed bounded subsets of X. The Pompeiu-Hausdorff metric on CL(X) induced by d is the function H defined by

H(A,B)={max{supaAd(a,B),supbBd(b,A)},if maximum exists;,otherwise

for all A, BCL(X), where d(a, B) = inf{d(a, b) : bB} is the distance from a to BX.

Throughout this paper, we denote by ℕ, ℝ+ and ℝ the sets of positive integers, non-negative real numbers and real numbers, respectively. Also, we denote Φ by the class of all nondecreasing functions ψ : [0, ∞) → [0, ∞) satisfying Σn=1ψn(t)< for all t > 0, where ψn is the nth iterate of ψ. For each ψ ∈ Φ, we can easily see that ψ(t) < t for each t > 0 and ψ(t ) = 0 if and only if t = 0 (see more detail in [1]).

In 2012, Samet et al. [1] introduced the concepts of α-ψ -contractive mapping and α-admissible mapping as follows:

Definition 1.1

([1]). Let (X, d) be a metric space and t : XX be a mapping. A mapping t is called an α-ψ-contractive mapping if there exist two functions α : X × X → [0, ∞)and ψ ∈ Φsuch that

α(x,y)d(tx,ty)ψ(d(x,y))

for all x, yX.

Definition 1.2

([1]). Let t be a self-mapping on a nonempty set X and α: X × X → [0, ∞)be a mapping. A mapping t is said to be α-admissible if the following condition holds:

x,yXwithα(x,y)1α(tx,ty)1.

They studied fixed point results for such mappings in metric spaces and also showed that the results can be utilized to derive some fixed point results in partially ordered metric spaces.

On the other hand, von Neumann [2] first studied fixed point results for a multi-valued (set-valued) mappings in game theory. Afterward, investigations on the existence of fixed points for multi-valued contraction mappings in the setting of metric spaces were initiated by Nadler [3] in 1969. Using the concept of the Pompeiu-Hausdorff metric, he established multi-valued version of Banach’s contraction principle [4], which is usually referred as Nadler’s contraction principle. Many modifications and generalizations of Nadler’s contraction principle have been developed in successive years.

In 2012, Asl et al. [5] extended the concept of the α-admissible mapping from single-valued mappings to multivalued mappings so called α*-admissible multi-valued mapping and introduced the concept of the α*-ψ-contractive multi-valued mapping as follows:

Definition 1.3

([5]). Let X be a nonempty set, T : X → N(X) and α :X × X → [0, ∞)be two mappings. A mapping T is said to be α*--admissible if the following condition holds:

x,yXwithα(x,y)1α*(Tx,Ty)1,

where α*(Tx, Ty) := inf{α(a, b) :aTx, bTy.

Definition 1.4

([5]). Let (X, d) be a metric space. A multi-valued mapping T :XCL(X) is called an α*-ψ-contractive mapping if there exist two functions ψ ∈ Φ and α :X × X → [0, ∞)such that

α*(Tx,Ty)H(Tx,Ty)ψ(d(x,y))

for all x, yX.

They also proved fixed point results for α*-ψ-contractive multi-valued mapping by using the concept of α*- admissible mapping.

Throughout this paper, we denote by Ξ the family of all functions ξ : [0, ∞) → [0, i) satisfying the following conditions:

(ξ1)ξ is continuous;

(ξ2)ξ is nondecreasing on [0, ∞);

(ξ3)ξ(t) = 0 if and only if t = 0;

(ξ4)ξ(t) > 0 for all t ∈ (0, ∞);

(ξ5)ξ is subadditive.

Recently, Ali et al. [6] introduced the concept of (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive multi-valued mappings, where ψ ∈ Φ and ξ ∈ Ξ, as follows:

Definition 1.5

([6]). Let (X, d) be a metric space. A multi-valued mapping T :XCL(X) is called (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping if there exist three functions ψ ∈ Φ, ξ ∈ Ξ and α : X × X → [0, ∞)such that the following condition holds:

(1)x,yXwithα(x,y)1ξ(H(Tx,Ty))ψ(ξ(M(x,y))),

whereM(x,y)=max{d(x,y),d(x,Tx),d(y,Ty),d(x,Ty)+d(y,Tx)2}. If ψ is strictly increasing, then T is called a strictly (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping.

They also obtained fixed point results for (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive multi-valued mappings in complete metric spaces by using the following lemma:

Lemma 1.6

([6]). Let (X, d) be a metric space, ξ ∈ Ξ and BCL(X). If there exists xX such that ξ(d(x, B)) > 0, then there exists yB such that

ξ(d(x,y))<qξ(d(x,B)),

where q > 1.

In 2013, Mohammadi et al. [7] extended the concept of an α*-admissible mapping to an α-admissible mapping as follows:

Definition 1.7

([7]). Let X be a nonempty set, T : XN(X) and α :X × X → [0, ∞). A mapping T is said to be α-admissible whenever, for each xX and yTx with α(x, y) > 1, we have α(y, z) > 1 for all zTy.

Remark 1.8

If T is an α*-admissible mapping, then T is also an α-admissible mapping.

For more details of fixed point results and recently related results by using the concepts of α-admissible single valued and α-admissible multi-valued mappings, one can refer to [8-16] and references therein.

In this paper, we introduce the new nonlinear multi-valued mapping so called a weakly (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping which is a generalization of an (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive multi-valued mapping and prove some fixed point results for weakly (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive mappings by using the properties of α-admissible multi-valued mappings. The main results in this paper generalize the main results of Ali et al. [6] and many other results in literature. Also, we give some examples to illustrate our main theorems and show that, from our examples, the results of Ali et al. [6] are not applicable.

Finally, from our main results, we also obtain several fixed point results such as fixed point results for mappings satisfying contractive conditions of integral type, fixed point results in ordinary metric spaces, fixed point results in metric spaces endowed with the arbitrary relation and fixed point results in metric spaces endowed with graph.

2 Main results

In this section, we introduce the concept of a weakly (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping and give fixed point result for such mapping.

Definition 2.1

Let (X, d) be a metric space.

  1. A multi-valued mapping T :XCL(X) is called a weakly (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping if there exist three functions ψ ∈ Φ, ξ ∈ Ξ and α :X × X → [0, ∞)such that the following condition holds:

    (2)xX,yTxwithα(x,y)1ξ(d(y,Ty))ψ(ξ(M(x,y))),

    whereM(x,y)=max{d(x,y),d(x,Tx),d(y,Ty),d(x,Ty)+d(y,Tx)2}.

  2. If ψ is strictly increasing, then the weakly (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping is called a strictly weakly (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping.

Next, we give first main result in this paper.

Theorem 2.2

Let (X, d) be a complete metric space and T :XCL(X) be a strictly weakly (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping satisfying the following conditions:

(S1) T is an α-admissible multi-valued mapping;

(S2) there existx0Xand x1Tx0such thatα(x0,x1) ≥ 1;

(S3) T is a continuous multi-valued mapping.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Proof

For x0, x1 in (S2), if x0 = x1 or x1Tx1, then x1 is a fixed point of T. We have nothing to prove.

So, we assume that x0x1 and x1Tx1. Since x1Tx0 and α(x0,x1) ≥ 1, by the strictly weakly (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive condition of T, we get

(3)0<ξ(d(x1,Tx1))ψ(ξ(max{d(x0,x1),d(x0,Tx0)d(x1,Tx1),d(x0,Tx1)d(x1,Tx0)2}))=ψ(ξ(max{d(x0,x0),d(x1,Tx1),d(x0,Tx1)2}))ψ(ξ(max{d(x0,x1),d(x1,Tx1),d(x0,Tx1)d(x1,Tx1)2}))=ψ(ξ(max{d(x0,x1),d(x1,Tx1)})).

By the property of ψ, the above relation is impossible if max{d(x0,x1),d(x1,Tx1)} = d(x1,Tx1). Hence, from (3), it follows that

(4)0<ξ(d(x1,Tx1))ψ(ξ(d(x0,x1))).

Using Lemma 1.6, there exists x2Tx1 such that

(5)ξ(d(x1,x2))<qξ(d(x1,Tx1)),

where q is a fixed real number such that q > 1. If x1 = x2 or x2Tx2, then x2 is a fixed point of T and hence we have noting to prove. Now, we may assume that x1x2 and x2Tx2. From (4) and (5), we obtain that

(6)0<ξ(d(x1,x2))<qψ(ξ(d(x0,x1))).

Applying ψ in the above inequality, we get

(7)0<ψ(ξ(d(x1,x2)))<ψ(qψ(ξ(d(x0,x1))))

and so

(8)q1:=ψ(qψ(ξ(d(x0,x1))))ψ(ξ(d(x1,x2)))>1.

Since T is an α-admissible multi-valued mapping, we get α(x1, x2) ≥ 1. From the weakly (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive condition of T, we have

(9)0<ξ(d(x2,Tx2))ψ(ξ(max{d(x1,x2),d(x1,Tx1)d(x2,Tx2),d(x1,Tx2)d(x2,Tx1)2}))=ψ(ξ(max{d(x1,x2),d(x2,Tx2),d(x1,Tx2)2}))ψ(ξ(max{d(x1,x2),d(x2,Tx2),d(x1,Tx2)d(x2,Tx2)2}))=ψ(ξ(max{d(x1,x2),d(x2,Tx2)})).

From the above inequality, it follows that and thus

(10)max{d(x1,x2),d(x2,Tx2)}=d(x1,x2)

and thus

(11)0<ξ(d(x2,Tx2))ψ(ξ(d(x1,x2))).

For q1 > 1, by using Lemma 1.6, there exists x3Tx2 such that

(12)ξ(d(x2,x3))<q1ξ(d(x2,Tx2)).

If x2 = x3 or x3Tx3, then x3 is a fixed point of T and hence we have noting to prove. Now, we may assume that x2x3 and x3Tx3. From (11) and (12), we get

(13)0<ξ(d(x2,x3))<q1ψ(ξ(d(x1,x2)))=ψ(qψ(ξ(d(x0,x1)))).

Since ψ is a strictly increasing function, we obtain

(14)0<ψ(ξ(d(x2,x3)))<ψ2(qψ(ξ(d(x0,x1)))).

By continuing this process, we can construct a sequence {xn} in X such that xnxn+1Txn,

(15)a(xn,xn+1)1

and

(16)0<ξ(d(xn+1,xn+2))<ψn(qψ(ξ(d(x0,x1))))

for all n ∈ ℕ∪{0}.

Next, we prove that {xn} is a Cauchy sequence in X. Let m, n ∈ ℕ. Without loss of generality, we may assume that m > n. From the triangle inequality and (16), we obtain

ξ(d(xm,xn))i=nm1ξ(d(xi,xi+1))<i=nm1ψi1(qψ(ξ(d(x0,x1)))).

Using the property of ψ, we get limn,mξ(d(xm,xn))=0.. By the continuity of ξ and (ξ3), we have

(17)limn,md(xmxn)=0

This shows that {xn} is a Cauchy sequence in (X, d). Since (X, d) is a complete metric space, there exists x* ∈ X such that xnx* as n → ∞, that is, limnd(xn,x*)=0. From the continuity of T, we obtain

(18)limnH(Txn,Tx*)=0.

Further, we have

d(x*,Tx*)=limnd(xn+1,Tx*)limnH(Txn,Tx*)=0.

By the closedness of Tx*, we get x* ∈ Tx*. Therefore, x* is a fixed point of T. This completes the proof. □

Next, we give second main result in this paper.

Theorem 2.3

Let (X, d) be a complete metric space and T :XCL(X) be a strictly weakly (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping satisfying the following conditions:

(S1) T is an α-admissible multi-valued mapping;

(S2) there existx0and x1Tx0 such that α(x0, x1) ≥ 1;

(S3)if {xn} is a sequence in X with xn+1Txn, xnxXas n → ∞ and α(xn, xn+1) ≥ 1 for all n ∈ ℕ, then we haveξ(d(xn+1,Tx)) ≥ ψ(ξ(M(xn,x))) for all n ∈ ℕ.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Proof

Following the proof of Theorem 2.2, we can construct a Cauchy sequence {xn} in X such that xnx* as n → ∞ and

(19)α(xn,xn+1)1

for all n ∈ ℕ. From the condition (S3), we get

(20)ξ(d(xn+1,Tx*))ψ(ξ(max{d(xn,x*),d(xn,Txn),d(x*,Tx*),d(xn,Tx*)+d(x*,Txn)2}))

for all n ∈ ℕ. Suppose that d(x*, Tx*) > 0 and let ε:=d(x*,Tx*)2. Since xnx* as n → ∞, we can find N1 ∈ ℕ such that

(21)d(x*,xn)<d(x*,Tx*)2

for all nN1. Furthermore, we obtain

(22)d(x*,Txn)d(x*,xn+1)<d(x*,Tx*)2

for all nN1. Also, since {xn} is a Cauchy sequence, there exists N2 ∈ ℕ such that

(23)d(xn,Txn)d(xn,xn+1)<d(x*,Tx*)2

for all nN2. Since d(xn, Tx*) → d(x*, Tx*) as n → ∞, it follows that there exists N3 ∈ ℕ such that

(24)d(xn,Tx*)<3d(x*,Tx*)2

for all nN3. Using (21)-(24), it follows that

(25)max{d(xn,x*),d(xn,Txn),d(x*,Tx*),d(xn,Tx*)+d(x*,Txn2}=d(x*,Tx*)

for all nN := max{N1, N2, N3}. For each nN, from (20) and the triangle inequality, it follows that

ξ(d(x*,Tx*))ξ(d(x*,xn+1))+ξ(d(xn+1,Tx*))ξ(d(x*,xn+1))+ψ(ξ(max{d(xn,x*),d(xn,Txn),d(x*,Tx*),d(xn,Tx*)+d(x*,Txn)2}))=ξ(d(x*,xn+1))+ψ(ξ(d(x*,Tx*))).

Letting n → ∞ in the above inequality, we get

ξ(d(x*,Tx*))ψ(ξ(d(x*,Tx*))).

This implies that ξ(d(x*,Tx*)) = 0, which is a contradiction. Therefore, d(x*,Tx*)) = 0, that is, x* ∈ Tx*. This completes the proof. □

Next, we give an example to show that our result is more general than the results of Ali et al. [6] and many known results in literature.

Example 2.4

Let X = [0, 100] and the metric d : X × X → ℝ defined by d(x, y) = |xy| for all x, yX. Define T :XCL(X) and α :X × X → [0,∞) by

Tx={[0,x100],x[0,1],[x2+5,50],x(1,5],[x12,100],x(5,100],

and

α(x,y)={1,x,y[0,5],0,otherwise.

Here we show that the contractive condition (1) does not hold for all functions ψ ∈ Ψand ξ ∈ Ξ. Let x = 0 and y = 2. We observe that

α(x,y)=α(0,2)=1,

but

ξ(H(Tx,Ty))=ξ(H(T0,T2))=ξ(9)>ξ(7)>ψ(ξ(7))=ψ(ξ(M(0,2)))=ψ(ξ(M(x,y))).

Therefore, the results of Ali et al. [6] are not applicable here.

Next, we show that Theorem 2.3 can be used to guarantee the existence of fixed point of T. Define the functions ψ, ξ : [0, ∞) → [0, ∞) byψ(t)=t10andξ(t)=tfor all t ∈ [0, ∞). It is easy to see that ψ ∈ Φ and ξ ∈ Ξ. First, we show that T is a strictly weakly (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping. Suppose that xX, yTx and α(x, y) > 1 and hence x ∈ [0,1] and y ∈ [0,0.01]. Also, we obtain

ξd(y,Ty)=d(y,Ty)H(Tx,Ty)=|xy|100=110|xy|110M(x,y)=ψ(ξ(M(x,y))).

It is easy to observe that ψ is a strictly increasing function. Therefore, T is a strictly weakly (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping. It is easy to see that T is an α-admissible multi-valued mapping. Moreover, there exists x0 = 1 ∈ X andx1 = 0.0001 ∈ Tx0such that

α(x0,x1)=α(1,0.0001)1.

Finally, for each sequence {xn} in X with xn+1Txn, xnxX as n → ∞ and α(xn, xn+1 > 1 for all n ∈ ℕ, we get xn, x ∈ [0,1]for all n ∈ ℕ and so

ξ(d(xn+1,Tx)=d(xn+1,Tx)H(Txn,Tx)=|xnx|100=110|xnx|110M(xn,x)=ψ(ξ(M(xn,x))).

Therefore, the condition(s3)in Theorem 2.3 holds. By using Theorem 2.3, we can conclude that T has a fixed point in X. In this case, T has infinitely fixed points such as 0, 6 and 7.

From Remark 1.8, Theorems 2.2 and 2.3 apply particularly in the case when T is an α*-admissible multi-valued mapping.

It is easy to see that the contractive condition (1) implies the contractive condition (2). Therefore, we give the following results without the proof:

Corollary 2.5

(Theorem 2.5 in [6]). Let (X, d) be a complete metric space and T :XCL(X) be a strictly (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping satisfying the following conditions:

(S1) T is an α-admissible (or a* -admissible) multi-valued mapping;

(S2) there exist x0X and x1TX0suchthat α(x0, x1) > 1;

(S3) T is a continuous multi-valued mapping.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Corollary 2.6

(Theorem 2.6 in [6]). Let (X, d) be a complete metric space and T :XCL(X) be a strictly (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping satisfying the following conditions:

(S1) T is an a-admissible (or α* -admissible) multi-valued mapping;

(S2) there exist x0and x1Tx0such that α(x0, x1) ≥ 1;

S3if {xn} is a sequence in X with xnxX as n → ∞ and α(xn, xn + 1) > 1 for all n ∈ ℕ, then we have α(xn, x) > 1 for all n ∈ ℕ.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

3 Further fixed point results

Theorem 2.2 and Theorem 2.3 generalize, extend and improve Theorems 2.5 and 2.6 of Ali et al. [6]. Also, our results improve several results, for example, Theorem 2.1 and Theorem 2.2 of Samet et al. [1], Theorem 2.3 of Asl et al. [5], Theorem 2.1 and Theorem 2.2 of Amiri et al. [17], Theorem 2.1 of Salimi et al. [18], Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.4 of Mohammadi et al. [7], Banach’s contraction principle [4], the main results of Kannan [19], the main results Chaterjea [20], Nadler’s contraction principle [3] and many others.

In this section, we give the related fixed point results which are obtained by Theorem 2.2 and Theorem 2.3 as fixed point results for mapping satisfying contractive conditions of integral type, fixed point results in ordinary metric spaces, fixed point results in metric spaces endowed with arbitrary relation and fixed point results in metric spaces endowed with graph.

3.1 Fixed point results for mapping satisfying contractive conditions of integral type

In this subsection, we prove some fixed point results for the mappings satisfying the contractive conditions of integral type by using the fixed point results related with the function ξ in Section 2.

Theorem 3.1

Let (X, d) be a complete metric space and T :XCL(X) be a multi-valued mapping. Suppose that there exist three functions ψ ∈ Φ, φ : [0, ∞) → [0, ∞) and α : X × X → [0, ∞) satisfying the following conditions:

(I nt1) φ : [0,∞) → [0,∞) is a Lebesgue integrable mapping which is summable on each compact subset of [0,∞);

(I nt2) for eachε>0,0εϕ(t)dt>0;;

(I nt3) for each a, b > 0, we have

0a+bϕ(t)dt0aϕ(t)dt+0bϕ(t)dt;

(I nt4) the following condition holds:

xX,yTxwithα(x,y)10d(y,Ty)ϕ(w)dwψ(0M(x,y)ϕ(w)dw),

whereM(x,y)=max{d(x,y),d(x,Tx),d(y,Ty),d(x,Ty)+d(y,Tx)2};

(Int5) ψ is strictly increasing function.

Further, if the following assertions hold:

(S1) T is an α-admissible multi-valued mapping;

(S2) there exist xo ϵ X and x1 ϵ T xosuch that α(x0, x1) > 1;

(S3) T is a continuous multi-valued mapping,

then T has a fixed point in X.

Proof

Define a mapping ξ : [0, ∞) → [0, ∞) by ξ(1)=0tϕ(s)ds for each t ∈ [0, ∞). From the conditions (Int1)-(Int3), we get ξ ϵ Ξ. By the definition of mapping ξ and the condition (Int4), it follows that the condition (2) holds. Since ψ is a strictly increasing function, it follows that T is a strictly weakly (α, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping. Hence the conclusion of Theorem 3.1 follows from Theorem 2.2. □

Corollary 3.2

Let (X, d) be a complete metric space and T:XCL(X) be a multi-valued mapping. Suppose that there exist three functions ψ ϵ Φ, φ : [0, ∞) → [0, ∞) and α :X χ X → [0, ∞) satisfying the following conditions:

(Int1) φ : [0, ∞) → [0, ∞) is a Lebesgue integrable mapping which is summable on each compact subset of [0, ∞);

(Int2) for eachε>0,0εϕ(t)dt>0;

(Int3) for each a, b > 0, we have

0a+bϕ(t)dt0aϕ(t)dt+0bϕ(t)dt;

(Int4) the following condition holds:

x,yXwithα(x,y)10H(Tx,Ty)ϕ(w)dwψ0M(x,y)ϕ(w)dw,

whereM(x,y)=max{d(x,y),d(x,Tx),d(y,Ty),d(x,Ty)+d(y,Tx)2};

(Int5) ψ is strictly increasing function.

Further, if the following assertions hold:

(S1) T is an α-admissible multi-valued mapping;

(S2) there exist xo ϵ X and x1 ϵ T xosuch that α(x0, x1) > 1;

(S3) T is a continuous multi-valued mapping,

then T has a fixed point in X.

Remark 3.3

Theorem 3.1 and Corollary 3.2 are still valid if we replace condition (S3) by the following condition:

  1. if {xn} is a sequence in X with xn+1 ϵ Txn, xnx ϵ X as n → 1 and α(xn, xn+1) > 1 for all n ϵ N, then we have

    0d(xn+1,Tx)ϕ(w)dwψ(0M(xn,x)ϕ(w)dw)

for all n e ℕ.

3.2 Fixed point results in ordinary metric spaces

In this subsection, we can derive some fixed point results in ordinary metric spaces from the fixed point results related with the contractive condition (2).

Theorem 3.4

Let (X, d) be a complete metric space and T :XCL(X) be a multi-valued mapping. Suppose that there exist three functions 𝜓 ϵ ѱ ξ ϵ Ξ and α X × X → [0, ∞) such that 𝜓 is strictly increasing and

(26)α(x,y)ξ(d(y,Ty))ψ(ξ(M(x,y)))

for all xX and yT x, whereM(x,y)=max{d(x,y),d(x,Tx),d(y,Ty),d(x,Ty)+d(y,Tx)2}.

Further, if the following conditions hold:

(S1) T is an α-admissible multi-valued mapping;

(S2) there exist x0and x1 ϵ T x0such that ϵ(x0; x1) ≥ 1;

(S3) T is a continuous multi-valued mapping,

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Proof

We show that T satisfies the condition (2). For any x ϵ X and y ϵ T x, assume that α(x, y) > 1. Using (26), we get

ξ(d(y,Ty))α(x,y)ξ(d(y,.Ty))ψ(ξ(M(x,y))).

This implies that the condition (2) holds. Therefore, the conclusions of this theorem follows from Theorem 2.2. □

Remark 3.5

Theorem 3.4 is still valid if we replace the contractive condition (26) by the following contractive conditions:

  1. [τ + ξ(d(y, Ty))]α(x, y) ≤ τ + ψ (ξ(M(x, y))) for all x ϵ X and y ϵ Tx, where τ > 1, or

  2. [τ + α(x, y]ξ(d(y, Ty)) ≤ τψ (ξ(M(x, y)))for all x ϵ X and y ϵ Tx, where τ > 1.

3.3 Fixed point results in metric spaces endowed with an arbitrary binary relation

In this section, we give some fixed point results on metric spaces endowed with the arbitrary binary relation which can be regarded as consequences of the results presented in the previous section.

The following notions and definitions are needed.

Let (X, d) be a metric space and ℛ be a binary relation over X. Denote

S:=1.

It is easy to see that, for all x, y ϵ X,

xSyxyoryx
Definition 3.6

Let X be a nonempty set and ℛ be a binary relation over X. A multi-valued mapping T : X → N(X) is said to be ℛ-weakly comparative if, for each x ϵ X and y ϵ Tx with x𝒮y, we have y𝒮z for all z ϵ Ty.

Definition 3.7

Let (X, d) be a metric space andbe a binary relation over X.

  1. A mapping T :XCL(X) is said to be weakly (𝒮, ψ, ξ)-contractive if there exist two functions ψ ϵ ψ and ξ ϵ Ξ such that the following condition holds:

    (27)xX,yTxwithxSyξ(d(y,Ty))ψ(ξ(M(x,y))),

    whereM(x,y)=max{d(x,y),d(x,Tx),d(y,Ty),d(x,Ty)+d(y,Tx)2}.

  2. If ψ is strictly increasing, then the the weakly (𝒮, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping is said to be strictly weakly (𝒮, ψ, ξ)-contractive.

Theorem 3.8

Let (X, d) be a complete metric space, ℛ be a binary relation over X and T : XCL(XM) be a strictly weakly (𝒮, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping satisfying the following conditions:

(S1)T is a ℛ-weakly comparative mapping;

(S2)there exist xo and xiTxo such that xo𝒮x1;

(S3)T is a continuous multi-valued mapping.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Proof

Define a mapping α :X × X → [0, ∞) by

α(x,y)={1,x,yxSy,0,otherwise.

The conclusion of Theorem 3.8 follows from Theorem 2.2. □

Using Theorem 2.3, we get the following result:

Theorem 3.9

Let (X, d) be a complete metric space, ℛ be a binary relation over X and T : XCL(X) be a strictly weakly (𝒮, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping satisfying the following conditions:

(S1)T is a-weakly comparative mapping;

(S2)there exist xo and xi ∈ Txo such that xo𝒮x1;

(S3)if {xn} is a sequence in X withxn+1 ∈ Txn, xn+1xXas n → 1 and xn + 1𝒮xn + 1for all n ∈ ℕ, then we have

ξ(d(xn+1,Tx))ψ(ξ(M(xn,x)))

for all n ∈ ℕ.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Next, we give some fixed point results on partially ordered metric spaces from Theorem 3.8 and Theorem 3.9. We need the following notions and definitions:

Definition 3.10

(X, d,⪯) is called a partially ordered metric space when (X, d) is a metric space and (X, ⪯) is a partially ordered set.

Let (X, d, ⪯) be a partially ordered metric space. Denotes ≍ : = ⪯ ∪ ⪯-1 . This implies that, for all x, yX,

xyxyoryx.
Definition 3.11

Let (X, ⪯) be a partially ordered set. A multi-valued mapping T :XN(X) is said to be ⪯ weakly comparative if, for each xX and yTx with xy, we have yz for all zTy.

Definition 3.12

Let (X, d, ⪯) be a partially ordered metric spaces.

  1. A mapping T : XCL(X) is said to be weakly (≍, ψ, ξ)-contractive if there exist two functions ψΦ and ξ ∈ Ξ such that the following condition holds:

    (28)xX,yTxwithxyξ(d(y,Ty))ψ(ξ(M(x,y))),

    whereM(x,y)=max{d(x,y),d(x,Tx),d(y,Ty),d(x,Ty)+d(y,Tx)2}

  2. If Ψ ∊ ψ is strictly increasing, then the the weakly (≍, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping is said to be strictly weakly (≍, ψ, ξ)-contractive.

It is easy to see that ⪯ is a binary relation for a partially ordered metric spaces (X, d, ⪯). Therefore, we obtain the following results from Theorem 3.8 and Theorem 3.9:

Corollary 3.13

Let (X, d, ⪯) be a complete partially ordered metric spaces and T : X → CL(X) be a strictly weakly (≍, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping satisfying the following conditions:

(S1)T is a ⪯ weakly comparative mapping;

(S2)there exist xo and x1Txo such that xo ≍ x1;

(S3)T is a continuous multi-valued mapping.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Corollary 3.14

Let (X, d, ⪯) be a complete partially ordered metric spaces and T : X → CL(X) be a strictly weakly (≍, ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping satisfying the following conditions:

(S1)T is a ⪯ weakly comparative mapping;

(S2)there exist xo and x1Txo such that xo ∈ x1;

(S3)if {xn} is a sequence in X with xn + 1 ∈ Txn, xn → x ∈ X as n → 1 and xn ≍ xn + 1 for all n ∈ ℕ, then we have

ξ(d(xn+1,Tx))ψ(ξ(M(xn,x)))

for all n ∈ ℕ.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

3.4 Fixed point results in metric spaces endowed with graph

Throughout this subsection, let (X, d) be a metric space. A set {(x, x) :xX} is called a diagonal of the Cartesian product X × X, which is denoted by Δ. Consider a graph G such that the set V(G) of its vertices coincides with X and the set E(G) of its edges contains all loops, i.e., Δ ⊆ E(G). We assume G has no parallel edges and so we can identify G with the pair (V(G), E(G)). Moreover, we may treat G as a weighted graph by assigning to each edge the distance between its vertices. In this subsection, we prove fixed point results on a metric space endowed with graph.

Before presenting our results, we give the following notions and definitions:

Definition 3.15

Let X be a nonempty set endowed with a graph G and T : X → N(X) be a multi-valued mapping, where X is a nonempty set X. A mapping T is said to have weakly preserve edge if, for each xX and yTx with (x, y)E(G), we have (y, z)E(G) for all zTy.

Definition 3.16

Let (X, d) be a metric space endowed with a graph G. A mapping T : X → CL(X) is said to be weakly (E(G), ψ, ξ)-contractive if there exist two functions ψ ∈ Φ and ξ ∈ Ξ such that the following condition holds:

(29)xX,yTxwith(x,y)E(G)ξ(d(y,Ty))ψ(ξ(M(x,y))),

whereM(x,y)=max{d(x,y),d(x,Tx),d(y,Ty),d(x,Ty)+d(y,Tx)2}.

Definition 3.17

Let (X, d) be a metric space endowed with a graph G.

  1. A mapping T : X → CL(X) is said to be (E(G), ψ, ξ) contractive if there exist two functions ψ ∈ Φ and ξ ∈ Ξ such that the following condition holds:

    (30)xX,yTxwith(x,y)E(G)ξ(H(Tx,Ty))ψ(ξ(M(x,y))),

    whereM(x,y)=max{d(x,y),d(x,Tx),d(y,Ty),d(x,Ty)+d(y,Tx)2}.

  2. If ψ ∈ Φ is strictly increasing, then the (weakly) (E(G), ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping is said to be strictly (weakly) (E(G), ψ, ξ)-contractive.

Remark 3.18

The (E(G), ψ, ξ)-contractive condition implies the weakly (E(G), ψ, ξ)-contractive condition.

Theorem 3.19

Let (X, d) be a complete metric space endowed with a graph G and T : X → CL(X) be a strictly weakly (E(G), ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping satisfying the following conditions:

(S1)T has weakly preserve edge;

(S2)there exist xo and x1 ∈ Txo such that (xo, x1) ∈ E(G);

(S3)T is a continuous multi-valued mapping.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Proof

The conclusion of this theorem can be obtain from Theorem 2.2 if we define a mapping α :X × X → [0, ∞)by

α(x,y)={1,x,y(x,y)E(G),0,otherwise.

Corollary 3.20

Let (X, d) be a complete metric space endowed with a graph G and T : X → CL(X) be a strictly (E(G), ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping satisfying the following conditions:

(S1)T has weakly preserve edge;

(S2)there exist xo and x1 ∈ Txo such that (xo, x1) ∈ E(G);

(S3)T is a continuous multi-valued mapping.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

By using Theorem 2.3, we get the following result:

Theorem 3.21

Let (X, d) be a complete metric space endowed with a graph G and T : X → CL(X) be a strictly weakly (E(G), ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping satisfying the following conditions:

(S1)T has weakly preserve edge;

(S2)there exist xo and x1 ∈ Txo such that (xo, x1) ∈ E(G);

(S3)if {xn} is a sequence in X with xn + 1Txn, xn + 1xX as n → 1 and (xn, xn + 1) ∈ E(G) for all n ∈ ℕ, then we have

ξ(d(xn,Tx))ψ(ξ(M(xn,x)))

for all n ∈ ℕ.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Corollary 3.22

Let (X, d) be a complete metric space endowed with a graph G and T : X → CL(X) be a strictly (E(G), ψ, ξ)-contractive mapping satisfying the following conditions:

(S1)T has weakly preserve edge;

(S2)there exist xo and xi ∈ Txo such that (xo, xi) ∈ E(G);

(S3)if {xn is a sequence in X with xn+xX as n → 1 and (xn, xn + 1) ∈ E(G) for all n ∈ ℕ, then we have (xn, x) ∈ E(G) for all n ∈ ℕ.

Then T has a fixed point in X.

Acknowledgement

This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under Grant No. G-1436-130-198. The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks DSR technical and financial support.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

1 Samet, B., Vetro, C., Vetro, P., Fixed-point theorems for α-ψ-contractive type mappings, Nonlinear Anal., 2012, 75, 2154–2165.10.1016/j.na.2011.10.014Suche in Google Scholar

2 von Neumann, J., Zur theorie der gesellschaftsspiele, Math. Annal., 1928, 100, 295–320.10.1007/BF01448847Suche in Google Scholar

3 Nadler, S.B., Multi-valued contraction mappings, Pacific J. Math., 1969, 30, 475–488.10.2140/pjm.1969.30.475Suche in Google Scholar

4 Banach, S., Sur les opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leurs applications aux équations intégrales, Fund. Math., 1922, 3, 133–181.10.4064/fm-3-1-133-181Suche in Google Scholar

5 Asl, J.H., Rezapour, S., Shahzad, N., On Fixed points of α-ψ-contractive multifunctions, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2012, Vol. 2012, 212.10.1186/1687-1812-2012-212Suche in Google Scholar

6 Ali, M.U., Kamran, T., Karapinar, E., (α,ψ,ξ)-contractive multi-valued mappings, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2014, 2014:7.10.1186/1687-1812-2013-137Suche in Google Scholar

7 B. Mohammadi, S. Rezapour and N. Shahzad, Some results on Fixed points of α-ψ-Ciric generalized multifunctions, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2013, 2013:2410.1186/1687-1812-2013-24Suche in Google Scholar

8 Ali, M.U., Kamran, T., Karapinar, E., A new approach to (α,ψ)-contractive nonself multivalued mappings, J. Inequal. Appl., 2014, 2014:71.10.1186/1029-242X-2014-71Suche in Google Scholar

9 Ali, M.U., Kiran, Q., Shahzad, N., Fixed point theorems for multi-valued mappings involving α-function, Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2014, Vol. 2014, Article ID 409467, 6 pages.10.1155/2014/409467Suche in Google Scholar

10 Ali, M.U., Kamran, T., Shahzad, N., Best proximity point for α-ψ-proximal contractive multimaps, Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2014, Vol. 2014, Article ID 181598, 6 pages.10.1155/2014/181598Suche in Google Scholar

11 Ali, M.U., Kamran, T., Karapinar, E., An approach to existence of Fixed points of generalized contractive multivalued mappings of integral type via admissible mapping, Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2014, Vol. 2014, Article ID 141489, 7 pages.10.1155/2014/141489Suche in Google Scholar

12 Ali, M.U., Kamran, T., Karapinar, E., Fixed point of α-ψ-contractive type mappings in uniform spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2014, 2014:150.10.1186/1687-1812-2014-150Suche in Google Scholar

13 Kutbi, M.A., Sintunavarat, W., Ulam-Hyers stability and well-posedness of Fixed point problems for α-λ-contraction mapping in metric spaces, Abstr. Appl. Anal., Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 268230, 6 pages.10.1155/2014/268230Suche in Google Scholar

14 Kutbi, M.A., Sintunavarat, W., Fixed point theorems for generalized wα-contraction multivalued mappings in α-complete metric spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2014, 2014:139.10.1186/1687-1812-2014-139Suche in Google Scholar

15 Kutbi, M.A., Sintunavarat, W., Fixed point analysis for multi-valued operators with graph approach by the generalized Hausdorff distance, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2014, 2014:142.10.1186/1687-1812-2014-142Suche in Google Scholar

16 Kutbi, M.A., Sintunavarat, W., On new Fixed point results for (α,ψ,ξ)-contractive multi-valued mappings on α-complete metric spaces and their consequences, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2015, 2015:2.10.1186/1687-1812-2015-2Suche in Google Scholar

17 Amiri, P., Rezapour, S., Shahzad, N., Fixed points of generalized α-ψ-contractions, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat. Ser. A Mat., 2014, 108, 519–526.10.1007/s13398-013-0123-9Suche in Google Scholar

18 Salimi, P., Latif, A., Hussain, N., Modified α-ψ-contractive mappings with applications, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2013, 2013:151.10.1186/1687-1812-2013-151Suche in Google Scholar

19 Kannan, R., Some results on Fixed points II, Amer. Math. Monthly, 1969, 76, 405–408.10.1080/00029890.1969.12000228Suche in Google Scholar

20 Chatterjea, S.K., Fixed point theorems, C. R. Acad. Bulgare Sci., 1972, 25, 727–730.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-6-15
Accepted: 2016-1-15
Published Online: 2016-3-29
Published in Print: 2016-1-1

© Kutbi and Sintunavarat

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Regular Article
  2. A metric graph satisfying w41=1 that cannot be lifted to a curve satisfying dim(W41)=1
  3. Regular Article
  4. On the Riemann-Hilbert problem in multiply connected domains
  5. Regular Article
  6. Hamilton cycles in almost distance-hereditary graphs
  7. Regular Article
  8. Locally adequate semigroup algebras
  9. Regular Article
  10. Parabolic oblique derivative problem with discontinuous coefficients in generalized weighted Morrey spaces
  11. Corrigendum
  12. Corrigendum to: parabolic oblique derivative problem with discontinuous coefficients in generalized weighted Morrey spaces
  13. Regular Article
  14. Some new bounds of the minimum eigenvalue for the Hadamard product of an M-matrix and an inverse M-matrix
  15. Regular Article
  16. Integral inequalities involving generalized Erdélyi-Kober fractional integral operators
  17. Regular Article
  18. Results on the deficiencies of some differential-difference polynomials of meromorphic functions
  19. Regular Article
  20. General numerical radius inequalities for matrices of operators
  21. Regular Article
  22. The best uniform quadratic approximation of circular arcs with high accuracy
  23. Regular Article
  24. Multiple gcd-closed sets and determinants of matrices associated with arithmetic functions
  25. Regular Article
  26. A note on the rate of convergence for Chebyshev-Lobatto and Radau systems
  27. Regular Article
  28. On the weakly(α, ψ, ξ)-contractive condition for multi-valued operators in metric spaces and related fixed point results
  29. Regular Article
  30. Existence of a common solution for a system of nonlinear integral equations via fixed point methods in b-metric spaces
  31. Regular Article
  32. Bounds for the Z-eigenpair of general nonnegative tensors
  33. Regular Article
  34. Subsymmetry and asymmetry models for multiway square contingency tables with ordered categories
  35. Regular Article
  36. End-regular and End-orthodox generalized lexicographic products of bipartite graphs
  37. Regular Article
  38. Refinement of the Jensen integral inequality
  39. Regular Article
  40. New iterative codes for 𝓗-tensors and an application
  41. Regular Article
  42. A result for O2-convergence to be topological in posets
  43. Regular Article
  44. A fixed point approach to the Mittag-Leffler-Hyers-Ulam stability of a fractional integral equation
  45. Regular Article
  46. Uncertainty orders on the sublinear expectation space
  47. Regular Article
  48. Generalized derivations of Lie triple systems
  49. Regular Article
  50. The BV solution of the parabolic equation with degeneracy on the boundary
  51. Regular Article
  52. Malliavin method for optimal investment in financial markets with memory
  53. Regular Article
  54. Parabolic sublinear operators with rough kernel generated by parabolic calderön-zygmund operators and parabolic local campanato space estimates for their commutators on the parabolic generalized local morrey spaces
  55. Regular Article
  56. On annihilators in BL-algebras
  57. Regular Article
  58. On derivations of quantales
  59. Regular Article
  60. On the closed subfields of Q¯~p
  61. Regular Article
  62. A class of tridiagonal operators associated to some subshifts
  63. Regular Article
  64. Some notes to existence and stability of the positive periodic solutions for a delayed nonlinear differential equations
  65. Regular Article
  66. Weighted fractional differential equations with infinite delay in Banach spaces
  67. Regular Article
  68. Laplace-Stieltjes transform of the system mean lifetime via geometric process model
  69. Regular Article
  70. Various limit theorems for ratios from the uniform distribution
  71. Regular Article
  72. On α-almost Artinian modules
  73. Regular Article
  74. Limit theorems for the weights and the degrees in anN-interactions random graph model
  75. Regular Article
  76. An analysis on the stability of a state dependent delay differential equation
  77. Regular Article
  78. The hybrid mean value of Dedekind sums and two-term exponential sums
  79. Regular Article
  80. New modification of Maheshwari’s method with optimal eighth order convergence for solving nonlinear equations
  81. Regular Article
  82. On the concept of general solution for impulsive differential equations of fractional-order q ∈ (2,3)
  83. Regular Article
  84. A Riesz representation theory for completely regular Hausdorff spaces and its applications
  85. Regular Article
  86. Oscillation of impulsive conformable fractional differential equations
  87. Regular Article
  88. Dynamics of doubly stochastic quadratic operators on a finite-dimensional simplex
  89. Regular Article
  90. Homoclinic solutions of 2nth-order difference equations containing both advance and retardation
  91. Regular Article
  92. When do L-fuzzy ideals of a ring generate a distributive lattice?
  93. Regular Article
  94. Fully degenerate poly-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials
  95. Commentary
  96. Commentary to: Generalized derivations of Lie triple systems
  97. Regular Article
  98. Simple sufficient conditions for starlikeness and convexity for meromorphic functions
  99. Regular Article
  100. Global stability analysis and control of leptospirosis
  101. Regular Article
  102. Random attractors for stochastic two-compartment Gray-Scott equations with a multiplicative noise
  103. Regular Article
  104. The fuzzy metric space based on fuzzy measure
  105. Regular Article
  106. A classification of low dimensional multiplicative Hom-Lie superalgebras
  107. Regular Article
  108. Structures of W(2.2) Lie conformal algebra
  109. Regular Article
  110. On the number of spanning trees, the Laplacian eigenvalues, and the Laplacian Estrada index of subdivided-line graphs
  111. Regular Article
  112. Parabolic Marcinkiewicz integrals on product spaces and extrapolation
  113. Regular Article
  114. Prime, weakly prime and almost prime elements in multiplication lattice modules
  115. Regular Article
  116. Pochhammer symbol with negative indices. A new rule for the method of brackets
  117. Regular Article
  118. Outcome space range reduction method for global optimization of sum of affine ratios problem
  119. Regular Article
  120. Factorization theorems for strong maps between matroids of arbitrary cardinality
  121. Regular Article
  122. A convergence analysis of SOR iterative methods for linear systems with weak H-matrices
  123. Regular Article
  124. Existence theory for sequential fractional differential equations with anti-periodic type boundary conditions
  125. Regular Article
  126. Some congruences for 3-component multipartitions
  127. Regular Article
  128. Bound for the largest singular value of nonnegative rectangular tensors
  129. Regular Article
  130. Convolutions of harmonic right half-plane mappings
  131. Regular Article
  132. On homological classification of pomonoids by GP-po-flatness of S-posets
  133. Regular Article
  134. On CSQ-normal subgroups of finite groups
  135. Regular Article
  136. The homogeneous balance of undetermined coefficients method and its application
  137. Regular Article
  138. On the saturated numerical semigroups
  139. Regular Article
  140. The Bruhat rank of a binary symmetric staircase pattern
  141. Regular Article
  142. Fixed point theorems for cyclic contractive mappings via altering distance functions in metric-like spaces
  143. Regular Article
  144. Singularities of lightcone pedals of spacelike curves in Lorentz-Minkowski 3-space
  145. Regular Article
  146. An S-type upper bound for the largest singular value of nonnegative rectangular tensors
  147. Regular Article
  148. Fuzzy ideals of ordered semigroups with fuzzy orderings
  149. Regular Article
  150. On meromorphic functions for sharing two sets and three sets in m-punctured complex plane
  151. Regular Article
  152. An incremental approach to obtaining attribute reduction for dynamic decision systems
  153. Regular Article
  154. Very true operators on MTL-algebras
  155. Regular Article
  156. Value distribution of meromorphic solutions of homogeneous and non-homogeneous complex linear differential-difference equations
  157. Regular Article
  158. A class of 3-dimensional almost Kenmotsu manifolds with harmonic curvature tensors
  159. Regular Article
  160. Robust dynamic output feedback fault-tolerant control for Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems with interval time-varying delay via improved delay partitioning approach
  161. Regular Article
  162. New bounds for the minimum eigenvalue of M-matrices
  163. Regular Article
  164. Semi-quotient mappings and spaces
  165. Regular Article
  166. Fractional multilinear integrals with rough kernels on generalized weighted Morrey spaces
  167. Regular Article
  168. A family of singular functions and its relation to harmonic fractal analysis and fuzzy logic
  169. Regular Article
  170. Solution to Fredholm integral inclusions via (F, δb)-contractions
  171. Regular Article
  172. An Ulam stability result on quasi-b-metric-like spaces
  173. Regular Article
  174. On the arrowhead-Fibonacci numbers
  175. Regular Article
  176. Rough semigroups and rough fuzzy semigroups based on fuzzy ideals
  177. Regular Article
  178. The general solution of impulsive systems with Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives
  179. Regular Article
  180. A remark on local fractional calculus and ordinary derivatives
  181. Regular Article
  182. Elastic Sturmian spirals in the Lorentz-Minkowski plane
  183. Topical Issue: Metaheuristics: Methods and Applications
  184. Bias-variance decomposition in Genetic Programming
  185. Topical Issue: Metaheuristics: Methods and Applications
  186. A novel generalized oppositional biogeography-based optimization algorithm: application to peak to average power ratio reduction in OFDM systems
  187. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  188. Modeling of vibration for functionally graded beams
  189. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  190. Decomposition of a second-order linear time-varying differential system as the series connection of two first order commutative pairs
  191. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  192. Differential equations associated with generalized Bell polynomials and their zeros
  193. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  194. Differential equations for p, q-Touchard polynomials
  195. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  196. A new approach to nonlinear singular integral operators depending on three parameters
  197. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  198. Performance and stochastic stability of the adaptive fading extended Kalman filter with the matrix forgetting factor
  199. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  200. On new characterization of inextensible flows of space-like curves in de Sitter space
  201. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  202. Convergence theorems for a family of multivalued nonexpansive mappings in hyperbolic spaces
  203. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  204. Fractional virus epidemic model on financial networks
  205. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  206. Reductions and conservation laws for BBM and modified BBM equations
  207. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  208. Extinction of a two species non-autonomous competitive system with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response and the effect of toxic substances
Heruntergeladen am 9.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2016-0013/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen