In my professor’s eyes: Faculty and perceived impoliteness in student emails

Iftikhar Haider; Hamed Zandi

doi:10.1515/lpp-2022-0009

Artikel

In my professor’s eyes: Faculty and perceived impoliteness in student emails

Iftikhar Haider
Iftikhar Haider is an instructional Assistant Professor at Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois. He holds a Ph.D. in Applied Linguistics from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His areas of interest are ESL writing, language assessment, second language pragmatics, and computer-mediated communication.
und Hamed Zandi
Hamed Zandi is an assistant professor at the Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS), Zanjan, Iran. He holds a Ph.D. in Applied Linguistics with a focus on Teaching English as a Foreign Language from the University of Tehran. He is interested in the validity of teaching practices from the perspective of English as an International Language.

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 20. Oktober 2022

Veröffentlicht von

Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Manuskript einreichen Informationen für Autor*innen Erkunden Sie dieses Fachgebiet

Aus der Zeitschrift Lodz Papers in Pragmatics Band 18 Heft 1

Abstract

Impoliteness in student emails to faculty can have negative consequences. However, the nuances of perceived impoliteness by faculty with different language backgrounds have not been thoroughly studied in the literature. This paper explores how emails written by non-native English-speaking students are perceived impolite by faculty depending on social identity variables such as native speaker status, gender, and seniority. Participants (n = 152 faculty) read six emails and rated their perceptions of the emails on a questionnaire. The items on the questionnaire were about lack of face enhancement, use of face threat, acknowledgment of imposition, and not giving a choice in complying with requests. Results suggest that in their perceptions of the lack of face enhancement, senior faculty seemed to be more tolerant than their junior counterparts. Further, non-native speakers of English were found to be more tolerant of the lack of acknowledgment of imposition. However, no significant association was observed between the social identity of the faculty and their perception of face threat nor between social identity and giving a choice in complying with requests. The paper has implications for raising the awareness of the faculty and students about their potential biases in academic correspondence.

Keywords: email communication; impoliteness; perception; native speaker; gender; senior faculty

Language Teaching Group, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS) 444 Prof. Yousef Sobouti Blvd., Zanjan 45137-66731, Iran

About the authors

Iftikhar Haider

Iftikhar Haider is an instructional Assistant Professor at Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois. He holds a Ph.D. in Applied Linguistics from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His areas of interest are ESL writing, language assessment, second language pragmatics, and computer-mediated communication.

Hamed Zandi

Hamed Zandi is an assistant professor at the Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS), Zanjan, Iran. He holds a Ph.D. in Applied Linguistics with a focus on Teaching English as a Foreign Language from the University of Tehran. He is interested in the validity of teaching practices from the perspective of English as an International Language.

References

Alcón-Soler, Eva. 2015. Pragmatic learning and study abroad: Effects of instruction and length of stay. System 48.62–74.10.1016/j.system.2014.09.005Suche in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 2013. Developing L2 Pragmatics. Language Learning 63 (SUPPL. 1). 68–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00738.x.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00738.xSuche in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen & Beverly S. Hartford. 2005. Introduction. In Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig & Beverly S. Hartford (eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics: Exploring institutional talk, 1–6. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781410613776Suche in Google Scholar

Barón, Julia & Mireia Ortega. 2018. Investigating age differences in e-mail pragmatic performance. System 78.148–158.10.1016/j.system.2018.08.001Suche in Google Scholar

Baron, Naomi S. 2003. Why e-mail looks like speech: Proofreading pedagogy and public face. In Jean Atchison & Diana Lewis (eds.), New Media Language, 85–94. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Bayard, Donn, Ann Weatherall, Cynthia Gallois & Jeffery Pittam. 2001. Pax Americana? Accent attitudinal evaluations in New Zealand, Australia and America. Journal of sociolinguistics 5(1). 22–49.10.1111/1467-9481.00136Suche in Google Scholar

Bella, Spyridoula. 2011. Mitigation and politeness in Greek invitation refusals: Effects of length of residence in the target community and intensity of interaction on non-native speakers’ performance. Journal of pragmatics 43(6). 1718–1740.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.005Suche in Google Scholar

Beltrán, Elina V. 2014. Length of stay abroad: Effects of time on the speech act of requesting. International Journal of English Studies 14(1). 79–96.10.6018/ijes/14/1/155211Suche in Google Scholar

Biesenbach-Lucas, Sigrun. 2006. Making requests in e-mail: do cyber consultation entail directness? Toward conventions in a new medium. Pragmatics and Language Learning 11.81–107.Suche in Google Scholar

Biesenbach-Lucas, Sigrun. 2007. Students writing e-mails to faculty: an examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning and Technology 11(2). 59–81.Suche in Google Scholar

Blitvich, Pilar G. C. 2010. A genre approach to the study of im-politeness. International Review of Pragmatics 2(1). 46–94.10.1163/187731010X491747Suche in Google Scholar

Blitvich, Pilar G. C. 2013. Introduction: Face, identity and im/politeness. Looking backward, moving forward: From Goffman to practice theory. Journal of Politeness Research 9(1). 1–33.10.1515/pr-2013-0001Suche in Google Scholar

Blitvich, Pilar G. C., & Maria Sifianou. 2019. Im/politeness and discursive pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 145. 91–101.10.1016/j.pragma.2019.03.015Suche in Google Scholar

Blitvich, Pilar G. C., Patrizia Bou-Franch, P. & Nuria Lorenzo-Dus. 2013. Identity and impoliteness: The expert in the talent show Idol. Journal of Politeness Research 9(1). 97– 121.10.1515/pr-2013-0005Suche in Google Scholar

Bloch, Joel. 2002. Student/teacher interaction via e-mail: the social context of internet discourse. Journal of Second Language Writing 11(2). 117–134.10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00064-4Suche in Google Scholar

Block, David & Victoria Corona. 2016. Intersectionality in Language and Identity Research. In Sian Preece (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Identity, 533–548). London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315669816-46Suche in Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House & Gabriele Kasper. 1989. Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Grazer Linguistische Studien, (Heft), 349–357.Suche in Google Scholar

Bolkan, San & Jennifer L. Holmgren. 2012. “You are such a great teacher and I hate to bother you but…”: Instructors' perceptions of students and their use of email messages with varying politeness strategies. Communication Education 61(3). 253–270.10.1080/03634523.2012.667135Suche in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503621749Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope. 1980. How and why are women more polite: Some evidence from a Mayan community. In Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker & Nelly Furman (eds.), Women and language in literature and society, 111–136. New York: Praeger.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelpe & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Chai-Fen E. 2006. The development of e-mail literacy: From writing to peers to writing to authority figures. Language Learning & Technology 10(2). 35–55.Suche in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2010. Conventionalised impoliteness formulae. Journal of pragmatics 42(12). 3232–3245.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007Suche in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence (Vol. 28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752Suche in Google Scholar

Dürscheid, Christa & Carmen Frehner. 2013. Email Communication. In Susan Herring, Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds.), Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, 36–54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214468.35Suche in Google Scholar

Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria. 2005. ‘Yes, tell me please, what time is the midday flight from Athens arriving?.’: telephone service encounters and politeness. Intercultural Pragmatics 2(3). 253–273.10.1515/iprg.2005.2.3.253Suche in Google Scholar

Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria. 2011. Please answer me as soon as possible: Pragmatic failure in non-native speakers’ e-mail requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics 43(13). 3193–3215.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.006Suche in Google Scholar

Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria. 2016. Variation in evaluations of impoliteness of emails from L2 learners and perceptions of the personality of their senders. Journal of Pragmatics 106. 1–19.10.1016/j.pragma.2016.10.001Suche in Google Scholar

Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria. 2018. Mr Paul, please inform me accordingly: Address forms, directness and degree of imposition in L2 emails. Pragmatics 28(4). 489–516.10.1075/prag.17025.ecoSuche in Google Scholar

Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria, Helen Woodfield & Christine Savvidou. 2021. Non-native EFL teachers’ email production and perceptions of e-(im) politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 17(2). 155–178.10.1515/pr-2020-0046Suche in Google Scholar

Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Eslami, Zohreh R. 2013. Online communication and students’ pragmatic choices in English. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 9(1). 71–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2013-0005.10.1515/lpp-2013-0005Suche in Google Scholar

Félix-Brasdefer, J. César. 2012a. E-mail requests to faculty: E-politeness and internal modification. In Maria Economidou-Kogetsidis & Helen Woodfield (eds.), Interlanguage Request Modification, 87–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.217.04felSuche in Google Scholar

Félix-Brasdefer, J. César. 2012b. Email openings and closings: pragmalinguistic and gender variation in learner-instructor cyber consultations. In Eva Alcón Soler & Maria-Pilar Safont-Jordà (eds.), Discourse and language learning across L2 instructional settings, 223–248. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401208598_012Suche in Google Scholar

Field, Andy, Jeremy Miles & Zoe Field. 2012. Discovering statistics using R. London: Sage publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan, (eds.), Speech acts. 41–58. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Suche in Google Scholar

Hartford, Beverly S. & Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig. 1996. At your earliest convenience: Written student requests to faculty. In Lawrence F. Bouton (ed.), Pragmatics and Language Learning, Vol(7), 55–69. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign: Division of English as an International Language.Suche in Google Scholar

Hendriks, Berna. 2010. An experimental study of native speaker perceptions of non-native request modification in emails in English. Intercultural Pragmatics 7(2). 221–255.10.1515/iprg.2010.011Suche in Google Scholar

Hill, Thomas. 1997. The development of pragmatic competence in an EFL context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Japan.Suche in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet. 1995. Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Ide, Sachiko. 1982. Japanese Sociolinguistics: Politeness and Women’s Language. Lingua 57. 357–385.10.1016/0024-3841(82)90009-2Suche in Google Scholar

Joseph, John. 2004. Language and Identity: National, Ethnic, Religious. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230503427Suche in Google Scholar

Kaiser, Henry F. 1974. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39. 31–36.10.1007/BF02291575Suche in Google Scholar

Kasper, Gabriele & Kenneth Rose 2003. Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Kecskes, Istvan. 2012. Sociopragmatics and cross-cultural and intercultural studies. In Michael Spivey, Marc Joanisse & Ken McRae (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 516–599. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139029377.10.1017/CBO9781139029377Suche in Google Scholar

Kienpointner, Manfred & Maria Stopfner. 2017. Ideology and impoliteness. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh & Daniel Z. Kádár (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic impoliteness, 61–87. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_4Suche in Google Scholar

Kline, Paul. 1999. The handbook of psychological testing (2^nd ed.). London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.Suche in Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Marti Anderson. 2013. Techniques and principles in language teaching (3^rd edn.). New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. 2014. The pragmatics of politeness. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Linguistic Politeness Research Group (eds.). 2011. Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110238679Suche in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam A. 2008. Relational Work, Politeness and Identity Construction. In Gerd Antos, Eija Ventola & Tilo Weber (eds.), Handbooks of Applied Linguistics. Issue 2: Interpersonal Communication, 509–540. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110211399.4.509Suche in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam A. & Richard J. Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1. 9–33.10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9Suche in Google Scholar

Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615238Suche in Google Scholar

Myres, James. 2017. Acceptability judgment. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Available at http://linguistics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrfore/9780199384655.001.0001/acre-fore-9780199384655-e-333 (accessed 22/05/2020).10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.333Suche in Google Scholar

Nguyen, Thi Thuy Minh. 2018. Pragmatic development in the instructed context: A longitudinal investigation of L2 email requests. Pragmatics 28(2). 217–252.10.1075/prag.00007.nguSuche in Google Scholar

Norman, Warren. 1963. Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factor 54 structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 66. 574–583.10.1037/h0040291Suche in Google Scholar

Noveck, Ira & Dan Sperber. 2007. The why and how of experimental pragmatics: The case of scalar inferences. In Deirdre Wilson & Dan Sperber (eds.), Meaning and Relevance, 307–330. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.018.10.1017/CBO9781139028370.018Suche in Google Scholar

Pan, Ping. 2012. Making Requests in Institutional E-mail Communication in Hong Kong: An interlanguage and intercultural pragmatics approach. Dissertation. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.10.1075/pbns.217.05catSuche in Google Scholar

Panteli, Niki & Monica Seeley. 2006. The email gender gap. In Mary Barrett & Marilyn J. Davidson (eds.), Gender and communication at work, 250–259. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Suche in Google Scholar

Richards, Jack C. & Theodore Rodgers. 2014. Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009024532Suche in Google Scholar

Roever, Carsten. 2006. Validation of a web-based test of ESL pragmalinguistics. Language Testing 23(2). 229–256.10.1191/0265532206lt329oaSuche in Google Scholar

Savić, Milica. 2018. Lecturer perceptions of im/politeness and in/appropriateness in student e-mail requests: A Norwegian perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 124. 52–72.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.12.005Suche in Google Scholar

Savić, Мilica. 2019. Relational practices in Norwegian students’ e-mail requests in English: A focus on openings and closings. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 49. Available at: https://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr49/savic.html (accessed 03/07/2021).Suche in Google Scholar

Savvidou, Christine & Maria Economidou-Kogetsidis. 2019. Teaching pragmatics: Nonnative-speaker teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and reported practices. Intercultural Communication Education 2(1). 39–58.10.29140/ice.v2n1.124Suche in Google Scholar

Graham, Sage & Claire Hardaker. 2017. (Im)politeness in digital communication. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh & Daniel Kadar (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, 785–814. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_30Suche in Google Scholar

Siu, Fiona Kwai Peng. 2008. Exploring the pragmatic competence of EFL learners in the production and judgment of formal written requests. Unpublished doctoral Dissertation in Applied Linguistics at Macquarie University, Australia. (ERIC number: ED505570).Suche in Google Scholar

Sonnenburg-Winkler, Sunni L., Zohreh R. Eslami & Ali Derakhshan. 2020. Rater variation in pragmatic assessment: The impact of the linguistic background on peer-assessment and self-assessment. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 16(1). 67–85.10.1515/lpp-2020-0004Suche in Google Scholar

Stephens, Keri K., Marian L. Houser & Renee L. Cowan. 2009. RU able to meat me: The impact of students’ overly casual email messages to instructors. Communication Education 58(3). 303–326.10.1080/03634520802582598Suche in Google Scholar

Taguchi, Naoko. 2005. Comprehending implied meaning in English as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal 89. 543–562.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00329.xSuche in Google Scholar

Taguchi, Naoko. 2014. Pragmatic socialization in an English-medium university in Japan. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 52. 157-181.10.1515/iral-2014-0007Suche in Google Scholar

Terkourafi, Marina. 2008.. Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness and rudeness. In Derek Bousfield & Miriam Locher (eds.), Im-politeness in Language. Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, 45–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter10.1515/9783110208344.1.45Suche in Google Scholar

Terkourafi, Marina. 2019. Im/politeness: A 21st Century Appraisal. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching 1(6). 1–17.Suche in Google Scholar

Thomas, Jenny. 1983. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics 4. 91–112.10.1093/applin/4.2.91Suche in Google Scholar

Thomas-Tate, Shurita, Timothy K. Daugherty & Timothy J. Bartkoski. 2017. Experimental study of gender effects on language use in college students’ email to faculty. College Student Journal 51(2). 222–226.Suche in Google Scholar

Trosborg, Aanna. 1995. Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints and apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110885286Suche in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds.). 1992/2008. Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110886542Suche in Google Scholar

Woodfield, Helen & Maria Economidou-Kogetsidis. 2010. ‘I just need more time’: A study of native and non-native students’ requests to faculty for an extension. Multilingua 29(1). 77–118.10.1515/mult.2010.004Suche in Google Scholar

Zhu, Wuhan. 2012. Polite requestive strategies in emails: An investigation of pragmatic competence of Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal 43(2). 217–238.10.1177/0033688212449936Suche in Google Scholar

Appendix 1

Perception questionnaire emails adopted and adapted from Economidou-Kogetsidis (2011: 3193–3215).

Email 1

Dear [First name],

Please e-mail the syllabus of the course ESL 501 taught during the second semester because I would like to familiarize myself with the content of its books.

Email 2

Subject: questionnaire ATTACHMENT

Please note what changes should be made.

Email 3

Subject:

hello..

My name is …..and I missed today’s lecture because I’m sick. . I would like to know about assignment

Email 4

Subject:

[First Name].

I collected some "chunks" about professional identity from the chapters that I read. I'm going to use them in my literature review that I will write tomorrow. Please take a look and see whether what I collected are necessary and important but also whether my references are ok...Shall I include a quotation as it is or shall I paraphrase? Please answer me as soon as possible.

Thanks

Email 5

Dr. [first name]

When can I come to your office to speak to you about a problem that I have? Thanks

Email 6

Subject: My assignment

Dr. [first name],

Please let me know if you received my assignment.

Published Online: 2022-10-20

Published in Print: 2022-05-25

Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.

Artikel in diesem Heft

https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2022-0009

Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel

email communication; impoliteness; perception; native speaker; gender; senior faculty