Grammaticalization of subject agreement on evidence from Italo–Romance

References

Abbott, Barbara. 1992. Definiteness, existentials, and the “list” Interpretation. In Chris Barker & David Dowty (eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory II, 1–16. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.10.3765/salt.v2i0.3028Suche in Google Scholar

Abbott, Barbara. 1993. A pragmatic account of the definiteness effect in existential sentences. Journal of Pragmatics 19. 39–55.10.1016/0378-2166(93)90069-2Suche in Google Scholar

Beavers, John. 2011. On affectedness. Natural Language & Linguistics Theory 29. 335–370.10.1007/s11049-011-9124-6Suche in Google Scholar

Benincà, Paola. 1983. II clitico “a” nel dialetto padovano. In Paola Benincà, Manlio Cortelazzo, Aldo Prosdocimi, Laura Vanelli & Alberto Zamboni (eds.), Scritti linguistici in onore di Giovan Battista Pellegrini, 25–32. Pisa: Pacini.Suche in Google Scholar

Benincà, Paola. 1988. L’ordine degli elementi della frase. Costruzioni con ordine marcato degli elementi. In Lorenzo Renzi (ed.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione: Volume 1: La frase: I sintagmi nominale e preposizionale, 129–194. Bologna: il Mulino.Suche in Google Scholar

Benincà, Paola. 1994a. Tipologia dei pronomi soggetto nelle lingue romanze. In Paola Benincà (ed.), La variazione sintattica: Studi di dialettologia romanza, 195–211. Bologna: il Mulino.Suche in Google Scholar

Benincà, Paola. 1994b. Punti di sintassi comparata dei dialetti italiani settentrionali. In Paola Benincà (ed.), La variazione sintattica: Studi di dialettologia romanza, 105–138. Bologna: il Mulino.Suche in Google Scholar

Benincà, Paola. 2001. The Position of topic and focus in the left periphery. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 39–64. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1163/9780585473949_005Suche in Google Scholar

Benincà, Paola. 2007. Clitici e ausiliari: gh ò, z é. In Delia Bentley & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), Sui dialetti italo–romanzi: Saggi in onore di Nigel B. Vincent (Special supplement number 1 to The Italianist 27), 27–47. King’s Lynn, Norfolk: Biddles Ltd.Suche in Google Scholar

Bentley, Delia. 2006. Split intransitivity in Italian. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110896053Suche in Google Scholar

Bentley, Delia. 2013. Subject canonicality and definiteness effects in Romance there sentences. Language 89(4). 675–712.10.1353/lan.2013.0062Suche in Google Scholar

Bentley, Delia. 2015a. Existentials and locatives in Romance dialects of Italy: Introduction. In Delia Bentley, Francesco M. Ciconte & Silvio Cruschina (eds.), Existentials and locatives in Romance dialects of Italy, 1–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745266.003.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Bentley, Delia. 2015b. Predication and argument realization. In Delia Bentley, Francesco M. Ciconte & Silvio Cruschina (eds.), Existentials and locatives in Romance dialects of Italy, 99–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745266.003.0003Suche in Google Scholar

Bentley, Delia, Francesco M. Ciconte & Silvio Cruschina. 2015. Existentials and locatives in Romance dialects of Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745266.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Bentley, Delia & Cruschina, Silvio. 2016. Existential Constructions. In Susann Fischer and Christoph Gabriel (eds), Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance, 487–516. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110311860-019Suche in Google Scholar

Bentley, Delia & Þórhallur Eyþórsson. 2003. Auxiliary selection and the semantics of unaccusativity. Lingua 114. 447–471.10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00068-8Suche in Google Scholar

Benveniste, Émile. 1966. Problémes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernini, Giuliano. 2012. Il clitico a nell’italo–romanzo settentrionale: osservazioni metodologiche. In Vincenzo Orioles (ed.), Per Roberto Gusmani: Linguistica storica e teorica. Studi in ricordo, 269–282. Udine: Forum.Suche in Google Scholar

Brandi, Luciana & Patrizia Cordin. 1989. Two Italian dialects and the null subject parameter. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, 111–142. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_4Suche in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan & Sam A. Mchombo. 1987. Topic, pronoun and agreement in Chichewa. Language 63. 741–782.10.2307/415717Suche in Google Scholar

Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax: A government–binding approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7Suche in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna & Lori Repetti. 2010. Proclitic vs enclitic pronouns in northern Italian dialects and the null–subject parameter. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds.), Syntactic variation: The dialects of Italy, 119–134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Carlson, Gregory. 1977. A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy 1. 413–456.10.1007/BF00353456Suche in Google Scholar

Cennamo, Michela. 1999. Late Latin pleonastic reflexives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Transactions of the Philological Society 97. 103–150.10.1111/1467-968X.00046Suche in Google Scholar

Centineo, Giulia. 1986. A lexical teory of auxiliary selection in Italian. Davis Working Papers in Linguistics 1. 1–35.Suche in Google Scholar

Ciconte, Francesco M. 2010. Existential constructions in the early Italo–Romance vernaculars. Manchester: The University of Manchester dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Ciconte, Francesco M. 2015. Historical context. In Delia Bentley, Francesco M. Ciconte & Silvio Cruschina (eds.), Existentials and locatives in Romance dialects of Italy, 217–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745266.003.0005Suche in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville. 2003. Agreement: The range of the phenomenon and the principles of the Surrey database of agreement. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2). 155–202.10.1111/1467-968X.00117Suche in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Cornilescu, Alexandra. 2009. Restructuring strategies of the Romanian verb fi ‘be’ and the analysis of existential sentences. In Georg A. Kaiser & Eva–Maria Remberger (eds.), Null subjects, expletives and locatives in Romance (Konstanzer Arbeitspapiere des Fachbereichs Sprachwissenschaft 123), 199–230. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.Suche in Google Scholar

Corr, Alice. 2016. Wide–focus subject–verb inversion in Ibero-Romance: A locative account. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics 1(1): 11. 1–33.10.5334/gjgl.85Suche in Google Scholar

Cruschina, Silvio. 2012. Focus in existential sentences. In Valentina Bianchi & Cristiano Chesi (eds.), Enjoy linguistics! Papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 60th Birthday, 77–107. Siena: CISCL Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Cruschina, Silvio. 2015. Focus structure. In Delia Bentley, Francesco M. Ciconte & Silvio Cruschina (eds.), Existentials and locatives in Romance dialects of Italy, 43–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745266.003.0002Suche in Google Scholar

Diedrichsen, Elke. 2013. Auxiliary selection in German: Constructional gradience with perfect formation. In Elly van Gelderen, Michela Cennamo & Jóhanna Barðdal (eds.), Argument structure in flux: The Naples/Capri papers, 405–434. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.131.15dieSuche in Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2010 [1982]. Where have all the adjectives gone? And other essays in semantics and syntax (Janua Linguarum. Series Maior 107). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar

Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7Suche in Google Scholar

Dowty, David R. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67. 547–619.10.1353/lan.1991.0021Suche in Google Scholar

Enç, Mürvet (1991). The Semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 1–25.Suche in Google Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1997. The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519949Suche in Google Scholar

Francez, Itamar. 2007. Existential propositions. Stanford: Stanford University dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Francez, Itamar. 2010. Context dependence and implicit arguments in existentials. Linguistics and Philosophy 33(1). 11–30.10.1007/s10988-010-9073-2Suche in Google Scholar

Fuchs, Anna. 1980. Accented subjects in ‘all–new’ sentences. Wege zur Universalienforschung (Festschrift für Hansjakob Seiler), 449–461. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Suche in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 149–188. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Harris, Alice & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in crosslinguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620553Suche in Google Scholar

Hazout, Ilan. 2004. The syntax of existential constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 35. 393–430.10.1162/0024389041402616Suche in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1976. Toward an explanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry 7. 89–150.Suche in Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward L. 1976. Towards a universal notion of “subject”. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 247–333. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

La Fauci, Nunzio & Michele Loporcaro. 1997. Outline of a theory of existentials on evidence from Romance. Studi italiani di linguistica teorica e applicata 26. 5–55.Suche in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607Suche in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 2000. When subjects behave like objects: A markedness analysis of sentence focus constructions across languages. Studies in Language 24. 611–682.10.1075/sl.24.3.06lamSuche in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Universal and typological aspects of agreement. In Hansjakob Seiler & Franz Joseph Stachowiak (eds.), Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen: Teil II: Die Techniken und ihr Zusammenhang in der Einzelsprachen, 201–267. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Suche in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 2014 [1982]. Universal and typological aspects of agreement. http://www.christianlehmann.eu/publ/lehmann_agreement.pdf (accessed March 2016).Suche in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax–lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Loporcaro, Michele. 1998. Sintassi comparata dell’accordo participiale romanzo. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Suche in Google Scholar

Maiden, Martin & Mair Parry (eds.). 1997. The dialects of Italy. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Manzini, Maria Rita & Leonardo Savoia. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romance: Morfosintassi generativa, 3 vols. Alessandria: Edizioni Dell’Orso.Suche in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 2003. Pronouns and agreement: The information status of pronominal affixes. Transactions of the Philological Society 101. 235–278.10.1111/1467-968X.00119Suche in Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith. 1978. Agreement. In Joseph Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, vol. 4, 331–374. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Parry, Mair. 1993. Piedmontese subject clitics: A diachronic perspective. Vox Romanica 52. 96–116.Suche in Google Scholar

Parry, Mair. 1997. Piedmont. In Martin Maiden & Mair Parry (eds.), The dialects of Italy, 237–244. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Parry, Mair. 2000. Accordo e soggetti postverbali in piemontese. In Actes du XXIIe congrés international de lingüistique e philologie romane, Bruxelles 1998, VI. De la grammaire des formes à la grammaire du sens, 391–402. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Suche in Google Scholar

Parry, Mair. 2005. Sociolinguistica e grammatica del dialetto di Cairo Montenotte: Parluma ‘d Coiri. Savona: Società Savonese di Storia Patria.Suche in Google Scholar

Parry, Mair. 2013. Variation and change in the presentational constructions of North–Western Italo-Romance varieties. In Elly van Gelderen, Michela Cennamo & Jóhanna Barðdal (eds.), Argument structure in flux: The Naples/Capri papers, 511–548. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.131.19parSuche in Google Scholar

Perlmutter, David. 1978. Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistic Society 4. 157–189.10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198Suche in Google Scholar

Perlmutter, David. 1989. Multiattachment and the Unaccusative Hypothesis: The perfect auxiliary in Italian. Probus 1. 63–120.10.1515/prbs.1989.1.1.63Suche in Google Scholar

Pinto, Manuela. 1997. Licensing and interpretation of inverted subjects in Italian. Utrecht: UiL OTS Dissertation series.Suche in Google Scholar

Poletto, Cecilia. 1993. La sintassi del soggetto nei dialetti italiani settentrionali. Padua: Unipress.Suche in Google Scholar

Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The higher functional field. Evidence from Northern Italian dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Poletto, Cecilia & Christina Tortora. 2016. Subject clitics: Syntax. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 772–785. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0047Suche in Google Scholar

Renzi, Lorenzo & Laura Vanelli. 1983. I pronomi soggetto in alcune varietà romanze. In Paola Benincà, Manlio Cortelazzo, Aldo Prosdocimi, Laura Vanelli & Alberto Zamboni (eds.), Scritti linguistici in onore di Giovan Battista Pellegrini, 121–145. Pisa: Pacini.Suche in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. On the status of subject clitics in Romance. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Carmen Silva-Corvalan (eds.), Studies in Romance linguistics, 391–419. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110878516-025Suche in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian. 2014. Subject clitics and macroparameters. In Paola Benincà, Adam Ledgeway & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Diachrony and dialects: Grammatical change in the dialects of Italy, 177–201. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701781.003.0009Suche in Google Scholar

Rosemeyer, Malte. 2013. Tornar and volver: The interplay of frequency and semantics in compound tense auxiliary selection in Medieval and Classical Spanish. In Elly van Gelderen, Michela Cennamo & Jóhanna Barðdal (eds.), Argument structure in flux: The Naples/Capri papers, 435–457. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.131.16rosSuche in Google Scholar

Saccon, Graziella. 1992. VP–internal arguments and locative subjects. Proceedings of the 22nd meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society. 383–397.Suche in Google Scholar

Saccon, Graziella. 1993. Post–verbal subjects: A study based on Italian and its dialects. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2002. Agreement impoverishment under subject inversion: A crosslinguistic analysis. In Gisbert Fanselow & Caroline Féry (eds.), Resolving conflicts in grammar (Linguistiche Berichte Sonderheft 11), 49–82. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 2006. Theticity. In Giuliano Bernini & Marcia L. Schwartz (eds.), Pragmatic organization of discourse in the languages of Europe, 255–308. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Savoia, Leonardo. 1997. The geographical distribution of the dialects. In Martin Maiden & Mair Parry (eds.), The dialects of Italy, 225–234. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Schwartz, Linda. 1993. On syntactic and semantic alignment of attributive and identificational constructions. In Robert Van Valin Jr (ed.), Advances in Role and Reference Grammar, 433–463. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.82.11schSuche in Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna. 1999. From anaphoric pronoun to grammatical agreement marker: Why objects don’t make it. Folia Linguistica 33(1/2). 225–251.10.1515/flin.1999.33.1-2.225Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, Carlota. 1997. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5606-6Suche in Google Scholar

Sorace, Antonella. 2000. Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language 76(4). 859–890.10.2307/417202Suche in Google Scholar

Tortora, Christina. 1997. The syntax and semantics of the weak locative. Newark, DE: University of Delaware dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Tortora, Christina. 2014. A comparative grammar of Borgomanerese. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945627.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Vanelli, Laura. 1997. Personal pronouns and demonstratives. In Martin Maiden & Mair Parry (eds.), The dialects of Italy, 106–115. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1990. Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66. 221–260.10.2307/414886Suche in Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2005. Exploring the syntax–semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610578Suche in Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. & Randy LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166799Suche in Google Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501743726Suche in Google Scholar

Wehr, Barbara. 1984. Diskursstrategien in Romanischen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Suche in Google Scholar

Wehr, Barbara. 1995. SE-Diathese im Italienischen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Suche in Google Scholar

Zamparelli, Roberto. 2000. Layers in the determiner phrase. New York: Garland.Suche in Google Scholar

Zeller, Jochen. 2013. Locative inversion in Bantu and predication. Linguistics 51. 1107–1146.10.1515/ling-2013-0046Suche in Google Scholar