Reception, Rediscovery, and Reimagination: Codex Bezae Cantabrigiensis and Luke 16:19–31
-
Gregory E. Lamb
Abstract
The reception of Luke 16:19–31 is ancient and variegated. It is ancient in that commentary for this pericope appears as early as the patristic era – mostly in the form of homilies – and variegated in that its interpretation has been hotly debated throughout church history. One recurring point of departure is the question of genre. Currently, most scholars assume the label “parable” despite the complex debate surrounding this slippery term. However, the reception history reveals that – prior to the Protestant Reformation – most viewed Luke 16:19–31 as historic narrative and not as parabolic. Thus, the question arises: “What caused this radical interpretational shift?” While some held to the fictive view of Luke 16:19–31 prior to the modern period (so Cyril of Alexandria et al.), this was a minority position until the Reformation – during which there was a surge of discovery/rediscovery of biblical manuscripts and exposure to variant readings within the sundry Greek New Testaments being published. Consequently, a paradigmatic shift of interpretation appears to have gained momentum after the rediscovery of Codex Bezae in 1562 by Theodore Beza, which contained the variant reading in Luke 16:19a – ειπεν δε και ετεραν παραβολην. This paper advances the fields of reception history and biblical studies by challenging the long-standing assumptions within the commentary tradition and textual criticism that Beza “ignored” Codex Bezae’s variants in publishing his Greek New Testament editions – as argued by Kurt and Barbara Aland et al. – and that “parable” is the best descriptor for Luke 16:19–31.
Works Cited
Aalen, Sverre. 1996. “St Luke’s Gospel and the Last Chapters of I Enoch.” New Testament Studies 13 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002868850000093x.Suche in Google Scholar
Aland, Barbara, Kurt Aland, Johannes Karavidopoulos, Carlo, M., and Bruce, M., eds. 2012. Nestle-Aland Novum Testamentum Graece. 28th ed. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.Suche in Google Scholar
Aland, Barbara, Kurt Aland, Johannes Karavidopoulos, Carlo, M., and Bruce, M., eds. 2014. The Greek New Testament. 5th ed. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.Suche in Google Scholar
Aland, Barbara and Kurt Aland. 1987. The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism, translated by Erroll F. Rhodes. Grand Rapids. Eerdmans; Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004676503Suche in Google Scholar
Aland, Barbara, Kurt Aland, and Klaus Wachtel, eds. in collaboration with Klaus Witte. 1999. Text und Textwert der Griechischen Handschriften des Neuen Testaments. Vol. 4: Die Synoptischen Evangelien. No. 3: Das Lukasevangelium. 3.2: Resultate der Kollation und Hauptliste sowie Ergänzungen. Arbeiten zur Neutestamentlichen Textforschung 31. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110801767Suche in Google Scholar
Aquinas, St. Thomas. 2006. Summa Theologiæ: Vol. 12 (Ia. 84–89), Human Intelligence, edited and translated by Paul T. Durbin. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Armstrong, Elizabeth. 1954 [2011]. Robert Estienne, Royal Printer: An Historical Study of the Elder Stephanus. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Baird, William. 1992–2013. History of New Testament Research: From Deism to Tübingen, vol. 3. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress.Suche in Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard J. 1998. “The Rich Man and Lazarus: The Parable and the Parallels.” In The Fate of the Dead: Studies on the Jewish and Christian Apocalypses, 97–118. Supplements to Novum Testamentum 93. Leiden: Brill. Originally published in New Testament Studies 37.2 (1991): 225–46.10.1163/9789004267411_006Suche in Google Scholar
Baynes, Leslie. 2016. “The Parables of Enoch and Luke’s Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus.” In Enoch and the Synoptic Gospels: Reminiscences, Allusions, Intertextuality, edited by Loren T. Stuckenbruck and Gabriele Boccaccini, 129–51. Early Judaism and Its Literature 44. Atlanta: SBL Press.10.2307/j.ctt1ffjp3z.10Suche in Google Scholar
Beza, Theodore. 1565. Jesu Christi D. N. Novum testamentum, Sive Novum fœdus. Cuius Græco textui respondent interpretationes duæ: una, vetus: altera, nova, Theodori Bezæ, diligenter ab eo recognita. Eiusdem Th. Bezæ Annotationes, quas itidem hac secunda editione recognouit, et accessione non parua locupletauit. Geneva: Henricus Stephanus.Suche in Google Scholar
Beza, Theodore. 1588. Jesu Christi Domini Nostri Novum testamentum, Sive Novum fœdus. Cuius Græco contextui respondent interpretationes duæ: una, vetus: altera, Theodori Bezæ, diligenter ab eo recognita. Eiusdem Th. Bezæ Annotationes, quas itidem hac quarta editione recognouit, et accessione non parua locupletauit: quod docebunt asterisci ad marginem ipsarum positi. Geneva: Henricus Stephanus.Suche in Google Scholar
Beza, Theodore. 1582. Jesu Christi Domini Nostri Novum testamentum, Sive Novum fœdus. Cuius Græco contextui respondent interpretationes duæ: una, vetus: altera, nova, Theodori Bezæ, diligenter ab eo recognita. Eiusdem Th. Bezæ Annotationes, quas itidem hac tertia editione recognouit, & accessione non parua locupletauit. Geneva: Henricus Stephanus.Suche in Google Scholar
Beza, Theodore. 1598. Jesu Christi Domini Nostri Novum testamentum, Sive Novum fœdus. Cuius Græco contextui respondent interpretationes duæ: una, vetus: altera, nova, Theodori Bezæ. Eiusdem Th. Bezæ Annotationes, in quibus ratione Interpretationis vocum reddita, additur Synopsis doctrinæ in Euangelica historia & Epistolis Apostolicis comprehensæ, & ipse qupque contextus, quasibreui commentario explicatur. Geneva: Sumptibus Hæred. Eust. Vignon.Suche in Google Scholar
Beza, Theodore. 1556. Novum Domini Nostri Jesu Christi testamentum, Latinè iam olim à Veteri interprete, nunc denuo à Theodoro Beza versum: cum eiusdem annotationibus, in quibus ratio interpretationis redditur. Geneva: Roberti Stephani.Suche in Google Scholar
Blomberg, Craig L. 2012. Interpreting the Parables, 2nd ed. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Bock, Darrell L. 1996. Luke. 2 vols. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Suche in Google Scholar
Bowen, Karen L. and Dirk Imhof. 2008. Christopher Plantin and Engraved Book Illustrations in Sixteenth-Century Europe. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Bredenhof, Reuben. 2019. Failure and Prospect: Lazarus and the Rich Man (Luke 16:19–31) in the Context of Luke-Acts, edited by Chris Keith. The Library of New Testament Studies 603. London; New Delhi; New York; Sydney: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9780567681768Suche in Google Scholar
Calvin, John. 2005. Harmony of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, translated by William Pringle. Calvin’s Commentaries 16. Grand Rapids: Baker.Suche in Google Scholar
Collins, John J. 2016. The Apocalyptic Imagination: An Introduction to Jewish Apocalyptic Literature, 3rd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Suche in Google Scholar
Comfort, Philip W. 2008. New Testament Text and Translation Commentary: Commentary on the Variant Readings of the Ancient New Testament Manuscripts and How They Relate to the Major English Translations. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale.Suche in Google Scholar
Culy, Martin M., Mikeal C. Parsons, and Joshua J. Stigall. 2010. Luke: A Handbook on the Greek Text. Baylor Handbook on the Greek New Testament. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
de S. Charo Hugonis. 1732. Hugonis de Sancto Charo … Tomus Sextus in Evangelia secundum Matthaeum, Lucam, Marcum & Joannem. Venice: Nicolas Pezzana.Suche in Google Scholar
Dodd, C. H. 1958. The Parables of the Kingdom, 3rd ed. New York: Scribner’s Sons.Suche in Google Scholar
Farthing, J. L. 2007. “Beza, Theodore.” In Dictionary of Major Biblical Interpreters, edited by Donald K. McKim, 193–7. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. 1981–1985. The Gospel according to Luke. 2 vols. AB 28–28A. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Suche in Google Scholar
Fonck, Leopold. 2000. The Parables of Christ: An Exegetical and Practical Explanation, edited by George O’Neill. Translated by E. Leahy. Harrison, NY: Roman Catholic Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Froehlich, K. 2007. “Thomas Aquinas.” In Dictionary of Major Biblical Interpreters, edited by Donald K. McKim, 979–85. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Gerhardsson, Birger. 2004. “If We Do Not Cut the Parables Out of Their Frames.” In The Historical Jesus: Critical Concepts in Religious Studies, Volume II: The Teaching of Jesus, edited by Craig A. Evans, 93–106. London; New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Gerhardsson, Birger. 1988. “The Narrative Meshalim in the Synoptic Gospels: A Comparison with the Narrative Meshalim in the Old Testament.” New Testament Studies 34 (3): 339–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0028688500020142.Suche in Google Scholar
Gill, John. 2014. John Gill’s Exposition of the Bible. Bible Study Tools. http://www.biblestudytools.com/commentaries/gills-exposition-of-the-bible/luke-16-19.html (accessed August 22, 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Gowler, David B. and Paul, Moldovan. 2017. “David Gowler on Understanding the Parables.” Overthinking Christian. https://overthinkingchristian.com/2017/10/12/david-gowler-on-understanding-the-parables (accessed October 12, 2017).Suche in Google Scholar
Gressmann, Hugo. 1918. Vom reichen Mann und armen Lazarus: eine literargeschichtliche Studie. Abhandlungen der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Philosophisch-historische Klasse 1918, Vol. 7. Berlin: Verlag der königlich Akademie der Wissenschaften.Suche in Google Scholar
Hall, Basil. 1963 [1976]. “Biblical Scholarship: Editions and Commentaries.” In The Cambridge History of the Bible: The West from the Reformation to the Present Day, edited by S. L. Greenslade, 38–93. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521042543.003Suche in Google Scholar
Harris, Murray J. 1986. “The New Testament View of Life After Death.” Themelios 11 (2): 47–52.Suche in Google Scholar
Heinsius, Daniel, ed. 1626. Theonis Sophistæ: Progymnasmata. Leiden: Bonaventure and Abraham Elzevir.Suche in Google Scholar
Hinks, John. 2013. “The Book Trade in Early Modern Britain: Centres, Peripheries and Networks.” In Print Culture and Peripheries in Early Modern Europe: A Contribution to the History of Printing and the Book Trade in Small European and Spanish Cities, edited by Benito R. Costas, 101–26. Library of the Written Word 24, The Handpress World 18. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004235755_005Suche in Google Scholar
Hock, Ronald F. 1987. “Lazarus and Mycillus: Greco-Roman Backgrounds to Luke 16:19–31.” Journal of Biblical Literature 106 (3): 447–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/3261067.Suche in Google Scholar
Jülicher, Adolf. 1888–1899. Die Gleichnisreden Jesu. 2 vols. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Suche in Google Scholar
Karris, Robert J. 2021. Cardinal Hugh of St. Cher’s Commentary on Jesus’ Parable of Dives and Lazarus (Luke 16:19–31). Eugene, OR: Pickwick.Suche in Google Scholar
Krans, Jan. 2006. Beyond What is Written: Erasmus and Beza as Conjectural Critics of the New Testament. New Testament Tools and Studies 35. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047410515Suche in Google Scholar
Lapide, Cornelius À. 2008. The Great Commentary of Cornelius A [sic] Lapide: The Holy Gospel according to Saint Mark; The Holy Gospel according to Saint Luke, translated by Thomas W. Mossman, revised by Michael J. Miller. Fitzwilliam, NH: Loreto.Suche in Google Scholar
Lehtipuu, Outi. 2007. The Afterlife Imagery in Luke’s Story of the Rich Man and Lazarus, edited by M. M. Mitchell and D. P. Moessner. Supplements to Novum Testamentum 123. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004153011.i-361Suche in Google Scholar
Levine, Amy Jill. 2014. Short Stories by Jesus: The Enigmatic Parables of a Controversial Rabbi. San Francisco: HarperOne.Suche in Google Scholar
Lightfoot, John. 1859. Horæ Hebraicæ et Talmudicæ: Hebrew and Talmudic Exercitations upon the Gospels, the Acts, Some Chapters of St. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans, and the First Epistle to the Corinthians, Vol. 3. Translated by Robert Gandell. Oxford; London; New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Marlorat, Augustin. 1570. Novi Testamenti Catholica Expositio Ecclesiastica. Genève: Universitätsbibliothek Basel.Suche in Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. 1994. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.Suche in Google Scholar
Nickelsburg, George W. E. 2003. “Revisiting the Rich and the Poor in 1 Enoch 92–105 and the Gospel according to Luke.” In George W. E. Nickelsburg in Perspective: An Ongoing Dialogue of Learning, Vol. 80, edited by Jacob Neusner and Alan J. Avery-Peck, 547–88. 2 vols. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004531314_009Suche in Google Scholar
Parker, David C. 1992. Codex Bezae: An Early Christian Manuscript and Its Text. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511470479Suche in Google Scholar
Payne, J. B. 2007. “Erasmus, Desiderius.” In Dictionary of Major Biblical Interpreters, edited by Donald K. McKim, 412–8. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Perry, Ben Edwin, trans. 1965. Babrius and Phaedrus: Fables. Loeb Classical Library 436. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Salomon, David A. 2012. An Introduction to the Glossa Ordinaria as Medieval Hypertext. Religion and Culture in the Middle Ages. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Sandmel, Samuel. 1962. “Parallelomania.” Journal of Biblical Literature 81 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/3264821.Suche in Google Scholar
Scrivener, Frederick H. A. 1864. Bezae Codex Cantabrigiensis, Being an Exact Copy, in Ordinary Type, of the Celebrated Uncial Graeco-Latin Manuscript of the Four Gospels and Acts of the Apostles, Written Early in the Sixth Century, and Presented to the University of Cambridge by Theodore Beza, A.D. 1581. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell, and Co.Suche in Google Scholar
Skinner, Christopher W. 2015. Reading John. Cascade Companions. Eugene, OR: Cascade.Suche in Google Scholar
Snodgrass, Klyne R. 2008. Stories with Intent: A Comprehensive Guide to the Parables of Jesus. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Suche in Google Scholar
Stein, Robert H. 1994. The Method and Message of Jesus’ Teachings, rev. ed. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Suche in Google Scholar
Strong, Justin David. 2021. The Fables of Jesus in the Gospel of Luke: A New Foundation for the Study of Parables. Studies in Cultural Contexts of the Bible 5. Leiden: Brill.10.30965/9783657760657_007Suche in Google Scholar
Thompson, Marianne Meye. 2015. John: A Commentary. The New Testament Library. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Suche in Google Scholar
Thurén, Lauri. 2014. Parables Unplugged: Reading the Lukan Parables in Their Rhetorical Context. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress.10.2307/j.ctt9m0vdvSuche in Google Scholar
Tucker, Jeffrey T. 1998. Example Stories: Perspectives on Four Parables in the Gospel of Luke. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 162. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic.Suche in Google Scholar
Vincent, Marvin R. 1899. A History of the Textual Criticism of the New Testament, edited by Shailer Matthew. New Testament Handbooks. New York; London: Macmillan.Suche in Google Scholar
Webb, Ruth. 2009. Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Burlington, VT; Farnham, Surrey, UK: Ashgate.Suche in Google Scholar
Wesley, John. 1987. The Works of John Wesley: Sermons IV, 115–151, vol. 4, edited by Albert C. Outler, 115–51. New York: Abingdon.Suche in Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Ruben. 2015. Puzzling the Parables of Jesus: Methods and Interpretations. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress.10.2307/j.ctt155j2q7Suche in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Reception, Rediscovery, and Reimagination: Codex Bezae Cantabrigiensis and Luke 16:19–31
- Obscuring New Testament Slavery: A Study of the Translation History of Δοῦλος
- Early Nineteenth-Century Biblical Scholarship and the Production of The Book of Mormon
- Resisting Wirkungsgeschichte: Bible Translators as Agents of Reception
- A Mediatized Bible: Discourses on the Hebrew Bible in Swedish Newspaper Debates
- Ngāti Hotu in Paradise: How Contemporary Hotu in Aotearoa New Zealand Defend their White Pre-Polynesian Settlement Theory
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Reception, Rediscovery, and Reimagination: Codex Bezae Cantabrigiensis and Luke 16:19–31
- Obscuring New Testament Slavery: A Study of the Translation History of Δοῦλος
- Early Nineteenth-Century Biblical Scholarship and the Production of The Book of Mormon
- Resisting Wirkungsgeschichte: Bible Translators as Agents of Reception
- A Mediatized Bible: Discourses on the Hebrew Bible in Swedish Newspaper Debates
- Ngāti Hotu in Paradise: How Contemporary Hotu in Aotearoa New Zealand Defend their White Pre-Polynesian Settlement Theory
