Startseite Sozialwissenschaften Reflections on the Past and Present of Research on Partisan Identity
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Reflections on the Past and Present of Research on Partisan Identity

  • Alexa Bankert

    Alexa Bankert is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Georgia. Her research examines the origins, measurement, and effects of positive and negative partisanship in the U.S. two-party system as well as in European multi-party systems. Her work has appeared in peer-reviewed journals such as the Journal of Politics, the British Journal of Political Science, Political Psychology, Political Behavior, and Electoral Studies. She is the recipient of several awards including the Distinguished Junior Scholars Award given by the Political Psychology Section of the American Political Science Association, and the Janet Box-Steffensmeier Award for Outstanding Female Graduate Students in Methodology.

     EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 29. November 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Informationen für Autor*innen Erkunden Sie dieses Fachgebiet
The Forum
Aus der Zeitschrift The Forum Band 19 Heft 3

Abstract

Scholarship on partisanship has been transformed by political scientists’ embrace of social and cognitive psychology in the past few decades. This interdisciplinary union has drastically changed the way political scientists examine the origins and effects of partisanship. In this essay, I provide a brief history of scholarship on partisanship, its transformation into a partisan identity as well as its role in the study of polarization. I then demonstrate how this identity framework has propelled research on negative partisan identity in the U.S. two-party system and European multi-party systems. I conclude with a few avenues for future research that could enrich our understanding of partisanship.

Scholarship on partisanship has been transformed by political scientists’ embrace of social and cognitive psychology in the past few decades. Since then, the concept of partisan identity has become widely known beyond the narrow subfield of political psychology. Indeed, the sheer volume of research on the origins, measurement, and effect of partisan identity on political behavior is indicative of its centrality in the general discipline of political science. In this essay, I provide a brief (and therefore necessarily incomplete) history of scholarship on partisanship as well as its transformation into a partisan identity. I then review contemporary research on positive and negative partisan identity in the U.S. and beyond, focusing on their differential effects on political attitudes and behavior. Last, I sketch out a few thoughts on the complexities and caveats of current scholarship, including a plea for more research on the interaction of partisanship with other identities, the necessity of studying partisanship in more externally valid contexts, as well as the promise of common identities in bridging partisan divisions.

Keywords: negative partisanship; partisan identity; partisanship; polarization
Corresponding author: Alexa Bankert, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, School of Public and International Affairs, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA, E-mail:

About the author

Alexa Bankert

Alexa Bankert is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Georgia. Her research examines the origins, measurement, and effects of positive and negative partisanship in the U.S. two-party system as well as in European multi-party systems. Her work has appeared in peer-reviewed journals such as the Journal of Politics, the British Journal of Political Science, Political Psychology, Political Behavior, and Electoral Studies. She is the recipient of several awards including the Distinguished Junior Scholars Award given by the Political Psychology Section of the American Political Science Association, and the Janet Box-Steffensmeier Award for Outstanding Female Graduate Students in Methodology.

References

Abramowitz, A. I., and S. Webster. 2016. “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of US Elections in the 21st Century.” Electoral Studies 41: 12–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Abrams, D. E., and M. A. Hogg. 1990. Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances. New York: Springer-Verlag Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Achen, C. H. 2002. “Parental Socialization and Rational Party Identification.” Political Behavior 24 (2): 151–70, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021278208671.10.1023/A:1021278208671Suche in Google Scholar

Ahler, D. J., and G. Sood. 2018. “The Parties in Our Heads: Misperceptions About Party Composition and Their Consequences.” The Journal of Politics 80 (3): 964–81, https://doi.org/10.1086/697253.Suche in Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.Suche in Google Scholar

Arceneaux, K., and R. J. Vander Wielen. 2013. “The Effects of Need for Cognition and Need for Affect on Partisan Evaluations.” Political Psychology 34 (1): 23–42, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00925.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Bakker, B. N., Y. Lelkes, and A. Malka. 2021. “Reconsidering the Link Between Self-Reported Personality Traits and Political Preferences.” American Political Science Review: 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421000605.Suche in Google Scholar

Bankert, A. 2020. “Negative and Positive Partisanship in the 2016 US Presidential Elections.” Political Behavior: 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09599-1.Suche in Google Scholar

Bankert, A. 2021. “Negative Partisanship Among Independents in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Elections.” Presented at the Annual Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association.10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102490Suche in Google Scholar

Bankert, A., A. Del Ponte, and L. Huddy. 2017. “Partisanship in Times of Crisis – A Case Study of Italian Partisanship.” Presented at the Annual Conference at the International Society of Political Psychology.Suche in Google Scholar

Bankert, A., L. Huddy, and M. Rosema. 2017. “Measuring Partisanship as a Social Identity in Multi-Party Systems.” Political Behavior 39 (1): 103–32, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9349-5.Suche in Google Scholar

Barreto, A. A., and N. G. Napolio. 2020. “Bifurcating American Identity: Partisanship, Sexual Orientation, and the 2016 Presidential Election.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 8 (1): 143–59, https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1442727.Suche in Google Scholar

Bartels, L. M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 35–50, https://doi.org/10.2307/2669291.Suche in Google Scholar

Bartels, L. M. 2008. “The Irrational Electorate.” Wilson Quarterly 32 (4): 44–50.Suche in Google Scholar

Bosson, J. K., A. B. Johnson, K. Niederhoffer, and W. B. SwannJr. 2006. “Interpersonal Chemistry through Negativity: Bonding by Sharing Negative Attitudes About Others.” Personal Relationships 13: 135–50, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00109.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Brader, T. A., and J. A. Tucker. 2009. “What’s Left Behind when the Party’s Over: Survey Experiments on the Effects of Partisan Cues in Putin’s Russia.” Politics & Policy 37 (4): 843–68, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2009.00201.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B. 1999. “The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?” Journal of Social Issues 55 (3): 429–44, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126.Suche in Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B. 2000. “Superodinate Goals versus Superordinate Identity as Bases of Intergroup Cooperation.” In Social Identity Processes: Trends in Theory and Research, edited by D. Capozza, and R. Brown, 117–132. London: Sage Publications Ltd.10.4135/9781446218617.n8Suche in Google Scholar

Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, and D. E. Stokes. 1980. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Carlson, E. 2016. “Finding Partisanship where We Least Expect it: Evidence of Partisan Bias in a New African Democracy.” Political Behavior 38 (1): 129–54, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9309-5.Suche in Google Scholar

Caruana, N. J., R. M. McGregor, and L. B. Stephenson. 2015. “The Power of the Dark Side: Negative Partisanship and Political Behaviour in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 48 (04): 771–89, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423914000882.Suche in Google Scholar

Cassese, E. C. 2021. “Partisan Dehumanization in American Politics.” Political Behavior 43 (1): 29–50, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09545-w.Suche in Google Scholar

Castle, J. J., and K. K. Stepp. 2021. “Partisanship, Religion, and Issue Polarization in the United States: A Reassessment.” Political Behavior 43: 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09668-5.Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen, G. L. 2003. “Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (5): 808, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808.Suche in Google Scholar

Cookson, J. A., J. E. Engelberg, and W. Mullins. 2020. “Does Partisanship Shape Investor Beliefs? Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic.” The Review of Asset Pricing Studies 10 (4): 863–93, https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/raaa018.Suche in Google Scholar

Downs, A. 1957. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy 65 (2): 135–50, https://doi.org/10.1086/257897.Suche in Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N., S. Klar, Y. Krupnikov, M. Levendusky, and J. B. Ryan. 2020a. “(Mis-) Estimating Affective Polarization.” Journal of Politics (forthcoming).10.1086/715603Suche in Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N., S. Klar, Y. Krupnikov, M. Levendusky, and J. B. Ryan. 2020b. “How Affective Polarization Shapes Americans’ Political Beliefs: A Study of Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Experimental Political Science: 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2020.28.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellemers, N., R. Spears, and B. Doosje. 2002. “Self and Social Identity.” Annual Review of Psychology 53 (1): 161–86, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228.Suche in Google Scholar

Elsbach, K. D., and C. B. Bhattacharya. 2001. “Defining Who You are by What You’re Not: Organizational Disidentification and the National Rifle Association.” Organization Science 12 (4): 393–413, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.393.10638.Suche in Google Scholar

Endres, K., C. Panagopoulos, and D. P. Green. 2020. “Elite Messaging and Partisan Consumerism: An Evaluation of President Trump’s Tweets and Polarization of Corporate Brand Images.” Political Research Quarterly 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920939188.Suche in Google Scholar

Fiorina, M. P. 1977. “An Outline for a Model of Party Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 21: 601–25, https://doi.org/10.2307/2110583.Suche in Google Scholar

Fiorina, M. P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Franklin, C. H., and J. E. Jackson. 1983. “The Dynamics of Party Identification.” American Political Science Review 77 (4): 957–73, https://doi.org/10.2307/1957569.Suche in Google Scholar

Gadarian, S. K., S. W. Goodman, and T. B. Pepinsky. 2021. “Partisanship, Health Behavior, and Policy Attitudes in the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic.” PLoS One 16 (4): e0249596, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249596.Suche in Google Scholar

Gaertner, S. L., J. F. Dovidio, M. C. Rust, J. A. Nier, B. S. Banker, C. M. Ward, and M. Houlette. 1999. “Reducing Intergroup Bias: Elements of Intergroup Cooperation.” Journal of personality and social psychology 76 (3): 388.10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.388Suche in Google Scholar

Garzia, D. 2013. “Changing Parties, Changing Partisans: The Personalization of Partisan Attachments in Western Europe.” Political Psychology 34 (1): 67–89, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00918.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Gerber, A. S., G. A. Huber, D. Doherty, C. M. Dowling, C. Raso, and S. E. Ha. 2011. “Personality Traits and Participation in Political Processes.” The Journal of Politics 73 (3): 692–706, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381611000399.Suche in Google Scholar

Gerber, A. S., G. A. Huber, and E. Washington. 2010. “Party Affiliation, Partisanship, and Political Beliefs: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 104 (4): 720–44, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055410000407.Suche in Google Scholar

González, R., J. Manzi, J. L. Saiz, M. Brewer, P. De Tezanos‐Pinto, D. Torres, and N. Aldunate. 2008. “Interparty Attitudes in Chile: Coalitions as Superordinate Social Identities.” Political Psychology 29 (1): 93–118, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00614.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Goren, P., C. M. Federico, and M. C. Kittilson. 2009. “Source Cues, Partisan Identities, and Political Value Expression.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (4): 805–20, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00402.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Green, D., B. Palmquist, and E. Schickler. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven: Yale University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Greene, S. 1999. “Understanding Party Identification: A Social Identity Approach.” Political Psychology 20 (2): 393–403, https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00150.Suche in Google Scholar

Greene, S. 2002. “The Social‐Psychological Measurement of Partisanship.” Political Behavior 24 (3): 171–97, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021859907145.10.1023/A:1021859907145Suche in Google Scholar

Greene, S. 2004. “Social Identity Theory and Party Identification.” Social Science Quarterly 85 (1): 136–53, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08501010.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Groenendyk, E. W., and A. J. Banks. 2014. “Emotional Rescue: How Affect Helps Partisans Overcome Collective Action Problems.” Political Psychology 35 (3): 359–78, https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12045.Suche in Google Scholar

Grossman, G., S. Kim, J. M. Rexer, and H. Thirumurthy. 2020. “Political Partisanship Influences Behavioral Responses to Governors’ Recommendations for COVID-19 Prevention in the United States.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (39): 24144–53, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2007835117.Suche in Google Scholar

Hagevi, M. 2015. “Bloc Identification in Multi-Party Systems: The Case of the Swedish Two-Bloc System.” West European Politics 38 (1): 73–92, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.911480.Suche in Google Scholar

Haidt, J., and J. Graham. 2007. “When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals May Not Recognize.” Social Justice Research 20 (1): 98–116, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z.Suche in Google Scholar

Haidt, J., and C. Joseph. 2004. “Intuitive Ethics: How Innately Prepared Intuitions Generate Culturally Variable Virtues.” Daedalus 133 (4): 55–66, https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526042365555.Suche in Google Scholar

Henderson, J. A., and A. G. Theodoridis. 2018. “Seeing Spots: Partisanship, Negativity and the Conditional Receipt of Campaign Advertisements.” Political Behavior 40 (4): 965–87, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9432-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Hogg, M. A., and S. A. Reid. 2006. “Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms.” Communication Theory 16 (1): 7–30, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Huddy, L. 2001. “From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory.” Political Psychology 22 (1): 127–56, https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00230.Suche in Google Scholar

Huddy, L., A. Bankert, and C. Davies. 2018. “Expressive versus Instrumental Partisanship in Multiparty European Systems.” Political Psychology 39: 173–99, https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12482.Suche in Google Scholar

Huddy, L., L. Mason, and L. Aarøe. 2015. “Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity.” American Political Science Review 109 (1): 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000604.Suche in Google Scholar

Iyengar, S., G. Sood, and Y. Lelkes. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology, a Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 405–31, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038.Suche in Google Scholar

Iyengar, S., and S. J. Westwood. 2015. “Fear and Loathing Across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 690–707, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152.Suche in Google Scholar

Jackson, J. 1975. “Issues, Party Choices, and Presidential Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 19: 161–85, https://doi.org/10.2307/2110431.Suche in Google Scholar

Janoff-Bulman, R. 2009. “To Provide or Protect: Motivational Bases of Political Liberalism and Conservatism.” Psychological Inquiry 20 (2–3): 120–8, https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028581.Suche in Google Scholar

Johnston, R. 2006. “Party Identification: Unmoved Mover or Sum of Preferences?” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 329–51, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170523.Suche in Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., J. Glaser, A. W. Kruglanski, and F. J. Sulloway. 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 129 (3): 339, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339.Suche in Google Scholar

Kalmoe, N. P., and L. Mason. 2019. “Lethal Mass Partisanship: Prevalence, Correlates, and Electoral Contingencies.” In National Capital Area Political Science Association American Politics Meeting.Suche in Google Scholar

Killian, M., and C. Wilcox. 2008. “Do Abortion Attitudes Lead to Party Switching?” Political Research Quarterly 61 (4): 561–73, https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907312981.Suche in Google Scholar

Klar, S. 2014. “Partisanship in a Social Setting.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (3): 687–704.10.1111/ajps.12087Suche in Google Scholar

Klar, S. 2018. “When Common Identities Decrease Trust: An Experimental Study of Partisan Women.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (3): 610–22, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12366.Suche in Google Scholar

Klar, S., Y. Krupnikov, and J. B. Ryan. 2018. “Affective Polarization or Partisan Disdain? Untangling a Dislike for the Opposing Party from a Dislike of Partisanship.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82 (2): 379–90, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy014.Suche in Google Scholar

Lavine, H. G., C. D. Johnston, and M. R. Steenbergen. 2012. The Ambivalent Partisan: How Critical Loyalty Promotes Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199772759.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Lelkes, Y., and S. J. Westwood. 2017. “The Limits of Partisan Prejudice.” The Journal of Politics 79 (2): 485–501, https://doi.org/10.1086/688223.Suche in Google Scholar

Levendusky, M. S. 2013. “Why do Partisan Media Polarize Viewers?” American Journal of Political Science 57 (3): 611–23, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12008.Suche in Google Scholar

Levendusky, M. S. 2018. “Americans, Not Partisans: Can Priming American National Identity Reduce Affective Polarization?” The Journal of Politics 80 (1): 59–70, https://doi.org/10.1086/693987.Suche in Google Scholar

Levendusky, M., and N. Malhotra. 2016. “Does Media Coverage of Partisan Polarization Affect Political Attitudes?” Political Communication 33 (2): 283–301, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1038455.Suche in Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, M. S., H. Norpoth, W. Jacoby, and H. F. Weisberg. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.92266Suche in Google Scholar

Lupu, N. 2013. “Party Brands and Partisanship: Theory with Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Argentina.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 49–64, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00615.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Luttig, M. D. 2017. “Authoritarianism and Affective Polarization: A New View on the Origins of Partisan Extremism.” Public Opinion Quarterly 81 (4): 866–95, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfx023.Suche in Google Scholar

MacKuen, M. B., R. S. Erikson, and J. A. Stimson. 1989. “Macropartisanship.” American Political Science Review 83 (4): 1125–42, https://doi.org/10.2307/1961661.Suche in Google Scholar

Mael, F. A., and L. E. Tetrick. 1992. “Identifying Organizational Identification.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 52 (4): 813–24, https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004002.Suche in Google Scholar

Maggiotto, M. A., and J. E. Piereson. 1977. “Partisan Identification and Electoral Choice: The Hostility Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science 21 (4): 745–67, doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2110735.Suche in Google Scholar

Malka, A., and Y. Lelkes. 2010. “More Than Ideology: Conservative–Liberal Identity and Receptivity to Political Cues.” Social Justice Research 23 (2): 156–88, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0114-3.Suche in Google Scholar

Martherus, J. L., A. G. Martinez, P. K. Piff, and A. G. Theodoridis. 2021. “Party Animals? Extreme Partisan Polarization and Dehumanization.” Political Behavior 43 (2): 517–40, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09559-4.Suche in Google Scholar

Mason, L. 2015. ““I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 128–45, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12089.Suche in Google Scholar

Mason, L. (2016). “A cross-cutting calm: How social sorting drives affective polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (S1): 351–77.10.1093/poq/nfw001Suche in Google Scholar

Mason, L. 2018. “Ideologues Without Issues: The Polarizing Consequences of Ideological Identities.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82 (S1): 866–87, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy005.Suche in Google Scholar

Mason, L., and J. Wronski. 2018. “One Tribe to Bind Them All: How Our Social Group Attachments Strengthen Partisanship.” Political Psychology 39: 257–77, https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12485.Suche in Google Scholar

Mason, L., J. Wronski, and J. V. Kane. 2021. “Activating Animus: The Uniquely Social Roots of Trump Support.” American Political Science Review: 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421000563.Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, A. H., W. E. Miller, A. S. Raine, and T. A. Brown. 1976. “A Majority Party in Disarray: Policy Polarization in the 1972 Election.” American Political Science Review 70 (3): 753–78, https://doi.org/10.2307/1959866.Suche in Google Scholar

Medeiros, M., and A. Noël. 2014. “The Forgotten Side of Partisanship: Negative Party Identification in Four Anglo-American Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (7): 1022–46, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013488560.Suche in Google Scholar

Meffert, M. F., S. Huber, T. Gschwend, and F. U. Pappi. 2011. “More than Wishful Thinking: Causes and Consequences of Voters ’ Electoral Expectations about Parties and Coalitions.” Electoral Studies 30 (4): 804–15.10.1016/j.electstud.2011.08.001Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, P. R., and P. J. Conover. 2015. “Red and Blue States of Mind: Partisan Hostility and Voting in the United States.” Political Research Quarterly 68 (2): 225–39, https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915577208.Suche in Google Scholar

Mondak, J. J. 2010. Personality and the Foundations of Political Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511761515Suche in Google Scholar

Mondak, J. J., and K. D. Halperin. 2008. “A Framework for the Study of Personality and Political Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science 38 (2): 335–62, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123408000173.Suche in Google Scholar

Mosier, S. L., and A. P. Rimal. 2020. “Where’s the Meat? An Evaluation of Diet and Partisanship Identification.” British Food Journal 122: 896–909, https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2019-0193.Suche in Google Scholar

Mudde, C., and C. R. Kaltwasser. 2018. “Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the Contemporary and Future Research Agenda.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (13): 1667–93, https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018789490.Suche in Google Scholar

Nie, N. H., and K. Andersen. 1974. “Mass Belief Systems Revisited: Political Change and Attitude Structure.” The Journal of Politics 36 (3): 540–91, https://doi.org/10.2307/2129245.Suche in Google Scholar

Nie, N. H., S. Verba, and J. R. Petrocik. 2013. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Oshri, O., O. Yair, and L. Huddy. 2021. The Importance of Attachment to an Ideological Group in Multi-Party Systems: Evidence from Israel. Unpublished manuscript.10.1177/13540688211044475Suche in Google Scholar

Page, B. I., and C. C. Jones. 1979. “Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the Vote.” American Political Science Review 73 (4): 1071–89.10.2307/1953990Suche in Google Scholar

Panagopoulos, C., D. P. Green, J. Krasno, M. Schwam-Baird, and K. Endres. 2020. “Partisan Consumerism: Experimental Tests of Consumer Reactions to Corporate Political Activity.” The Journal of Politics 82 (3): 996–1007, https://doi.org/10.1086/707491.Suche in Google Scholar

Pickup, M., D. Stecula, and C. Van Der Linden. 2020. “Novel Coronavirus, Old Partisanship: COVID-19 Attitudes and Behaviours in the United States and Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 53 (2): 357–64, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423920000463.Suche in Google Scholar

Roccas, S., and M. B. Brewer. 2002. “Social Identity Complexity.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 6 (2): 88–106, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0602_01.Suche in Google Scholar

Rogowski, J. C., and J. L. Sutherland. 2016. “How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization.” Political Behavior 38 (2): 485–508, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9323-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Rose, R., and W. Mishler. 1998. “Negative and Positive Party Identification in Post-Communist Countries.” Electoral Studies 17 (2): 217–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0261-3794(98)00016-x.Suche in Google Scholar

Shafranek, R. M. 2021. “Political Considerations in Nonpolitical Decisions: A Conjoint Analysis of Roommate Choice.” Political Behavior 43 (1): 271–300, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09554-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Tajfel, H. E.(Editor). 1978. Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations 33 (47): 74.Suche in Google Scholar

Turner, J. C., M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, and M. S. Wetherell. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Valentino, N. A., T. Brader, E. W. Groenendyk, K. Gregorowicz, and V. L. Hutchings. 2011. “Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation.” The Journal of Politics 73 (1): 156–70, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381610000939.Suche in Google Scholar

Weisberg, H. F. 1980. “A Multidimensional Conceptualization of Party Identification.” Political Behavior 2 (1): 33–60, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00989755.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhong, C. B., K. W. Phillips, G. J. Leonardelli, and A. D. Galinsky. 2008. “Negational Categorization and Intergroup Behavior.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34 (6): 793–806, https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208315457.Suche in Google Scholar
Published Online: 2021-11-29

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Introduction
  3. Introduction Fall 2021
  4. Articles
  5. It’s Only You and Me and We Just Disagree: The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization
  6. When Rural and Urban Become “Us” versus “Them”: How a Growing Divide is Reshaping American Politics
  7. Tribes and Proto-Tribes: The Deep Roots of Political Differences
  8. The Role of Political Elites in Eliciting Mass-Level Political Anger
  9. The Legacy of Rush Limbaugh Will Always Be Tied to Donald Trump
  10. Reflections on the Past and Present of Research on Partisan Identity
  11. What Do We Mean by Negative Partisanship?
  12. Religion as Political Tribalism
  13. The Tribal Economy: Economic Perceptions, Economic Anxiety and the Prospects for Political Accountability
  14. Book Review
  15. Andrea Benjamin: Racial Coalition Building in Local Elections: Elite Cues and Cross-Ethnic Voting
https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2021-2024
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
negative partisanship; partisan identity; partisanship; polarization

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Introduction
  3. Introduction Fall 2021
  4. Articles
  5. It’s Only You and Me and We Just Disagree: The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization
  6. When Rural and Urban Become “Us” versus “Them”: How a Growing Divide is Reshaping American Politics
  7. Tribes and Proto-Tribes: The Deep Roots of Political Differences
  8. The Role of Political Elites in Eliciting Mass-Level Political Anger
  9. The Legacy of Rush Limbaugh Will Always Be Tied to Donald Trump
  10. Reflections on the Past and Present of Research on Partisan Identity
  11. What Do We Mean by Negative Partisanship?
  12. Religion as Political Tribalism
  13. The Tribal Economy: Economic Perceptions, Economic Anxiety and the Prospects for Political Accountability
  14. Book Review
  15. Andrea Benjamin: Racial Coalition Building in Local Elections: Elite Cues and Cross-Ethnic Voting
Jetzt anmelden und 20% sparen
Institutioneller Zugang
Wie funktioniert Authentifizierung?
Haben Sie eine Idee, wie wir unsere Website verbessern können?
Bitte schreiben Sie uns.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Heruntergeladen am 7.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2021-2024/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen