Startseite Cognitive (Construction) Grammar
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Cognitive (Construction) Grammar

  • Ronald W. Langacker
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 10. Februar 2009
Cognitive Linguistics
Aus der Zeitschrift Band 20 Heft 1

Abstract

Goldberg overstates the differences between Cognitive Grammar and Cognitive Construction Grammar. The former does not claim that a clause invariably inherits its profile from the verb; it has merely been suggested that the latter's preference for monosemy may have been pushed too far. The matter can only be addressed given a specific definition of what is meant in saying that a verb “has” a certain sense. Also, the schematic meanings proposed in Cognitive Grammar for basic grammatical notions do not imply a “reductionist” or “essentialist” view based on classical categorization. Instead they complement the characterization of these notions as “metageneralizations over construction-specific categories”, which otherwise begs the question of why the distributional patterns supporting such generalizations should be observed in the first place.


Author's email: 〈〉.

Received: 2007-05-26
Revised: 2007-12-08
Published Online: 2009-02-10
Published in Print: 2009-February

© 2009 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, D-10785 Berlin

Heruntergeladen am 2.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/COGL.2009.010/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen